Greetings, and thanks for your reply! Please excuse my delay, but work is pressing.
GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 16 Jan 2004 10:15:06 -0500, > Camm Maguire wrote: > > ============================================================================= > > sid > > ============================================================================= > > intech66:/fix/i/camm/atlas/atlas3-3.6.0# ls -l > > /etc/alternatives/liblapack* /usr/lib/liblapack*so* |grep -v _atlas > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Jan 16 15:02 > > /etc/alternatives/liblapack2.so -> /usr/lib/atlas/liblapack.so > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Jan 16 15:00 > > /usr/lib/liblapack.so -> liblapack.so.2 > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Jan 16 15:08 > > /usr/lib/liblapack.so.2 -> liblapack.so.2.0 > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4438832 Jul 31 23:20 > > /usr/lib/liblapack.so.2.0 > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 Jan 16 15:02 > > /usr/lib/liblapack2.so -> /etc/alternatives/liblapack2.so > > intech66:/fix/i/camm/atlas/atlas3-3.6.0# cat /etc/ld.so.conf > > /usr/X11R6/lib > > /usr/lib/atlas > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > intech66:/fix/i/camm/atlas/atlas3-3.6.0# ldconfig > > intech66:/fix/i/camm/atlas/atlas3-3.6.0# ls -l > > /etc/alternatives/liblapack* /usr/lib/liblapack*so* |grep -v _atlas > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Jan 16 15:02 > > /etc/alternatives/liblapack2.so -> /usr/lib/atlas/liblapack.so > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Jan 16 15:00 > > /usr/lib/liblapack.so -> liblapack.so.2 > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Jan 16 15:08 > > /usr/lib/liblapack.so.2 -> liblapack2.so > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4438832 Jul 31 23:20 > > /usr/lib/liblapack.so.2.0 > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 Jan 16 15:02 > > /usr/lib/liblapack2.so -> /etc/alternatives/liblapack2.so > > ============================================================================= > > > > The problem is that on sid, ldconfig wrote the following link: > > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Jan 16 15:08 > > /usr/lib/liblapack.so.2 -> liblapack2.so > > > > Please let me know if further clarification is needed. > > Does your problem occur if you put "/usr/lib/atlas" into > /etc/ld.so.conf? BTW, why does your library need to add such entry > into ld.so.conf? Yes in the scenario above /usr/lib/atlas is in /etc/ld.so.conf and contains a liblapack.so (e.g. atlas2-base is installed). atlas provides binary compatible versions of the blas and lapack libraries, allowing all packages using these libraries to achieve per processor accelerations without recompiling. Furthermore, a non-root user can test their code against any compatible version installed via the LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variables. The README.Debian in the atlas package explains this in greater detail. Please let me know if further assistance is needed. Take care, > > Regards, > -- gotom > > > > -- Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] ========================================================================== "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
