Processed: Adjusting severity

2003-07-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 203434 wishlist Bug#203434: libc6: accessing thread-local storage causes SIGSEGV Severity set to `wishlist'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator

Bug#203434: libc6: accessing thread-local storage causes SIGSEGV

2003-07-29 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:03:58PM -0700, Ben Liblit wrote: > Package: libc6 > Version: 2.3.1-17 > Severity: normal > > gcc-3.3.1 understands a syntax for declaring C global variables with > thread-local storage. Programs using this extension compile and link > fine, but fail at run time. As soo

Bug#203434: libc6: accessing thread-local storage causes SIGSEGV

2003-07-29 Thread Ben Liblit
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.1-17 Severity: normal gcc-3.3.1 understands a syntax for declaring C global variables with thread-local storage. Programs using this extension compile and link fine, but fail at run time. As soon as a program accesses or takes the address of any piece of thread-local

Processed: Adjusting severity

2003-07-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 203434 wishlist Bug#203434: libc6: accessing thread-local storage causes SIGSEGV Severity set to `wishlist'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator

Bug#203434: libc6: accessing thread-local storage causes SIGSEGV

2003-07-29 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:03:58PM -0700, Ben Liblit wrote: > Package: libc6 > Version: 2.3.1-17 > Severity: normal > > gcc-3.3.1 understands a syntax for declaring C global variables with > thread-local storage. Programs using this extension compile and link > fine, but fail at run time. As soo

Processed: Patch for _XOPEN_VERSION bug

2003-07-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 203412 + patch Bug#203412: libc6-dev: _XOPEN_VERSION is never set to 600 There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks, control, and have a nice day Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking sys

Re: glibc 2.3.2 intermediate status of the compilation (not test) on all archs

2003-07-29 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:55:30PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote: > On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 20:27, Jeff Bailey wrote: > > I'll look at it tonight. There was another build failure, but it looks > > solvable. > > There were a couple of minor problems on alpha aside from the binutils > issue, but I hav

Bug#203412: Patch for _XOPEN_VERSION bug

2003-07-29 Thread Brian M. Carlson
tags 203412 + patch thanks, control, and have a nice day Included is a patch to fix this bug so that _XOPEN_VERSION will be 600 when __USE_XOPEN2K is defined. cd754038fdc73d5a18f40a93d951832c *unistd.h.xopen_ver_600.diff -- Brian M. Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0x560553e7 "Let us think the unthi

Bug#203434: libc6: accessing thread-local storage causes SIGSEGV

2003-07-29 Thread Ben Liblit
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.1-17 Severity: normal gcc-3.3.1 understands a syntax for declaring C global variables with thread-local storage. Programs using this extension compile and link fine, but fail at run time. As soon as a program accesses or takes the address of any piece of thread-local

Bug#203412: libc6-dev: _XOPEN_VERSION is never set to 600

2003-07-29 Thread Brian M. Carlson
Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.3.2-1 Severity: normal [ If I downgraded to sid, I am sure that I would find this bug there, too. Please don't just tag this experimental and forget about it. ] Basically, the problem is, when compiling a program with the following compiler flags -D_POSIX_SOURCE

Processed: Patch for _XOPEN_VERSION bug

2003-07-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 203412 + patch Bug#203412: libc6-dev: _XOPEN_VERSION is never set to 600 There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks, control, and have a nice day Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking sys

Re: glibc 2.3.2 intermediate status of the compilation (not test) on all archs

2003-07-29 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:55:30PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote: > On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 20:27, Jeff Bailey wrote: > > I'll look at it tonight. There was another build failure, but it looks > > solvable. > > There were a couple of minor problems on alpha aside from the binutils > issue, but I hav

Bug#203412: Patch for _XOPEN_VERSION bug

2003-07-29 Thread Brian M. Carlson
tags 203412 + patch thanks, control, and have a nice day Included is a patch to fix this bug so that _XOPEN_VERSION will be 600 when __USE_XOPEN2K is defined. cd754038fdc73d5a18f40a93d951832c *unistd.h.xopen_ver_600.diff -- Brian M. Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0x560553e7 "Let us think the unthi

Bug#203412: libc6-dev: _XOPEN_VERSION is never set to 600

2003-07-29 Thread Brian M. Carlson
Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.3.2-1 Severity: normal [ If I downgraded to sid, I am sure that I would find this bug there, too. Please don't just tag this experimental and forget about it. ] Basically, the problem is, when compiling a program with the following compiler flags -D_POSIX_SOURCE

Re: glibc 2.3.2 intermediate status of the compilation (not test) on all archs

2003-07-29 Thread Philip Blundell
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 20:59, Jeff Bailey wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:55:30PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote: > > > I think we are now in good enough shape to go ahead and upload 2.3.2-2 > > to unstable for tomorrow's dinstall. Any dissent? > > Should we add if [ $ARCH = "hppa" ]; then exit

Re: glibc 2.3.2 intermediate status of the compilation (not test) on all archs

2003-07-29 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:55:30PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote: > I think we are now in good enough shape to go ahead and upload 2.3.2-2 > to unstable for tomorrow's dinstall. Any dissent? Should we add if [ $ARCH = "hppa" ]; then exit 1; fi at the top to make sure hppa doesn't get clobbered ac

Bug#203324: unreproducible?

2003-07-29 Thread Harald Nordgård-Hansen
Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Have you tried: busted kernel with old glibc? I assume that worked, > right? Been running that kernel since march or so, it has worked flawlessy through several glibc versions, yes. Downgrading glibc is always such a mess, though, so I haven't done that y

Re: glibc 2.3.2 intermediate status of the compilation (not test) on all archs

2003-07-29 Thread Philip Blundell
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 20:27, Jeff Bailey wrote: > I'll look at it tonight. There was another build failure, but it looks > solvable. There were a couple of minor problems on alpha aside from the binutils issue, but I have checked in patches for these and it seems to be working now. So, to update

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by pb

2003-07-29 Thread Debian GLibc CVS Master
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:pb time: Tue Jul 29 13:36:59 MDT 2003 Log Message: add alpha-pwrite Files: changed:changelog

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/patches by pb

2003-07-29 Thread Debian GLibc CVS Master
Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches who:pb time: Tue Jul 29 13:36:59 MDT 2003 Log Message: add alpha-pwrite Files: changed:0list added: alpha-pwrite.dpatch

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/patches by pb

2003-07-29 Thread Debian GLibc CVS Master
Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches who:pb time: Tue Jul 29 13:21:45 MDT 2003 Log Message: add alpha-crti.dpatch require binutils 2.14.90.0.5-0.1 or later Files: changed:0list added: alpha-crti.dpatch

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by pb

2003-07-29 Thread Debian GLibc CVS Master
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:pb time: Tue Jul 29 13:21:45 MDT 2003 Log Message: add alpha-crti.dpatch require binutils 2.14.90.0.5-0.1 or later Files: changed:changelog control

Bug#203324: unreproducible?

2003-07-29 Thread Joshua Kwan
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 09:01:47PM +0200, Harald Nordgård-Hansen wrote: > Sounds strange to me, but I tried dropping in > kernel-image-2.4.21-sparc32 (single-CPU box here), and it works > nicely. So it actually looks to be a kernel issue, yes. Or at the > least it is being masked by upgrading the

Processed: Re: Bug#203322: Acknowledgement (python2.2: Python fails with illegal instruction during postinst on sparc32)

2003-07-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 203322 libc6 Bug#203322: python2.2: Python fails with illegal instruction during postinst on sparc32 Bug reassigned from package `python2.2' to `libc6'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#203324: unreproducible?

2003-07-29 Thread Harald Nordgård-Hansen
Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I can't reproduce this bug on my SS10 at all. > ps works fine, and reportbug (hence python2.2) does too. > Got any specific @ARGV? Nope, just empty @ARGV. > BTW, this SS10 is running 2.4.21, kernel-image-2.4.21-sparc32-smp. It > might well be a kernel is

Re: glibc 2.3.2 intermediate status of the compilation (not test)on all archs

2003-07-29 Thread Philip Blundell
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 20:59, Jeff Bailey wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:55:30PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote: > > > I think we are now in good enough shape to go ahead and upload 2.3.2-2 > > to unstable for tomorrow's dinstall. Any dissent? > > Should we add if [ $ARCH = "hppa" ]; then exit

Bug#203324: unreproducible?

2003-07-29 Thread Joshua Kwan
I can't reproduce this bug on my SS10 at all. ps works fine, and reportbug (hence python2.2) does too. Got any specific @ARGV? BTW, this SS10 is running 2.4.21, kernel-image-2.4.21-sparc32-smp. It might well be a kernel issue? -Josh pgpoZIhXOfisO.pgp Description: PGP signature

Processed: tags

2003-07-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 200356 glibc Bug#200356: console-tools: consolechars won't run Bug reassigned from package `console-tools' to `glibc'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adminis

Re: glibc 2.3.2 intermediate status of the compilation (not test) on all archs

2003-07-29 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:55:30PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote: > I think we are now in good enough shape to go ahead and upload 2.3.2-2 > to unstable for tomorrow's dinstall. Any dissent? Should we add if [ $ARCH = "hppa" ]; then exit 1; fi at the top to make sure hppa doesn't get clobbered ac

Bug#203324: unreproducible?

2003-07-29 Thread Harald Nordgård-Hansen
Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Have you tried: busted kernel with old glibc? I assume that worked, > right? Been running that kernel since march or so, it has worked flawlessy through several glibc versions, yes. Downgrading glibc is always such a mess, though, so I haven't done that y

Re: glibc 2.3.2 intermediate status of the compilation (not test)on all archs

2003-07-29 Thread Philip Blundell
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 20:27, Jeff Bailey wrote: > I'll look at it tonight. There was another build failure, but it looks > solvable. There were a couple of minor problems on alpha aside from the binutils issue, but I have checked in patches for these and it seems to be working now. So, to update

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by pb

2003-07-29 Thread Debian GLibc CVS Master
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:pb time: Tue Jul 29 13:36:59 MDT 2003 Log Message: add alpha-pwrite Files: changed:changelog -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/patches by pb

2003-07-29 Thread Debian GLibc CVS Master
Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches who:pb time: Tue Jul 29 13:36:59 MDT 2003 Log Message: add alpha-pwrite Files: changed:0list added: alpha-pwrite.dpatch -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/patches by pb

2003-07-29 Thread Debian GLibc CVS Master
Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches who:pb time: Tue Jul 29 13:21:45 MDT 2003 Log Message: add alpha-crti.dpatch require binutils 2.14.90.0.5-0.1 or later Files: changed:0list added: alpha-crti.dpatch -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a su

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by pb

2003-07-29 Thread Debian GLibc CVS Master
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:pb time: Tue Jul 29 13:21:45 MDT 2003 Log Message: add alpha-crti.dpatch require binutils 2.14.90.0.5-0.1 or later Files: changed:changelog control -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro

Bug#203324: unreproducible?

2003-07-29 Thread Joshua Kwan
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 09:01:47PM +0200, Harald Nordgård-Hansen wrote: > Sounds strange to me, but I tried dropping in > kernel-image-2.4.21-sparc32 (single-CPU box here), and it works > nicely. So it actually looks to be a kernel issue, yes. Or at the > least it is being masked by upgrading the

Processed: Re: Bug#203322: Acknowledgement (python2.2: Python fails with illegal instruction during postinst on sparc32)

2003-07-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 203322 libc6 Bug#203322: python2.2: Python fails with illegal instruction during postinst on sparc32 Bug reassigned from package `python2.2' to `libc6'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#203324: unreproducible?

2003-07-29 Thread Harald Nordgård-Hansen
Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I can't reproduce this bug on my SS10 at all. > ps works fine, and reportbug (hence python2.2) does too. > Got any specific @ARGV? Nope, just empty @ARGV. > BTW, this SS10 is running 2.4.21, kernel-image-2.4.21-sparc32-smp. It > might well be a kernel is

Bug#203324: unreproducible?

2003-07-29 Thread Joshua Kwan
I can't reproduce this bug on my SS10 at all. ps works fine, and reportbug (hence python2.2) does too. Got any specific @ARGV? BTW, this SS10 is running 2.4.21, kernel-image-2.4.21-sparc32-smp. It might well be a kernel issue? -Josh pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Processed: tags

2003-07-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 200356 glibc Bug#200356: console-tools: consolechars won't run Bug reassigned from package `console-tools' to `glibc'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adminis

Re: binutils upload

2003-07-29 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 10:04:47PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Jeff Bailey writes: > > That's why I sent you the message asking you about the binutils release > > from today. > > see http://ftp-master.debian.org/~doko/binutils/ > > but the installation fails. not yet sure why ... This seems t

Re: binutils upload

2003-07-29 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 10:04:47PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Jeff Bailey writes: > > That's why I sent you the message asking you about the binutils release > > from today. > > see http://ftp-master.debian.org/~doko/binutils/ > > but the installation fails. not yet sure why ... This seems t

Bug#203324: libc6: __strtod_internal fails with illegal instruction on sparc32.

2003-07-29 Thread Harald Nordgard-Hansen
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2-1 Severity: critical The subject says most of it, on this here SS10 both python2.2 and ps fail so far, the machine isn't all that usable at the moment... A gdb traceback indicates that __strtod_internal is the culprit. -Harald Nordgård-Hansen -- System Information

Bug#203324: libc6: __strtod_internal fails with illegal instruction on sparc32.

2003-07-29 Thread Harald Nordgard-Hansen
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2-1 Severity: critical The subject says most of it, on this here SS10 both python2.2 and ps fail so far, the machine isn't all that usable at the moment... A gdb traceback indicates that __strtod_internal is the culprit. -Harald Nordgård-Hansen -- System Information