Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 03:16:13PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>> Great. Do you thing gcc-defaults depends on this new patch and should
>> therefore wait for it?
>
> the current unstable version 1.70 of the 'gcc-defaults' package FTBFS
> on ppc64 anyway at the moment because "no_packages = gnat" is missing
> for ppc64, but the gnat packages do not have ppc64 in their architecture
> lines.
>
> Consequently, I do not think this gcc-defaults patch needs to wait for
> the gnat-4.3 patch.
>
> The newly built "gnat" package will obviously be usable only when
> the gnat-4.3 package becomes available.
>
> But 'gcc-defaults' will at least not FTBFS on ppc64 anymore.
As I learned the hard way, it is a bad idea to try to build gnat
before gnat-4.3 is available. Therefore I just committed this patch
to gcc-defaults. The moment you produce gnat-4.3 for ppc64, I'll add
support for it in gcc-defaults.
Note that I'm not going to upload gcc-defaults without doko's
approval.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
Index: debian/changelog
===================================================================
--- debian/changelog (révision 3018)
+++ debian/changelog (copie de travail)
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+gcc-defaults (1.71) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ [Ludovic Brenta]
+ * Do not build gnat on ppc64 until such time as gnat-4.3 is available
+ on this architecture. Closes: #476812.
+
+ -- Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:47:50 +0200
+
gcc-defaults (1.70) unstable; urgency=low
[Matthias Klose]
Index: debian/rules
===================================================================
--- debian/rules (révision 3018)
+++ debian/rules (copie de travail)
@@ -256,6 +256,10 @@
no_packages += gcc-spu g++-spu gfortran-spu
endif
+ifeq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH),ppc64))
+ no_packages += gnat
+endif
+
ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),s390)
endif
