for all other packages affected?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
rld');
WriteLn
END hello.
$ gm2 -fiso hello.mod -o hello
$ ./hello
hello world
It seems that libm2pim.so lacks some necessary functions which
libm2iso.so has.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.3/adalib/libgnat.so
In addition, there should be symlinks to these files in /usr/lib.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
ainer field.
[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gcc-4.2/news/20071003T154032Z.html
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to
build the SJLJ version of libgnat).
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ludovic Brenta writes:
>> Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >> r2584 | lbrenta | 2007-10-09 23:46:21 +0200 (Di, 09 Okt 2007) | 1 line
>> >>
>> >> Do not run the test suite when buildi
range 0..7;
type T_A_B is record
A, B : Int_1;
end record;
pragma Pack(T_A_B);
type T_C is array (1..12) of T_A_B;
pragma Pack(T_C);
X : T_C;
begin
if X(1).B'Valid then
null;
end if;
end Test_Param;
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
Matthias, I just saw your commit to Subversion:
* Make 4.2.2-2 a requirement for frontends built from separate sources.
Addresses: #446596.
Could you please elaborate on why this change addresses the bug? Does
it affect gnat-4.2 too?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
t-4.2-4.2.2/build/gcc/ada/rts-static-zcx'
make[6]: *** [rts-static-zcx/libgnat.a] Error 2
make[6]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gnat-4.2-4.2.2/build/gcc/ada'
make[5]: *** [gnatlib-static-zcx] Error 2
make[5]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gnat-4.2-4.2.2/build/gcc/ada'
make[4]: *** [
Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A test build on mips succeeded for me, therefore mark as fixed.
Thanks a lot, Thiemo!
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
applications really can benefit from being in 64-bit
mode..."
So I would like to ask: why do you think creating a 64-bit version of
gnat is worth the effort? I have personally never seen gnat use more
than 340 Mb of RAM, and that's running 64-bit on an amd64 system.
If you think the
on of debian/control from debian/control.m4.
One approach to fix it is to remove debian/*FFI* from the first line
of the versioned-files rule in debian/rules.conf. Another is to
replace the existing lib*ffi4* files with more generic lib*FFI* files.
Matthias, what are your intentions?
--
Ludovic B
Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 27.1.2008, at 13.53, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>
>> Timo Sirainen writes:
>>> for (;;) {
>>> } while (xyz);
>>>
>>> gcc gives no kind of an error or warning. It just ignores the while
>>> ().
. Unfortunately, the ".0" is necessary to make
the next version "larger than" 4.3-20080127-1. OTOH, the next release
of GCC will indeed be 4.3.0, not 4.3.
We can implement this scheme with the next upload.
OK?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
green light for gnat-4.3.
Thanks
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ludovic Brenta writes:
>> I'd like to upload a new gnat-4.3 this weekend but I don't want it to
>> be broken by an upload of gcc-4.3 (with a different gcc-4.3-source
>> package) within the next few hours :) So, if
after. Thanks
> already for having delayed the upload.
OK, I'll merge your patch in and upload that.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
. An
obvious workaround is to not build in parallel (i.e. with make -j 1)
but GCC is such a large package that parallel builds are desirable.
Downgrading to important because the package has been auto-built
successfully on several architectures already.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
paths
where I build the three runtimes (rts-shared-zcx, rts-static-zcx and
rts-static-sjlj) instead of just rts. I have not yet found the time
to do that, but it is in the TODO file.
> Only really missing gnat targets for debian are arm and m68k, am I
> correct?
Yes; however we have n
evelop their packages
on such virtual boxes. I think I'll have to do that but have not yet
found the time either.
PS. Trimmed CC: to just debian-gcc, as Matthias, Aurelien and I are
all on that list.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
y Ada to 4.3, not any other languages.
Joerg, thanks for rejecting. I uploaded a corrected package which
will go to NEW because of libgnatvsn-dev and libgnatprj-dev.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to b-d on
gcc-3.4-base, etc. What files from these packages do we use during
the build of gcc-defaults?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
figuring in build-powerpc-linux-gnu/fixincludes
[...]
> checking whether gnatgcc supports -Wno-overlength-strings... yes
I am investigating but would welcome any help fixing this problem.
--
Ludovic Brenta (maintainer of gnat-4.3).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On other architectures such as amd64 and hppa,
build/fixincludes/configure correctly detects that gnatgcc does not
support -Wno-overlength-strings.
Architectures that fail also include sparc and s390 in addition to the
alrezady mentioned i386 and powerpc.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To
merge 471216 471192
thanks
Bastian, please check the BTS before submitting bugs. Thanks.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ple:
int
main ()
{
return 2 << 1000;
}
$ gnatgcc -c -Wno-overlength-strings conftest.c
conftest.c: In function 'main':
conftest.c:4: warning: left shift count >= width of type
At top level:
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-overlength-strings"
$ ec
yet (CCing him).
As a first step, since he now has a little time available, I've asked
him to separate the mips support into a patch independent of ada-sjlj.
That should make future submission to upstream easier.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
severity 474888 important
tags 474888 unreproducible
thanks
I just rebuilt on i386 without any problems, and the buildd also built
4.3.0-3 successfully (the problem with 4.3.0-4 was #465671; that's why
I rebuilt manually).
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
is available
there and the changes in 4.3.0-4 only affect mips and mipsel.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
needed are mips,
mipsel and alpha. For these architectures, please see #475365. In
fact, this blocks gcc-defaults from entering testing.
I'm planning to file an RM: bug as soon as a new gcc-defaults
(depending on gnat-4.3 on all archs) hits unstable.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCR
.
I've committed the necessary change in the Subversion repo but I will
not upload without approval. So, is it OK to upload now?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
retitle 247560 [Fixed in 4.4] gnat: Illegal program not detected, RM 13.11(15)
reassign 247560 gnat-4.3
retitle 248683 [Fixed in 4.4] gnat: Illegal program not detected, RM 13.1(6)
reassign 248683 gnat-4.3
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
I'd be happy to add support for ppc64 but this requires that gnat-4.3
is known to work on that architecture. Is that the case? I can't see
it on http://debian-ppc64.alioth.debian.org/buildd-logs.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
will file a separate bug report to the gnat-4.3 package with the
> necessary changes soon.
>
> Basically, the new ppc64-ada.dpatch will look like the current
> ada-mips.dpatch.
Great. Do you thing gcc-defaults depends on this new patch and should
therefore wait for it?
--
Ludovic Bren
Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 03:16:13PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>> Great. Do you thing gcc-defaults depends on this new patch and should
>> therefore wait for it?
>
> the current unstable version 1.70 of
f
-ifeq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH),ppc64))
+ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),ppc64)
no_packages += gnat
endif
Committed.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
o as you suggest and also see if my latest
upload (gnat-4.3 4.3.0-5) was affected by this.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of #465671. Merging.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lucas, have you been able to reproduce this bug?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
m the trunk so they are
available in Lenny.
Also, I would like gcc-defaults 1.70 to migrate to testing so that
gnat-4.3 is the default on all architectures.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
pgp1Ntc45sa7b.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> On 26/04/08 at 01:50 +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>> Lucas, have you been able to reproduce this bug?
>
> No, gnat-4.3 still fails, but not this way (#477964).
Then I suggest closing this bug and concentrating on #477964. OK?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
Matthias Klose writes:
> Lucas Nussbaum writes:
>> On 26/04/08 at 01:47 +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>> > severity 477964 important
>> > tags 477964 moreinfo
>> > merge 477964 465671
>> > thanks
>> >
>> > I built the package built s
retitle 248173 [Fixed in 4.4] Legal program rejected, RM 7.3(13)
reassign 248173 gnat-4.3
tags 248173 fixed-upstream pending
thanks
Fixed in GCC 4.4 and backported to gnat-4.3 by Samuel Tardieu. Thanks
so much, Sam.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
pgpBhkkgsmbEJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
upstream, now that gnat-4.3 is the
default Ada compiler.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reassign 248173 gnat-4.3
retitle 248173 [Fixed in 4.4] Legal program rejected, RM 7.3(13)
tags 248173 pending
thanks
Samuel Tardieu backported this fix to gnat-4.3; pending upload.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
tags 482433 pending
thanks
Thanks Thiemo, I've applied your patch and will upload it as soon as I
can get the tests suite to work.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sting again, okay?
Sure, no problem.
gnat-4.3 (4.3.0-6) was, I hope, my last upload and I would like it to be in
lenny. It's a bit young for that but I'll allow it to migrate to testing in due
course.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
comes up.
Thanks
--
Ludovic Brenta (maintainer of gnat-4.*).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Read debian/README.maintainers for instructions on how to use quilt
with gnat-4.3.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gnat-4.3 has been executing the Ada test suite since 4.3.0-6 and I would like to
send the results upstream. Is there an automated procedure for this or is it an
entirely manual process?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Package: libgnatprj4.3-dev
Version: 4.3.1-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
The file /usr/share/ada/adainclude/gnatprj/sdefault.ads is missing
from package libgnatprj4.3-dev, so the package is unusable. Here is
the patch that corrects this problem:
---
debian/patches/ada-libgnatprj.dpatchebdd53f
r manually compiled gcc installations there is a libgnat.so in that
directory.
OK, I'll fix that. I have a couple other fixes in the pipeline, too,
and I was planning to upload 4.3.1-2 next week anyway.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
se. Not to mention that it would be against
Debian policy to provide a static library compiled with -fPIC.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nd then to Lenny. The changelog
is against gnat-4.3 4.3.0-1 which was built from the same sources as gcc-4.3
4.3.0-2. I have the option to merge the changes from gcc-4.3 into gnat-4.3.
Should I do this?
Here is the changelog entry:
gnat-4.3 (4.3.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
[Ludovic Brenta]
* Add sd
s.Line.all);
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 494962 pending
thanks
I uploaded 4.3.1-2 yesterday; since it will be build with 4.3.1-1 as the
bootstrap compiler, I believe the bug will be resolved then.
It would be nice if you could investigate the bug further. Does it happen on
other architectures?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To
-1;
4.3.0-1 was built using 4.1.2-20.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
subscribing to the bug you will be notified of all these changes
automatically.
At this point I would like to know whether this bug exists in upstream GCC.
There has been a similar but not identical bug in the past (see
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR32452).
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnat-4.3/+bug/250173
I recommend that the symbolic link be provided in gcc-4.3-base instead.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fix is to acknowledge the new upstream version number in the
package (i.e. 4.3.2~rc1-1, or even 4.3.2-1 with another update), and
request a new upload of gnat-4.3 to match. I'll be happy to do the
latter.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
7;t like the changes,
feel free to ignore them in your upload (i.e. upload r3239).
> Arthur, please could you check the spu package with these changes?
>
> I'm currently testing these packages on amd64/i386/powerpc (both gcc
> and gcj).
Building now on amd64 and i386.
--
Ludovic B
g/debian-gcc/2008/09/msg00027.html
Thanks for unblocking!
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is this bug specific to hppa?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
prove that this is
really an upstream bug in the build machinery; stage 2 should not depend
on the bootstrap environment at all.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
propriately.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
ease tell me if that solves your problem. You should not have
to specify any libgnat.a or libgnat-4.3.so by hand; gnatmake is
supposed to do that for you.
HTH
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe&q
Matthias, are you planning for this to reach testing? Should I upload
gnat-4.3 to match the new upstream version?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Matthias Klose writes:
> Ludovic Brenta schrieb:
>> Matthias, are you planning for this to reach testing? Should I upload
>> gnat-4.3 to match the new upstream version?
>
> yes please. just have to wait for the gcj-4.3 build, if it succeeds on armel.
> could you check for
least one cross-compiler package. The first target I will try
to support is arm.
Of course, any help is welcome on this font :)
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
arm.
>>
>> Of course, any help is welcome on this font :)
>
> I shall try to help in this way.
Thanks a lot.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
ike multilib. It seems that
we could achieve the effects you want with a single compiler and multiple
run-time libraries and compilation options. If I am correct then it
should be possible to leverage GCC's existing multilib support and
produce binary packages for several libraries. Am I missi
with:
=== gnat Summary ===
# of expected passes401
# of expected failures 3
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
la/show_bug.cgi?id=5911
>
> Also reported:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37703
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32548
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39172
>
> Thanks in advance,
Again thanks for the references.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
thias,
Thanks a lot for posting these results.
Do they mean that #501883 (gnat build failure with debian gnat) is no
longer applicable?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
e pbuilder chroot, contrary to what apt says. To see what
happened, I need the log file of configure. Could you please attach
/tmp/gnat-4.3_z8FHTS/gnat-4.3-4.3.3.orig/build/config.log to this bug
report? Thanks.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.
rresponding object file. In your case, something went wrong; either
gnatgcc failed to produce an object file, or it emitted an error message
on stderr. On my machine, the test succeeds.
I hope you can take it from there to see what's wrong.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
pgpFs2ACbECJw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Matthias, could you please explain what was the problem precisely and
what happened in 4.3.3-8 that solved the issue? I need to know because
of #527367 which the submitter claims has similar causes and solution.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ
).
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
ignoring the
result of a function call but allows them to import C functions
(returning other than void) as procedures.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
No, your test does not correspond to the bug; please try with the exact code to
reproduce the bug (i.e. "new pak1.pak2", not "new pak1").
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe&q
atched as it should.
This is not a big problem. Workaround: install package gcc; this does
not affect compilation of Ada packages, only linking shared libraries
from project files.
I'll update the patches to correct this problem in the next upload.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
ve it high
priority.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Selon Hector Oron :
> Those are more or less my plans, but there was Ludovic Brenta also
> interested on having a gnat cross compiler for armel, which I am unsure
> if there has been any progress towards this direction.
Some progress: gnat-4.4 is now in unstable. I would like to p
Selon Hector Oron :
> 2009/8/12 Ludovic Brenta :
>> What kind of target do you have in mind? armel bare-board? with uClibc?
>> with EmDebian? with full Debian?
>
> I personally do not know a bit on ada, I should learn sometime, as I
> have heard it is very suitable for sa
OK, good idea.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
actions.
* exp_ch3.adb: Minor reformatting
To be backported.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/a175509a27540b27d84f938d49c8b...@localhost
severity 589164 important
found 589164 4.4.0-1
thanks
The patch I identified does not fix the problem. Since I think this is
important, I'm bisecting to find the patch that does fix the problem;
then I'll backport it.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
The bisection pointed to the very patch I identified earlier; however,
backporting this patch alone does not fix the problem in 4.4.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
4.5.
This really gives me the creeps.
I would propose that gcc-4.5 be allowed in testing, with priority extra,
but not that the "several runtime libraries" (which ones are they?) be
built from the gcc-4.5 sources.
Would that be acceptable to everyone?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUB
s would gcc-4.5 bring to our users?
Right: gcc-4.5 is "nice to have", maybe even "very, very nice to have",
but it does not fix any RC bugs and _might_ introduce some due to
replacing important libraries from gcc-4.4. So, I support the release
manager's decision not to inc
tags 595830 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
I just rebuilt successfully on sid. I suspect your disk became full
suring compilation?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Lucas, any update on this? I'm tempted to close it now.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8a3570f7588065
, so I think it is
suitable for testing. I have uploaded 4.4.5-1 to unstable with low
priority. Please unblock the package so that 4.4.5-1 can migrate to
Squeeze after its normal period in unstable.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
platforms; unfortunately
it FTBFS on s390 and armel. I have not yet had time to investigate why.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.
can help prevent
future FTBFS on armel.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2c945b91a4e6dddcf0d40283096b2...@localhost
les are unchanged, thus
preserving compatibility with all the existing -dev packages that depend on
gnat-4.4.
PS. Thanks to Matthias Klose for building on armel and s390, these two
buildd failed for reasons external to the package.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
Luk Claes writes:
> On 10/11/2010 02:26 PM, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>>
>> Dear release managers,
>>
>> Because gcc-4.4 (>=4.4.5) is now in Squeeze, gnat-4.4 (=4.4.4-5) no longer
>> builds from source. An updated gnat-4.4 package (merging all the packaging
>
he
needs help, then I'm pessimistic about armel.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/a9d7cd11ab9ed273bb653b3da1c4c...@localhost
this bug never to be fixed
in gcc-snapshot. Instead, you can expect a future gnat-4.5 or gnat-4.6
with proper support for symbolic tracebacks. If you would like to help,
please contact me.
--
Ludovic Brenta (Debian gnat maintainer).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ
> 3 березня 2011 о 21:07 +0100 Ludovic Brenta написав(-ла):
>> This is because the patch ada-symbolic-tracebacks.diff has not been
>> ported to gcc-snapshot.
> I see that this patch is present in gcc-snapshot source, and it is
> even applied (at least at the beginning of the build,
1 - 100 of 327 matches
Mail list logo
