cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by gotom

Repository: glibc-package/debian who:gotom time: Wed Jun 30 22:43:05 MDT 2004 Log Message: - debian/patches/glibc232-iconv-ucs2-unalign.dpatch: Added to fix iconv unalignment access with UCS-2BE/UCS-2LE on some architectures. (Closes: #234691) Files: chang

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/patches by gotom

Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches who:gotom time: Wed Jun 30 22:43:05 MDT 2004 Log Message: - debian/patches/glibc232-iconv-ucs2-unalign.dpatch: Added to fix iconv unalignment access with UCS-2BE/UCS-2LE on some architectures. (Closes: #234691) File

Bug#234691: sparc64 too..

Hi, At Wed, 26 May 2004 12:08:17 +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > #234691 is the last RC bug for debian glibc package. I digged this > problem, and it seemed it was not glibc iconv(3) problem. I suspect > mkisofs mkisofs iconv patch. Joerg, could you reproduce this problem > on sparc and on i386?

Bug#221850: libc6: resolving broken since ds1-10

At Fri, 12 Mar 2004 23:53:21 +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > At Sun, 25 Jan 2004 14:15:02 +0200 (EET), > Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > > > > > > That said, I believe I upgraded it to something in the 2.3.2.ds1 > > > > > > > series at > > > > > > > one point while still running 2.4 without obvious pr

Bug#221850: marked as done (libc6: resolving broken since ds1-10)

Your message dated Thu, 1 Jul 2004 11:52:05 +0300 (EEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#221850: libc6: resolving broken since ds1-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

And do you know

Good Day, You have been Pre-Selected from a previous application to join our New Exclusive Program while still in thelaunch phase.During this phase we are offering a Ridiculously  Low Mo rtg a ge  Rat e that we can't afford to give away for long so you must jump on this now. Please visit the fo

「限定30名極秘情報」のお知らせ

$BFMA3$N%a!<%k$G<:Ni$$$?$7$^$9!#(B (B $B:4!9LZ$H?=$7$^$9!#$O$8$a$^$7$F!*(B (B $B$b$&$4B8CN$NJ}$b$"$k$+$H;W$$$^$9$,LLGr$$$*6b$K$J$j$=$&$J(B (B $B>pJs$rF~8BDj$J$N$G$*Aa$a$K;22C$7$F$/[EMAIL PROTECTED](B (B $B7h$7$FL5M}$J$*M6$$$O$7$^$;$s$N$G$3$N%N%&%O%&[EMAIL PROTECTED](B (B $B$*6b$K$J$j$

Bug#220211: ldd error when installing kernel image

At Tue, 11 Nov 2003 05:57:40 -0800 (PST), Chris Knoblock wrote: > Package: libc6 > Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10 > > I get the following error when installing > kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686: > > ldd: /lib/ld-linux.so.2 exited with unknown error code > (139( > failed to create initrd image > > NOTE: ldd /bi

Bug#219610: sleep has illegal instruction with glibc 2.3.2: stmxcsr ?

At Fri, 7 Nov 2003 11:43:21 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 05:24:17PM +0100, Claus Fischer wrote: > > > > Package: libc6 > > Version: 2.3.2-9 > > > > > > The shell command 'sleep 1' gives an 'illegal instruction' error. > > As you can see below, apparently on an stmxcs

Bug#220706: marked as done (error in libc6 / sparc / sarge)

Your message dated Fri, 02 Jul 2004 02:36:36 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#220706: error in libc6 / sparc / sarge has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: tagging 146489

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 146489 fixed-upstream Bug#146489: libc6: PPC ld.so: missing icache flushes cause occasionnal SEGV's Tags were: upstream patch Tags added: fixed-upstream > End of message, stop

FreeeeMorgaggeQuotes.LetTheBankkCompeteForYourrMortgagge.Inside...

Programs > ProgramsForEveryCreditSituation k > LendersReplyWithin 24hours q > BorrowUpTo 125%of YourHomesValue T > SpecialProgramsForSelfEmployed T > NoIncomeVerificationPrograms W http://zRHMM.aldicijh.info/?nApaVHnxYXukInneyOMd

Bug#221566: libc6: apt-get post-install script returns error exit status 139

Hi, Could you confirm this bug is still appeared in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13? At Mon, 22 Mar 2004 22:58:50 +0900, Dmitry Maksyoma wrote: > Same here. ls -l, df, date, tar all segfault. Statically linked tar > works ok, but not date. > > monster:/lib# strace date > execve("/bin/date", ["date"], [/* 41

Bug#221850: marked as done (libc6: resolving broken since ds1-10)

Your message dated Thu, 1 Jul 2004 11:52:05 +0300 (EEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#221850: libc6: resolving broken since ds1-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

And do you know

Good Day, You have been Pre-Selected from a previous application to join our New Exclusive Program while still in thelaunch phase.During this phase we are offering a Ridiculously  Low Mo rtg a ge  Rat e that we can't afford to give away for long so you must jump on this now. Please visit the fo

$B!V8BDj(B30$BL>(B$B6KHk>pJs!W$N$*CN$i$;(B

$BFMA3$N%a!<%k$G<:Ni$$$?$7$^$9!#(B (B $B:4!9LZ$H?=$7$^$9!#$O$8$a$^$7$F!*(B (B $B$b$&$4B8CN$NJ}$b$"$k$+$H;W$$$^$9$,LLGr$$$*6b$K$J$j$=$&$J(B (B $B>pJs$rF~8BDj$J$N$G$*Aa$a$K;22C$7$F$/[EMAIL PROTECTED](B (B $B7h$7$FL5M}$J$*M6$$$O$7$^$;$s$N$G$3$N%N%&%O%&[EMAIL PROTECTED](B (B $B$*6b$K$J$j$

Bug#220211: ldd error when installing kernel image

At Tue, 11 Nov 2003 05:57:40 -0800 (PST), Chris Knoblock wrote: > Package: libc6 > Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10 > > I get the following error when installing > kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686: > > ldd: /lib/ld-linux.so.2 exited with unknown error code > (139( > failed to create initrd image > > NOTE: ldd /bi

Bug#219610: sleep has illegal instruction with glibc 2.3.2: stmxcsr ?

At Fri, 7 Nov 2003 11:43:21 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 05:24:17PM +0100, Claus Fischer wrote: > > > > Package: libc6 > > Version: 2.3.2-9 > > > > > > The shell command 'sleep 1' gives an 'illegal instruction' error. > > As you can see below, apparently on an stmxcs

Bug#220706: marked as done (error in libc6 / sparc / sarge)

Your message dated Fri, 02 Jul 2004 02:36:36 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#220706: error in libc6 / sparc / sarge has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: tagging 146489

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 146489 fixed-upstream Bug#146489: libc6: PPC ld.so: missing icache flushes cause occasionnal SEGV's Tags were: upstream patch Tags added: fixed-upstream > End of message, stop

FreeeeMorgaggeQuotes.LetTheBankkCompeteForYourrMortgagge.Inside...

Programs > ProgramsForEveryCreditSituation k > LendersReplyWithin 24hours q > BorrowUpTo 125%of YourHomesValue T > SpecialProgramsForSelfEmployed T > NoIncomeVerificationPrograms W http://zRHMM.aldicijh.info/?nApaVHnxYXukInneyOMd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Bug#221566: libc6: apt-get post-install script returns error exit status 139

Hi, Could you confirm this bug is still appeared in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13? At Mon, 22 Mar 2004 22:58:50 +0900, Dmitry Maksyoma wrote: > Same here. ls -l, df, date, tar all segfault. Statically linked tar > works ok, but not date. > > monster:/lib# strace date > execve("/bin/date", ["date"], [/* 41

Bug#257244: /usr/bin/zdump: zdump Foo returns GMT rather than an error.

Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-13 Severity: minor File: /usr/bin/zdump This can lead to confusion/problems when trying something like zdump London rather than zdump GB, and likewise if running on a system with less than the usual zoneinfo files. Rob -- System Information: Debian Release: tes