Bug#1002699: libc6: m68k,s390 readdir not returning filled in dirent pointer

2021-12-27 Thread Camm Maguire
k and s390. = #include #include int main() { struct dirent *d; DIR *r=opendir("./"); for (;(d=readdir(r)) && strcmp("configure",d->d_name);); return d && d->d_type==DT_REG ? 0 : -1; } =======

Bug#1002699: libc6: m68k,sh4 readdir not returning filled in dirent pointer

2021-12-28 Thread Camm Maguire
Correction, that is current autobuilders on 68k and sh4. Take care, Camm Maguire writes: > Package: libc6 > Version: 2.33-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: Policy 2.2.1 > X-Debbugs-Cc: c...@debian.org > > With a file "configure" in the current directory, the

Bug#1002699: libc6: m68k,sh4 readdir not returning filled in dirent pointer

2021-12-30 Thread Camm Maguire
severity 1002699 normal merge 1002699 916276 thanks Thank you so much! John Paul Adrian Glaubitz writes: > Hi Camm! > > On 12/28/21 19:52, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> On 12/28/21 19:20, Camm Maguire wrote: >>> Correction, that is current autobuilders on 68k

Bug#1002699: libc6: m68k,sh4 readdir not returning filled in dirent pointer

2021-12-30 Thread Camm Maguire
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz writes: > Hi Camm! > > On 12/28/21 19:52, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> On 12/28/21 19:20, Camm Maguire wrote: >>> Correction, that is current autobuilders on 68k and sh4. >> >> That's a known issue, see [1]. I will pat

Bug#1002699: libc6: m68k,sh4 readdir not returning filled in dirent pointer

2021-12-31 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! John Paul Adrian Glaubitz writes: > Hello! > > On 12/30/21 21:18, Camm Maguire wrote: >>> I have uploaded patched versions of glibc for m68k and sh4 and blocked the >>> autobuild for glibc on the buildds. >> >> Greetings! I think you meant

Bug#1002699: libc6: m68k,sh4 readdir not returning filled in dirent pointer

2022-01-28 Thread Camm Maguire
-1 libc-dev-bin_2.33-1 libc6_2.33-1 libc6-dev_2.33-1 > > I will regenerate the chroots. > > Adrian > >> [1] >> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcl&arch=m68k&ver=2.6.12-117&stamp=1640457045&r

Bug#387498: mips: system() hangs when compiled with -pg (gprof profiling(.

2006-09-14 Thread Camm Maguire
PROTECTED]:~$ ./t "echo g"   [1]+ Stopped ./t "echo g" -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED] == "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."

Bug#387498: Unable to reproduce - mips/mipsel? 2.4/2.6 kernel difference?

2006-10-02 Thread Camm Maguire
k-ip32 #1 Mon Apr 3 18:39:05 UTC 2006 mips64 > > GNU/Linux > > > > which might explain it. I don't have any mipsen running 2.4 atm. Camm, > > can you still reproduce this? > > > > Ah, hang on - you reported this on vaughan, which is mips*el

Bug#387498: Occurs on hppa too

2006-10-20 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! This exact same problem also afflicts the current hppa autobuilders and paer. Take care, -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED] == "The earth is but one country, and ma

Bug#395135: Please requeue gclcvs_2.7.0-62 on alpha

2006-10-26 Thread Camm Maguire
2006 at 09:31:42AM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote: > > Greetings, and thanks so much! > > > Alas, no we have a problem in system.h: > > > gcc -I../h -I../gcl-tk -o ../bin/dpp ../bin/dpp.c > > In file included from ../h/config.h:11, > > from ../bin/

Bug#395135: Please requeue gclcvs_2.7.0-62 on alpha

2006-10-27 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 08:15:21PM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote: > > Greetings, and thanks so much! Now that this is in, would you kindly > > mind requeueing gclcvs again? > > FWIW, after tracking down the last he

Bug#395135: Please requeue gclcvs_2.7.0-62 on alpha

2006-11-01 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings, and thanks you so much for looking into this! Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 09:48:43AM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote: > > > FWIW, after tracking down the last header problem on alpha I let the test > > > build continue on t

Bug#204789: [Gcl-devel] Re: recent commit

2003-08-29 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings, and thanks again! So how do I find the right area before dumping? Many thanks, David Mosberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>>>> On 28 Aug 2003 21:00:54 -0400, Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Camm> Greetings! This soun

Bug#204789: recent commit

2003-08-30 Thread Camm Maguire
I the only one with these problems on this platform? BTW, Debian hppa works fine. Take care, David Mosberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Camm, > > >>>>> On 21 Aug 2003 00:52:14 -0400, Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Camm> --enable-st

Bug#204789: [Gcl-devel] Re: recent commit

2003-09-05 Thread Camm Maguire
mos ; \ We don't really use these functions, so I think we'd be alright here, but I'd like your opinion as always. Please also et me know whether you think Debian ia64 ldso might change in this regard in the future. Take care, David Mosberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >

Bug#204789: [Gcl-devel] Re: recent commit

2003-09-09 Thread Camm Maguire
always appreciated. David Mosberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>>>> On 05 Sep 2003 18:38:45 -0400, Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Camm> Greetings, and thankyou for this suggestion. It does seem like a bit > Camm> of a hack tho

Bug#204789: axiom, acl2, maxima, gcl on ia64

2003-09-15 Thread Camm Maguire
ink? I'd be most appreciative if these options could be investigated, leading hopefully to a fix in ld.so, which would stabilize these four programs on ia64 once and for all. Is this possible? Can you please help here? Take care, -- Camm Maguire[EM

Bug#204789: gcl segfault on ia64

2003-10-25 Thread Camm Maguire
Version: 2.6.1-16 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable This package segfaults at startup, probably platform specific. Just letting you know! Duraid = Take care, -- Camm Maguire

Bug#204789: Bug#217484: Bug#204789: gcl segfault on ia64

2003-10-28 Thread Camm Maguire
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 02:04:47PM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote: > > reaassign 217484 libc6 > > severity 217484 important > > merge 217484 204789 > > thanks > > > > Greetings! This is due to the way libc6 on ia64 Debian lin

Bug#204789: ia64 function descriptors and unexec

2003-10-29 Thread Camm Maguire
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 11:49:38AM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote: > > Greetings, and thank you so much for your reply on this issue! > > > > Please let me preface the below with the statement that these are, of > > course, my opinions only, and that there may well

Bug#204789: [Gcl-devel] Re: ia64 function descriptors and unexec

2003-10-29 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings, and thanks for your reply! Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > To sum up the previous discussion, the ia64 linux ABI apparently > > offers no opportunity for ld.so to ensure that function descrip

Bug#204789: [Gcl-devel] Re: ia64 function descriptors and unexec

2003-10-31 Thread Camm Maguire
n C source files as explicitly initialized structures? Take care, > Andreas. > > -- > Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg > Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 > "And now

Bug#204789: [Gcl-devel] Re: ia64 function descriptors and unexec

2003-10-31 Thread Camm Maguire
ork. > > Does the Debian packaged version use the portable dumper option? > > > -- > Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp > University of TsukubaTennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN >

Bug#204789: [Gcl-devel] Re: ia64 function descriptors and unexec

2003-10-31 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Greetings! > > > > Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >> > Was there ever a GNU emacs obstacle on ia

Bug#204789: [Gcl-devel] Re: ia64 function descriptors and unexec

2003-11-04 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! OK, I believe at long last I have a fix, but I'd like to make sure it is not accidental, i.e. possibly vanishing with future ia64 toolchain development. Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [removing emacs-devel from cc: since it's off-topic there.

Bug#204789: [Gcl-devel] Re: ia64 function descriptors and unexec

2003-11-06 Thread Camm Maguire
sp code did not have to be changed at all -- only the files in the o/ subdirectory, by in large. I'm uploading new .debs for 2.6.1 and cvs which will close the two bug reports pertinent to this issue. Take care, Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Camm Maguire <[EMAIL P

Bug#225397: ldconfig installs link which gcc cannot use

2003-12-29 Thread Camm Maguire
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10 Severity: important Tags: sid The report that follows is copied from an email sent to Mathias Klose: Camm Maguire writes: > Hi Matthias! And thanks for your report! > > 1) There appears to be a functional change in ldconfig, presumably >

Bug#225397: Bug#224855: atlas2-base-dev: alternatives are broken

2003-12-29 Thread Camm Maguire
PROTECTED] > http://www.twerner42.de/ phone:+49 162 3123004 > jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] icq:342538944 > > > > > -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#224855: Processed: Re: Bug#227308: lapack: too many levels of symbolic links on so

2004-01-15 Thread Camm Maguire
o: Too many levels of symbolic links > > If so, kernel said this symlink has too many levels. Period. > > If not, please provide us the complete shell script to generate your > situation to reappear such trouble on our machine. > > Regards, > -- gotom > > >

Re: Processed: Re: Bug#227308: lapack: too many levels of symbolic links on so

2004-01-16 Thread Camm Maguire
== The problem is that on sid, ldconfig wrote the following link: lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 13 Jan 16 15:08 /usr/lib/liblapack.so.2 -> liblapack2.so Please let me know if further clarification is needed. Take care, GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >

Bug#224855: Processed: Re: Bug#227308: lapack: too many levels of symbolic links on so

2004-01-29 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings, and thanks for your reply! Please excuse my delay, but work is pressing. GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 16 Jan 2004 10:15:06 -0500, > Camm Maguire wrote: > > ===

[Jeff Squyres ] Re: LAM: Re: Bug#51871: lam: does not compile for sparc

1999-12-27 Thread Camm Maguire
sight? Many of the other xdr_* functions seem to be quite similar on Solaris and glibc2.1 systems. Please cc me directly in any response, as I don't subscribe to this list. Many thanks! --- Begin Message --- On 27 Dec 1999, Camm Maguire wrote: > > I'm looking around for refere

Re: LAM: Re: Bug#51871: lam: does not compile for sparc

2000-01-10 Thread Camm Maguire
ponse, as I don't subscribe to this list. Many thanks! --Multipart_Mon_Dec_27_13:25:14_1999-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Date: Mon, 27 Dec 1999 12:31:54 -0500 (EST) From: Jeff Squyres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: LAM: Re: Bug#51871: lam

Bug#204789: gcl segfault on ia64

2003-10-25 Thread Camm Maguire
Version: 2.6.1-16 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable This package segfaults at startup, probably platform specific. Just letting you know! Duraid = Take care, -- Camm Maguire

Bug#204789: [Gcl-devel] Re: ia64 function descriptors and unexec

2003-11-06 Thread Camm Maguire
sp code did not have to be changed at all -- only the files in the o/ subdirectory, by in large. I'm uploading new .debs for 2.6.1 and cvs which will close the two bug reports pertinent to this issue. Take care, Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Camm Maguire <[EMAIL P

Bug#225397: ldconfig installs link which gcc cannot use

2003-12-29 Thread Camm Maguire
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10 Severity: important Tags: sid The report that follows is copied from an email sent to Mathias Klose: Camm Maguire writes: > Hi Matthias! And thanks for your report! > > 1) There appears to be a functional change in ldconfig, presumably >

Bug#225397: Bug#224855: atlas2-base-dev: alternatives are broken

2003-12-29 Thread Camm Maguire
[EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.twerner42.de/ phone:+49 162 3123004 > jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] icq:342538944 > > > > > -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED] ==

Bug#224855: Processed: Re: Bug#227308: lapack: too many levels of symbolic links on so

2004-01-15 Thread Camm Maguire
o: Too many levels of symbolic links > > If so, kernel said this symlink has too many levels. Period. > > If not, please provide us the complete shell script to generate your > situation to reappear such trouble on our machine. > > Regards, > -- gotom > > > -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED] == "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah

Re: Processed: Re: Bug#227308: lapack: too many levels of symbolic links on so

2004-01-16 Thread Camm Maguire
The problem is that on sid, ldconfig wrote the following link: lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 13 Jan 16 15:08 /usr/lib/liblapack.so.2 -> liblapack2.so Please let me know if further clarification is needed. Take care, GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Bug#224855: Processed: Re: Bug#227308: lapack: too many levels of symbolic links on so

2004-01-29 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings, and thanks for your reply! Please excuse my delay, but work is pressing. GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 16 Jan 2004 10:15:06 -0500, > Camm Maguire wrote: > > ===

Bug#221969: Newer libc6.1 cannot correctly return from signal handlers

2004-02-11 Thread Camm Maguire
ends on: ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl -- no debconf information -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED] == "The earth is but one co

Bug#221969: libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-10 & 2.3.2-9 causes Segmentation fault in Java JDK1.3.1 programs on Alpha

2004-04-16 Thread Camm Maguire
ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x201a000 write(1, "Caught signal\n", 14Caught signal ) = 14 mprotect(0x120012000, 8192, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE) = 0 osf_syscall(0x12001cc20, 0x2000, 0x3, 0, 0x, 0) = -78 munmap(0x201a000, 8192) = 0 exit_group(2199025127240)

Bug#221969: Newer libc6.1 cannot correctly return from signal handlers

2004-02-11 Thread Camm Maguire
ends on: ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl -- no debconf information -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED] == "The earth is but one co

Bug#221969: libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-10 & 2.3.2-9 causes Segmentation fault in Java JDK1.3.1 programs on Alpha

2004-03-02 Thread Camm Maguire
o 2.3.2.ds1-10 lets the problem reappear. > > Use JDK 1.4. This is famous breakage. Searching debian-glibc > archive. > > Regards, > -- gotom > > > -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#221969: libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-10 & 2.3.2-9 causes Segmentation fault in Java JDK1.3.1 programs on Alpha

2004-04-16 Thread Camm Maguire
ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x201a000 write(1, "Caught signal\n", 14Caught signal ) = 14 mprotect(0x120012000, 8192, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE) = 0 osf_syscall(0x12001cc20, 0x2000, 0x3, 0, 0x, 0) = -78 munmap(0x201a000, 8192) = 0 exit_group(2199025127240)

Bug#280445: libpthread miscompiled (wrong pic options) on s390

2004-11-09 Thread Camm Maguire
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-18 Severity: serious While the details previously mailed to me have alas now been lost, I believe there is an upstream libc fix for s390 which is not yet in the Debian package. In short, libpthread must be compiled with a certain pic option (-fPIC or -fpic, not s

Bug#280445: libpthread miscompiled (wrong pic options) on s390

2004-11-16 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Gerhard Tonn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > GOTO Masanori wrote: > > At Tue, 09 Nov 2004 15:04:50 +, > > Camm Maguire wrote: > > > >>While the details previously mailed to me have alas now been lost, I > >>believe there is an upstr

Bug#280445: libpthread miscompiled (wrong pic options) on s390

2004-12-01 Thread Camm Maguire
Many thanks to you all! Gerhard Tonn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > GOTO Masanori wrote: > > At Fri, 26 Nov 2004 00:21:54 +0900, > > GOTO Masanori wrote: > > > >>At 16 Nov 2004 10:36:00 -0500, > >>Camm Maguire wrote: > >> > >>>Give