Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 211784 dpkg
Bug#211784: libc6: service stop/start delay too short for nis
Bug reassigned from package `libc6' to `dpkg'.
> retitle 211784 dpkg: start-stop-daemon --stop does not check the actual
> process termination in default
Bug#211784: li
reassign 211784 dpkg
retitle 211784 dpkg: start-stop-daemon --stop does not check the actual process
termination in default
thanks
At Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:07:27 -0300,
Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote:
> I don't know, but I have seen this happen (and because of this I tend
> not to use restart; I use a
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Sat Jul 17 01:23:37 MDT 2004
Log Message:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc.postinst: Change sleep time from 1 to 2.
It's work-around fix, actual fix is start-stop-daemon --stop should
check the process termination. See:
Repository: glibc-package/debian/debhelper.in
who:gotom
time: Sat Jul 17 01:23:37 MDT 2004
Log Message:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc.postinst: Change sleep time from 1 to 2.
It's work-around fix, actual fix is start-stop-daemon --stop should
check the process termi
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Sat Jul 17 02:19:30 MDT 2004
Log Message:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc.postinst: Add lpr-ppd. Change init script
name from lpr, lpr-ppd to lpd, lpd-ppd. (Closes: #205084)
Files:
changed:changelog
Repository: glibc-package/debian/debhelper.in
who:gotom
time: Sat Jul 17 02:19:30 MDT 2004
Log Message:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc.postinst: Add lpr-ppd. Change init script
name from lpr, lpr-ppd to lpd, lpd-ppd. (Closes: #205084)
Files:
changed:libc.postins
The Unicode HOW-TO, the advice about unicode_start and LatArCyrHeb in
the /~.bash_profile file, the mule-ucs package together did the trick.
Many thanks.
(Do other people run into this kind of trouble ? Would putting the
unicode_start struff in a default configuration start-up script help ?)
I
At Tue, 12 Aug 2003 06:40:11 +1000,
Duraid Madina wrote:
> And they say that 'this problem is due to our compiler not supporting
> glibc 2.3 yet.'
>
> A fix is in the works, apparently.
#204805 is reported in 2.3.2, but now we have 2.3.2.ds1. Is this bug
still alive?
BTW, there's two bugs abou
At Tue, 12 Aug 2003 15:35:01 +0200,
Pasquali Luca wrote:
> it seems that lpd is not detected, and the name service switch change
> implies it to be restarted.
Yes, that should be added. In 2.3.2.ds1-13, there's the entry:
check="$check cupsys lprng lpr autofs snmpd ssh-krb5 samba"
But I
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 202023 wishlist
Bug#202023: glibc-doc: rcmd/rcmd_af undocumented
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs da
Hi Masanori,
#204805 is fixed now. #256770 is a new bug. But the problem may not be
with the Intel compiler. Why are symbols multiply defined in libc.a?? It
seems a mistake.
The Intel compiler works on RedHat and SuSE.
Also, you can download the compiler for free, from this webs
Hi,
At 08 Sep 2003 13:06:27 -0700,
Kendall Shaw wrote:
> This is similar to what I experience, except that I am using:
>
> libc6-2.3.1-16
> samba-3.0.0beta2-1.
>
> My system does not lock up.
Is this bug still appeared in the latest glibc and samba? I guess
even if we had the bug, this should
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 204735 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#204735: bug in new libc6 causes samba to crash
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 127980 libc0.3
Bug#127980: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: NSS and static binaries]
Bug reassigned from package `glibc' to `libc0.3'.
> severity 128336 wishlist
Bug#128336: glibc-doc: timer_create() et al are not documented
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> t
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:08:42 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libc6: Asia/Jerusalem and Asia/Tel_Aviv are not linked and are
out of date
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 165881 EAGAIN != EWOULDBLOCK should be described for hppa
Bug#165881: [hppa] EAGAIN != EWOULDBLOCK, breaks various programs
Changed Bug title.
> reassign 165881 glibc-doc
Bug#165881: EAGAIN != EWOULDBLOCK should be described for hppa
Bug reassi
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.2.5-3
> Severity: normal
>
> Looks like an attempt to mmap an area that is too big for the processes
> address space[1] causes mmap to return EINVAL instead of ENOMEM.
> According to the docs of the LSB test suite, it should be ENOMEM:
>
> If _POSIX_SHARED_MEMORY_OBJ
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:27:28 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#162584: memory leak in gethostbyname_r
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 223394 moreinfo
Bug#223394: libc6: NPTL causes segfaults on forking(?) apps with 2.6.0-test11
with exec_shield
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 256770 confirmed
Bug#256770: libc6.1-dev: multiple definitions in libc.a (lc-ctype.o), breaks
Intel compiler
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug t
tags 256770 confirmed
thanks
Hi,
At Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:50:42 +1000,
Duraid Madina wrote:
> #204805 is fixed now.
Thanks for your quick reply. I close it now.
> #256770 is a new bug. But the problem may not be
> with the Intel compiler. Why are symbols multiply defined in libc.a?? It
>
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:32:58 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#204805: Intel have reproduced this 'bug'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:36:36 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#215981: libc6: Please add Brazilian daylight saving data
for 2003/2004 summer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:42:57 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#259537: Bug resolution (It was a configuration issue)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Nouvelle adresse email
Bonjour,
mon adresse email a changé. Ce n'est plus [EMAIL PROTECTED] mais [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Merci donc de réenvoyer votre mail à cette adresse.
Cordialement,
Sir Jaguar
Original Message
> Please have a look at the attach
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Nouvelle adresse email
Bonjour,
mon adresse email a changé. Ce n'est plus [EMAIL PROTECTED] mais [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Merci donc de réenvoyer votre mail à cette adresse.
Cordialement,
Sir Jaguar
Original Message
> Please have a look at the attach
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Nouvelle adresse email
Bonjour,
mon adresse email a changé. Ce n'est plus [EMAIL PROTECTED] mais [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Merci donc de réenvoyer votre mail à cette adresse.
Cordialement,
Sir Jaguar
Original Message
> Please have a look at the attach
On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 06:36:36PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Sat, 17 Jul 2004 00:50:10 -0300,
> Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote:
> > Let's hope this year they
> > announce it a bit earlier ;-) (I have no hope of the "Oct Sun>=15" guess
> > being right, but the Sunday part is right more often than
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 211784 dpkg
Bug#211784: libc6: service stop/start delay too short for nis
Bug reassigned from package `libc6' to `dpkg'.
> retitle 211784 dpkg: start-stop-daemon --stop does not check the actual process
> termination in default
Bug#211784: li
reassign 211784 dpkg
retitle 211784 dpkg: start-stop-daemon --stop does not check the actual process
termination in default
thanks
At Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:07:27 -0300,
Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote:
> I don't know, but I have seen this happen (and because of this I tend
> not to use restart; I use a
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Sat Jul 17 01:23:37 MDT 2004
Log Message:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc.postinst: Change sleep time from 1 to 2.
It's work-around fix, actual fix is start-stop-daemon --stop should
check the process termination. See:
Repository: glibc-package/debian/debhelper.in
who:gotom
time: Sat Jul 17 01:23:37 MDT 2004
Log Message:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc.postinst: Change sleep time from 1 to 2.
It's work-around fix, actual fix is start-stop-daemon --stop should
check the process termi
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Sat Jul 17 02:19:30 MDT 2004
Log Message:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc.postinst: Add lpr-ppd. Change init script
name from lpr, lpr-ppd to lpd, lpd-ppd. (Closes: #205084)
Files:
changed:changelog
--
To UNSUBS
Repository: glibc-package/debian/debhelper.in
who:gotom
time: Sat Jul 17 02:19:30 MDT 2004
Log Message:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc.postinst: Add lpr-ppd. Change init script
name from lpr, lpr-ppd to lpd, lpd-ppd. (Closes: #205084)
Files:
changed:libc.postins
The Unicode HOW-TO, the advice about unicode_start and LatArCyrHeb in
the /~.bash_profile file, the mule-ucs package together did the trick.
Many thanks.
(Do other people run into this kind of trouble ? Would putting the
unicode_start struff in a default configuration start-up script help ?)
I
At Tue, 12 Aug 2003 06:40:11 +1000,
Duraid Madina wrote:
> And they say that 'this problem is due to our compiler not supporting
> glibc 2.3 yet.'
>
> A fix is in the works, apparently.
#204805 is reported in 2.3.2, but now we have 2.3.2.ds1. Is this bug
still alive?
BTW, there's two bugs abou
At Tue, 12 Aug 2003 15:35:01 +0200,
Pasquali Luca wrote:
> it seems that lpd is not detected, and the name service switch change
> implies it to be restarted.
Yes, that should be added. In 2.3.2.ds1-13, there's the entry:
check="$check cupsys lprng lpr autofs snmpd ssh-krb5 samba"
But I
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 202023 wishlist
Bug#202023: glibc-doc: rcmd/rcmd_af undocumented
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs da
Hi Masanori,
#204805 is fixed now. #256770 is a new bug. But the problem may not be
with the Intel compiler. Why are symbols multiply defined in libc.a?? It
seems a mistake.
The Intel compiler works on RedHat and SuSE.
Also, you can download the compiler for free, from this webs
Hi,
At 08 Sep 2003 13:06:27 -0700,
Kendall Shaw wrote:
> This is similar to what I experience, except that I am using:
>
> libc6-2.3.1-16
> samba-3.0.0beta2-1.
>
> My system does not lock up.
Is this bug still appeared in the latest glibc and samba? I guess
even if we had the bug, this should
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 204735 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#204735: bug in new libc6 causes samba to crash
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 127980 libc0.3
Bug#127980: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: NSS and static binaries]
Bug reassigned from package `glibc' to `libc0.3'.
> severity 128336 wishlist
Bug#128336: glibc-doc: timer_create() et al are not documented
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> t
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:08:42 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libc6: Asia/Jerusalem and Asia/Tel_Aviv are not linked and are out of
date
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 165881 EAGAIN != EWOULDBLOCK should be described for hppa
Bug#165881: [hppa] EAGAIN != EWOULDBLOCK, breaks various programs
Changed Bug title.
> reassign 165881 glibc-doc
Bug#165881: EAGAIN != EWOULDBLOCK should be described for hppa
Bug reassi
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.2.5-3
> Severity: normal
>
> Looks like an attempt to mmap an area that is too big for the processes
> address space[1] causes mmap to return EINVAL instead of ENOMEM.
> According to the docs of the LSB test suite, it should be ENOMEM:
>
> If _POSIX_SHARED_MEMORY_OBJ
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:27:28 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#162584: memory leak in gethostbyname_r
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 223394 moreinfo
Bug#223394: libc6: NPTL causes segfaults on forking(?) apps with 2.6.0-test11 with
exec_shield
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 256770 confirmed
Bug#256770: libc6.1-dev: multiple definitions in libc.a (lc-ctype.o), breaks Intel
compiler
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug t
tags 256770 confirmed
thanks
Hi,
At Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:50:42 +1000,
Duraid Madina wrote:
> #204805 is fixed now.
Thanks for your quick reply. I close it now.
> #256770 is a new bug. But the problem may not be
> with the Intel compiler. Why are symbols multiply defined in libc.a?? It
>
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:32:58 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#204805: Intel have reproduced this 'bug'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:42:57 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#259537: Bug resolution (It was a configuration issue)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:36:36 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#215981: libc6: Please add Brazilian daylight saving data for
2003/2004 summer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Nouvelle adresse email
Bonjour,
mon adresse email a changé. Ce n'est plus [EMAIL PROTECTED] mais [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Merci donc de réenvoyer votre mail à cette adresse.
Cordialement,
Sir Jaguar
Original Message
> Please have a look at the attache
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Nouvelle adresse email
Bonjour,
mon adresse email a changé. Ce n'est plus [EMAIL PROTECTED] mais [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Merci donc de réenvoyer votre mail à cette adresse.
Cordialement,
Sir Jaguar
Original Message
> Please have a look at the attache
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Nouvelle adresse email
Bonjour,
mon adresse email a changé. Ce n'est plus [EMAIL PROTECTED] mais [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Merci donc de réenvoyer votre mail à cette adresse.
Cordialement,
Sir Jaguar
Original Message
> Please have a look at the attache
On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 06:36:36PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Sat, 17 Jul 2004 00:50:10 -0300,
> Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote:
> > Let's hope this year they
> > announce it a bit earlier ;-) (I have no hope of the "Oct Sun>=15" guess
> > being right, but the Sunday part is right more often than
56 matches
Mail list logo
