On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 04:43:39AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At Mon, 18 Aug 2003 12:57:34 +0300,
> Wladimir Mutel wrote:
> > Perhaps we should wait for more fresh Samba 3.0.0 packed into .deb
> > Samba 3.0.0 rc1 was released recently, and its changelog, in part,
> > reads :
Hello,
while dist-upgrading from stable to testing I encounterd the following
problem, also discussed in
http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-glibc@lists.debian.org/msg08274.html
and treated as bug#226688.
Every program using fork() is thrwoing the assertion:
sh: ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/for
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 04:03:25AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> I didn't write important information previously that I tried to
> reappear this bug on my "chroot woody" environment, but it was
> failed.
> I tried to upgrade this chroot woody from woody to sarge with
> "apt-get dist-upgrade" afte
Package: libc6-dbg
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-13
Severity: wishlist
after installing this package no info is provided on how to use it.
I have seen people tempted to replace libc6 files with libc6-dbg in the
most dartiest way by moving files with mv.
So I suggest adding some doc file to package suggestin
This may be our last attempt to contact you,
please do not waituntil it's too late. Get your
application in to us before
r at esgo up. Interest r at es for
mor t
g ages are currently only 3. 5 %
Please use the short form here.
Yours sincerely,
Eastman
xuhxecd xxbhuvx yqwtt ahccxp xtl
Your message dated Thu, 01 Jul 2004 09:27:52 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#205058: samba 3.0.0beta2-1 sets bad supplementary group
list with libc6 2.3.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
At Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:40:52 +0200,
Frank Hempel wrote:
> while dist-upgrading from stable to testing I encounterd the following
> problem, also discussed in
> http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-glibc@lists.debian.org/msg08274.html
> and treated as bug#226688.
>
> Every program using fork() is th
At Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:21:39 +0200,
txemi wrote:
> after installing this package no info is provided on how to use it.
> I have seen people tempted to replace libc6 files with libc6-dbg in the
> most dartiest way by moving files with mv.
>
> So I suggest adding some doc file to package suggesting
At Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:47:00 +0200,
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> >>> (3) This problem is occured when your dpkg is old (woody) and you
> >>> want to install sarge's glibc-doc. I wonder we need to support
> >>> such situation.
>
> >> I think we should. People mixing stable and testing
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 04:43:39AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At Mon, 18 Aug 2003 12:57:34 +0300,
> Wladimir Mutel wrote:
> > Perhaps we should wait for more fresh Samba 3.0.0 packed into .deb
> > Samba 3.0.0 rc1 was released recently, and its changelog, in part,
> > reads :
Hello,
while dist-upgrading from stable to testing I encounterd the following
problem, also discussed in
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg08274.html
and treated as bug#226688.
Every program using fork() is thrwoing the assertion:
sh: ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/fork.c:132: __l
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 04:03:25AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> I didn't write important information previously that I tried to
> reappear this bug on my "chroot woody" environment, but it was
> failed.
> I tried to upgrade this chroot woody from woody to sarge with
> "apt-get dist-upgrade" afte
Package: libc6-dbg
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-13
Severity: wishlist
after installing this package no info is provided on how to use it.
I have seen people tempted to replace libc6 files with libc6-dbg in the
most dartiest way by moving files with mv.
So I suggest adding some doc file to package suggestin
This may be our last attempt to contact you,
please do not waituntil it's too late. Get your
application in to us before
r at esgo up. Interest r at es for
mor t
g ages are currently only 3. 5 %
Please use the short form here.
Yours sincerely,
Eastman
xuhxecd xxbhuvx yqwtt ahccxp xtl
Your message dated Thu, 01 Jul 2004 09:27:52 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#205058: samba 3.0.0beta2-1 sets bad supplementary group list with
libc6 2.3.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
At Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:40:52 +0200,
Frank Hempel wrote:
> while dist-upgrading from stable to testing I encounterd the following
> problem, also discussed in
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg08274.html
> and treated as bug#226688.
>
> Every program using fork() is thrwoing the a
At Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:21:39 +0200,
txemi wrote:
> after installing this package no info is provided on how to use it.
> I have seen people tempted to replace libc6 files with libc6-dbg in the
> most dartiest way by moving files with mv.
>
> So I suggest adding some doc file to package suggesting
At Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:47:00 +0200,
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> >>> (3) This problem is occured when your dpkg is old (woody) and you
> >>> want to install sarge's glibc-doc. I wonder we need to support
> >>> such situation.
>
> >> I think we should. People mixing stable and testing
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Wed Jun 30 22:43:05 MDT 2004
Log Message:
- debian/patches/glibc232-iconv-ucs2-unalign.dpatch: Added to fix
iconv unalignment access with UCS-2BE/UCS-2LE on some architectures.
(Closes: #234691)
Files:
chang
Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches
who:gotom
time: Wed Jun 30 22:43:05 MDT 2004
Log Message:
- debian/patches/glibc232-iconv-ucs2-unalign.dpatch: Added to fix
iconv unalignment access with UCS-2BE/UCS-2LE on some architectures.
(Closes: #234691)
File
Hi,
At Wed, 26 May 2004 12:08:17 +0900,
GOTO Masanori wrote:
> #234691 is the last RC bug for debian glibc package. I digged this
> problem, and it seemed it was not glibc iconv(3) problem. I suspect
> mkisofs mkisofs iconv patch. Joerg, could you reproduce this problem
> on sparc and on i386?
At Fri, 12 Mar 2004 23:53:21 +0900,
GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Sun, 25 Jan 2004 14:15:02 +0200 (EET),
> Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > > > > > > That said, I believe I upgraded it to something in the 2.3.2.ds1 series
> > > > > > > at
> > > > > > > one point while still running 2.4 without obvious pr
22 matches
Mail list logo
