patch), instead of
calling autoconf.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gcc-4.1
Version: 4.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
In the source package gcc-4.1, there is a typo in control.m4 that
causes the binary packages libgnatvsn-dev and libgnatprj-dev to depend
on nonexistent packages. Patch below.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--- control.m4
compile any project that uses
/usr/share/ada/adainclude/gnatprj.gpr. The package libgnatprj-dev is
not exactly unusable (as project files are not mandatory), but nearly
enough so that I think this is a serious bug.
The patch below corrects that. Proposed changelog entry:
[Ludovic Brenta]
* Fix a
have experienced the same ICE with several other packages. In all
cases, passing -O0 works around the problem.
This seems to be a problem with tree-ssa, but since GCC's bugzilla
does not seem to have a bug related to tree-dfa.c, maybe the Ada
front-end is the only one triggering this bug.
--
Ludo
Package: gnat-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-22
Severity: normal
In the following program, the declaration of T3 is illegal because it
extends a limited type (T1) and a nonlimited interface (T2).
-- compiled -gnat05
-- error not detected
package pak1 is
-- RM 3.9.4(12/2) and 7.5(6.1/2)
-- check that bo
Package: gnat-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-22
Severity: normal
In the program below, the full declaration of T2 (in the private part
of the package) is illegal because it conflicts with the public
declaration. The public declaration defines the discriminant, d1, to
have the value 3 whereas the private decl
Package: gnat-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-22
Severity: normal
In the program below, the full views (in the private part) of T2 and
T3 are both illegal because the value of the discriminant, x2, is not
static. RM 7.3(13) states that the parent subtype of T2 and T3
(i.e. T1) must impose a statically matchin
for all other packages affected?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
rld');
WriteLn
END hello.
$ gm2 -fiso hello.mod -o hello
$ ./hello
hello world
It seems that libm2pim.so lacks some necessary functions which
libm2iso.so has.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.3/adalib/libgnat.so
In addition, there should be symlinks to these files in /usr/lib.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
ainer field.
[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gcc-4.2/news/20071003T154032Z.html
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to
build the SJLJ version of libgnat).
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ludovic Brenta writes:
>> Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >> r2584 | lbrenta | 2007-10-09 23:46:21 +0200 (Di, 09 Okt 2007) | 1 line
>> >>
>> >> Do not run the test suite when buildi
range 0..7;
type T_A_B is record
A, B : Int_1;
end record;
pragma Pack(T_A_B);
type T_C is array (1..12) of T_A_B;
pragma Pack(T_C);
X : T_C;
begin
if X(1).B'Valid then
null;
end if;
end Test_Param;
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
Matthias, I just saw your commit to Subversion:
* Make 4.2.2-2 a requirement for frontends built from separate sources.
Addresses: #446596.
Could you please elaborate on why this change addresses the bug? Does
it affect gnat-4.2 too?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
t-4.2-4.2.2/build/gcc/ada/rts-static-zcx'
make[6]: *** [rts-static-zcx/libgnat.a] Error 2
make[6]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gnat-4.2-4.2.2/build/gcc/ada'
make[5]: *** [gnatlib-static-zcx] Error 2
make[5]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gnat-4.2-4.2.2/build/gcc/ada'
make[4]: *** [
Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A test build on mips succeeded for me, therefore mark as fixed.
Thanks a lot, Thiemo!
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> CCing Ludovic who is currently caring about the gnat packages
>
> Matthias
>
> Christian Joensson writes:
>> Hi Mattias.
>>
>> I understand that you look into gcc on sparc systems within the
>&
on of debian/control from debian/control.m4.
One approach to fix it is to remove debian/*FFI* from the first line
of the versioned-files rule in debian/rules.conf. Another is to
replace the existing lib*ffi4* files with more generic lib*FFI* files.
Matthias, what are your intentions?
--
Ludovic B
Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 27.1.2008, at 13.53, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>
>> Timo Sirainen writes:
>>> for (;;) {
>>> } while (xyz);
>>>
>>> gcc gives no kind of an error or warning. It just ignores the while
>>> ().
. Unfortunately, the ".0" is necessary to make
the next version "larger than" 4.3-20080127-1. OTOH, the next release
of GCC will indeed be 4.3.0, not 4.3.
We can implement this scheme with the next upload.
OK?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
green light for gnat-4.3.
Thanks
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ludovic Brenta writes:
>> I'd like to upload a new gnat-4.3 this weekend but I don't want it to
>> be broken by an upload of gcc-4.3 (with a different gcc-4.3-source
>> package) within the next few hours :) So, if
after. Thanks
> already for having delayed the upload.
OK, I'll merge your patch in and upload that.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
. An
obvious workaround is to not build in parallel (i.e. with make -j 1)
but GCC is such a large package that parallel builds are desirable.
Downgrading to important because the package has been auto-built
successfully on several architectures already.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
paths
where I build the three runtimes (rts-shared-zcx, rts-static-zcx and
rts-static-sjlj) instead of just rts. I have not yet found the time
to do that, but it is in the TODO file.
> Only really missing gnat targets for debian are arm and m68k, am I
> correct?
Yes; however we have n
evelop their packages
on such virtual boxes. I think I'll have to do that but have not yet
found the time either.
PS. Trimmed CC: to just debian-gcc, as Matthias, Aurelien and I are
all on that list.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
y Ada to 4.3, not any other languages.
Joerg, thanks for rejecting. I uploaded a corrected package which
will go to NEW because of libgnatvsn-dev and libgnatprj-dev.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to b-d on
gcc-3.4-base, etc. What files from these packages do we use during
the build of gcc-defaults?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
figuring in build-powerpc-linux-gnu/fixincludes
[...]
> checking whether gnatgcc supports -Wno-overlength-strings... yes
I am investigating but would welcome any help fixing this problem.
--
Ludovic Brenta (maintainer of gnat-4.3).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On other architectures such as amd64 and hppa,
build/fixincludes/configure correctly detects that gnatgcc does not
support -Wno-overlength-strings.
Architectures that fail also include sparc and s390 in addition to the
alrezady mentioned i386 and powerpc.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To
merge 471216 471192
thanks
Bastian, please check the BTS before submitting bugs. Thanks.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ple:
int
main ()
{
return 2 << 1000;
}
$ gnatgcc -c -Wno-overlength-strings conftest.c
conftest.c: In function 'main':
conftest.c:4: warning: left shift count >= width of type
At top level:
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-overlength-strings"
$ ec
yet (CCing him).
As a first step, since he now has a little time available, I've asked
him to separate the mips support into a patch independent of ada-sjlj.
That should make future submission to upstream easier.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
severity 474888 important
tags 474888 unreproducible
thanks
I just rebuilt on i386 without any problems, and the buildd also built
4.3.0-3 successfully (the problem with 4.3.0-4 was #465671; that's why
I rebuilt manually).
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
is available
there and the changes in 4.3.0-4 only affect mips and mipsel.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
needed are mips,
mipsel and alpha. For these architectures, please see #475365. In
fact, this blocks gcc-defaults from entering testing.
I'm planning to file an RM: bug as soon as a new gcc-defaults
(depending on gnat-4.3 on all archs) hits unstable.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCR
.
I've committed the necessary change in the Subversion repo but I will
not upload without approval. So, is it OK to upload now?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
retitle 247560 [Fixed in 4.4] gnat: Illegal program not detected, RM 13.11(15)
reassign 247560 gnat-4.3
retitle 248683 [Fixed in 4.4] gnat: Illegal program not detected, RM 13.1(6)
reassign 248683 gnat-4.3
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
I'd be happy to add support for ppc64 but this requires that gnat-4.3
is known to work on that architecture. Is that the case? I can't see
it on http://debian-ppc64.alioth.debian.org/buildd-logs.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
will file a separate bug report to the gnat-4.3 package with the
> necessary changes soon.
>
> Basically, the new ppc64-ada.dpatch will look like the current
> ada-mips.dpatch.
Great. Do you thing gcc-defaults depends on this new patch and should
therefore wait for it?
--
Ludovic Bren
Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 03:16:13PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>> Great. Do you thing gcc-defaults depends on this new patch and should
>> therefore wait for it?
>
> the current unstable version 1.70 of
f
-ifeq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH),ppc64))
+ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),ppc64)
no_packages += gnat
endif
Committed.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
Selon Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sam, Ludovic, some comments:
I'll take all the blame. Sam did submit the patches but I formatted them for
Debian and wrote the changelog entries.
> - please merge the changelog entries into the existing gcc-4.3
>entry.
> -
of #465671. Merging.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lucas, have you been able to reproduce this bug?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
m the trunk so they are
available in Lenny.
Also, I would like gcc-defaults 1.70 to migrate to testing so that
gnat-4.3 is the default on all architectures.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
pgp1Ntc45sa7b.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> On 26/04/08 at 01:50 +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>> Lucas, have you been able to reproduce this bug?
>
> No, gnat-4.3 still fails, but not this way (#477964).
Then I suggest closing this bug and concentrating on #477964. OK?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
Matthias Klose writes:
> Lucas Nussbaum writes:
>> On 26/04/08 at 01:47 +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>> > severity 477964 important
>> > tags 477964 moreinfo
>> > merge 477964 465671
>> > thanks
>> >
>> > I built the package built s
retitle 248173 [Fixed in 4.4] Legal program rejected, RM 7.3(13)
reassign 248173 gnat-4.3
tags 248173 fixed-upstream pending
thanks
Fixed in GCC 4.4 and backported to gnat-4.3 by Samuel Tardieu. Thanks
so much, Sam.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
pgpBhkkgsmbEJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
upstream, now that gnat-4.3 is the
default Ada compiler.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reassign 248173 gnat-4.3
retitle 248173 [Fixed in 4.4] Legal program rejected, RM 7.3(13)
tags 248173 pending
thanks
Samuel Tardieu backported this fix to gnat-4.3; pending upload.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
tags 482433 pending
thanks
Thanks Thiemo, I've applied your patch and will upload it as soon as I
can get the tests suite to work.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Selon Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ah, Ludovic, in order to migrate gcc-defaults I'm going to need to
> remove libaws from testing. I read in some bug report that you're
> planning to update it to a newer gnat, so after that it should be able
> to migrate to te
comes up.
Thanks
--
Ludovic Brenta (maintainer of gnat-4.*).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Read debian/README.maintainers for instructions on how to use quilt
with gnat-4.3.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gnat-4.3 has been executing the Ada test suite since 4.3.0-6 and I would like to
send the results upstream. Is there an automated procedure for this or is it an
entirely manual process?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Package: libgnatprj4.3-dev
Version: 4.3.1-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
The file /usr/share/ada/adainclude/gnatprj/sdefault.ads is missing
from package libgnatprj4.3-dev, so the package is unusable. Here is
the patch that corrects this problem:
---
debian/patches/ada-libgnatprj.dpatchebdd53f
r manually compiled gcc installations there is a libgnat.so in that
directory.
OK, I'll fix that. I have a couple other fixes in the pipeline, too,
and I was planning to upload 4.3.1-2 next week anyway.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
se. Not to mention that it would be against
Debian policy to provide a static library compiled with -fPIC.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nd then to Lenny. The changelog
is against gnat-4.3 4.3.0-1 which was built from the same sources as gcc-4.3
4.3.0-2. I have the option to merge the changes from gcc-4.3 into gnat-4.3.
Should I do this?
Here is the changelog entry:
gnat-4.3 (4.3.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
[Ludovic Brenta]
* Add sd
s.Line.all);
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 494962 pending
thanks
I uploaded 4.3.1-2 yesterday; since it will be build with 4.3.1-1 as the
bootstrap compiler, I believe the bug will be resolved then.
It would be nice if you could investigate the bug further. Does it happen on
other architectures?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To
-1;
4.3.0-1 was built using 4.1.2-20.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
subscribing to the bug you will be notified of all these changes
automatically.
At this point I would like to know whether this bug exists in upstream GCC.
There has been a similar but not identical bug in the past (see
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR32452).
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnat-4.3/+bug/250173
I recommend that the symbolic link be provided in gcc-4.3-base instead.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fix is to acknowledge the new upstream version number in the
package (i.e. 4.3.2~rc1-1, or even 4.3.2-1 with another update), and
request a new upload of gnat-4.3 to match. I'll be happy to do the
latter.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
Matthias Klose writes:
> please find gcc-4.3.2 at http://people.debian.org/~doko/gcc-4.3/
> changes are found in svn as well.
>
> Ludovic, please could you check the gnat source package with these
> changes?
These sources seem OK, except that ada-alpha.dpatch is now applied
upstrea
g/debian-gcc/2008/09/msg00027.html
Thanks for unblocking!
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is this bug specific to hppa?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
prove that this is
really an upstream bug in the build machinery; stage 2 should not depend
on the bootstrap environment at all.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
propriately.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
ease tell me if that solves your problem. You should not have
to specify any libgnat.a or libgnat-4.3.so by hand; gnatmake is
supposed to do that for you.
HTH
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe&q
Matthias, are you planning for this to reach testing? Should I upload
gnat-4.3 to match the new upstream version?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Matthias Klose writes:
> Ludovic Brenta schrieb:
>> Matthias, are you planning for this to reach testing? Should I upload
>> gnat-4.3 to match the new upstream version?
>
> yes please. just have to wait for the gcj-4.3 build, if it succeeds on armel.
> could you check for
least one cross-compiler package. The first target I will try
to support is arm.
Of course, any help is welcome on this font :)
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hector Oron writes:
> Hello Ludovic,
>
> I would be interested on making cross toolchains to build. I have
> already been doing some work on them.
>
> Please, just let me know what the changes you are doing with
> repositories or i would not mind to use yours. I just mostl
ike multilib. It seems that
we could achieve the effects you want with a single compiler and multiple
run-time libraries and compilation options. If I am correct then it
should be possible to leverage GCC's existing multilib support and
produce binary packages for several libraries. Am I missi
with:
=== gnat Summary ===
# of expected passes401
# of expected failures 3
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
la/show_bug.cgi?id=5911
>
> Also reported:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37703
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32548
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39172
>
> Thanks in advance,
Again thanks for the references.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
thias,
Thanks a lot for posting these results.
Do they mean that #501883 (gnat build failure with debian gnat) is no
longer applicable?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
e pbuilder chroot, contrary to what apt says. To see what
happened, I need the log file of configure. Could you please attach
/tmp/gnat-4.3_z8FHTS/gnat-4.3-4.3.3.orig/build/config.log to this bug
report? Thanks.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.
rresponding object file. In your case, something went wrong; either
gnatgcc failed to produce an object file, or it emitted an error message
on stderr. On my machine, the test succeeds.
I hope you can take it from there to see what's wrong.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
pgpFs2ACbECJw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Matthias, could you please explain what was the problem precisely and
what happened in 4.3.3-8 that solved the issue? I need to know because
of #527367 which the submitter claims has similar causes and solution.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ
).
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
ignoring the
result of a function call but allows them to import C functions
(returning other than void) as procedures.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
No, your test does not correspond to the bug; please try with the exact code to
reproduce the bug (i.e. "new pak1.pak2", not "new pak1").
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe&q
atched as it should.
This is not a big problem. Workaround: install package gcc; this does
not affect compilation of Ada packages, only linking shared libraries
from project files.
I'll update the patches to correct this problem in the next upload.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
ve it high
priority.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Selon Hector Oron :
> Those are more or less my plans, but there was Ludovic Brenta also
> interested on having a gnat cross compiler for armel, which I am unsure
> if there has been any progress towards this direction.
Some progress: gnat-4.4 is now in unstable. I would like to p
Selon Hector Oron :
> 2009/8/12 Ludovic Brenta :
>> What kind of target do you have in mind? armel bare-board? with uClibc?
>> with EmDebian? with full Debian?
>
> I personally do not know a bit on ada, I should learn sometime, as I
> have heard it is very suitable for sa
OK, good idea.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
actions.
* exp_ch3.adb: Minor reformatting
To be backported.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/a175509a27540b27d84f938d49c8b...@localhost
severity 589164 important
found 589164 4.4.0-1
thanks
The patch I identified does not fix the problem. Since I think this is
important, I'm bisecting to find the patch that does fix the problem;
then I'll backport it.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
The bisection pointed to the very patch I identified earlier; however,
backporting this patch alone does not fix the problem in 4.4.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
4.5.
This really gives me the creeps.
I would propose that gcc-4.5 be allowed in testing, with priority extra,
but not that the "several runtime libraries" (which ones are they?) be
built from the gcc-4.5 sources.
Would that be acceptable to everyone?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUB
s would gcc-4.5 bring to our users?
Right: gcc-4.5 is "nice to have", maybe even "very, very nice to have",
but it does not fix any RC bugs and _might_ introduce some due to
replacing important libraries from gcc-4.4. So, I support the release
manager's decision not to inc
tags 595830 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
I just rebuilt successfully on sid. I suspect your disk became full
suring compilation?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Lucas, any update on this? I'm tempted to close it now.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8a3570f7588065
, so I think it is
suitable for testing. I have uploaded 4.4.5-1 to unstable with low
priority. Please unblock the package so that 4.4.5-1 can migrate to
Squeeze after its normal period in unstable.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
1 - 100 of 339 matches
Mail list logo
