Bug#442279: closed by Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: gcc-4.2: parameter '-std=gnu99' is ignored)

Debian Bug Tracking System schrieb: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > which was filed against the gcc-4.2 package: > > #442279: gcc-4.2: parameter '-std=gnu99' is ignored > > It has been closed by Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > Their explanation is attached

Processed: retitle gfortran report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 401496 [fixed in 4.3] gfortran-4.1 bug / ICE in gfc_conv_constant at > fortran-trans-const.c:348 Bug#401496: gfortran-4.1 bug / ICE in gfc_conv_constant at fortran-trans-const.c:348 Changed Bug title to `[fixed in 4.3] gfortran-4.1 bug / ICE i

Processed: retitle gcc report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 356316 [fixed in 4.3] [PR 7302] g++-4.0: -Wnon-virtual-dtor and -Wall > produce false warnings Bug#356316: [PR 7302] g++-4.0: -Wnon-virtual-dtor and -Wall produce false warnings Changed Bug title to `[fixed in 4.3] [PR 7302] g++-4.0: -Wnon-vir

Processed: reassign, binutils bug according to port maintainer

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 375519 binutils Bug#375519: [m68k] Assembler: FATAL: can't close cl_MI.o: No error Bug reassigned from package `gcc-4.1' to `binutils'. > reassign 388000 cln Bug number 388000 not found. (Is it archived?) > thanks Stopping processing here. P

Processed (with 1 errors): forwarded gcc report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded http://gcc.gnu.org/PR33448 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > retitle 439687 [PR33448] [4.1/4.2/4.3] ICE in create_tmp_var, at > gimplify.c:487 Bug#439687: [PR33448] [4.1/4.2/4.3] ICE in create_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:487 C

Processed: forwarded gcc report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 439687 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR33448 Bug#439687: gcc ICE on flex input, in create_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:410 Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR33448. > retitle 439687 [PR33448] [4.1/4.2/4.3] ICE in create_t

Processed: Re: [s390] g++-4.1.2-14 ICE when buildling dcmtk-3.5.4-3 package

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 435736 + moreinfo Bug#435736: [s390] g++-4.1.2-14 ICE when buildling dcmtk-3.5.4-3 package There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admini

Bug#435736: [s390] g++-4.1.2-14 ICE when buildling dcmtk-3.5.4-3 package

tag 435736 + moreinfo thanks Please recheck with 4.2 and 4.3/snapshot. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#433447: Segmentation fault on compilation of kernel

tag 433447 + moreinfo thanks Martin Michlmayr writes: > * Patrick Winnertz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-17 14:50]: > > I've tried today to compile the linux-source-2.6.18 with this compiler and > > it failed with this output: > > > > fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c: In function ?dlm_mig_lockres_worke

Processed: forwarded gcc report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 436013 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11078 Bug#436013: Attempting to use BOOST_TYPEOF_TPL() as template function return type causes an internal compiler error. Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11078. > retitle

Bug#433301: gcc-4.1: default target of -M generated rule lacks path

tag 433301 + moreinfo thanks - you cite -MT, but use -MM, is that really what you mean? - please recheck with 4.2 and 4.3/snapshot Lionel Elie Mamane writes: > Package: gcc-4.1 > Version: 4.1.2-13 > Severity: normal > > "info --node '(gcc.info.gz)Preprocessor Options'" says: > > `-MT TARGET'

Processed: Re: Bug#433301: gcc-4.1: default target of -M generated rule lacks path

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 433301 + moreinfo Bug#433301: gcc-4.1: default target of -M generated rule lacks path There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrat

[Bug middle-end/33448] [4.1/4.2/4.3] ICE in create_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:487

--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-16 15:08 --- This code is invalid. The enum type is not declared. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33448 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter

[Bug middle-end/33448] [4.1/4.2/4.3] ICE in create_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:487

--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-16 15:09 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 32295 *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c/32295] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] An invalid c code causes an ICE in create_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:489

--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-16 15:09 --- *** Bug 33448 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug middle-end/33448] [4.1/4.2/4.3] ICE in create_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:487

--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-16 15:12 --- static enum parsedb pa_flags; I think parsedb really should parsedbflags here but I could be wrong. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33448 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- Yo

Bug#425343: [arm] gcc-4.1: bad code and no warning for thumb assembly of arm instruction

tag 425343 + moreinfo thanks please recheck with 4.2 and 4.3/snapshot John Reiser writes: > Subject: [arm] gcc-4.1: bad code and no warning for thumb assembly of arm > instruction > Package: gcc-4.1 > Version: 4.1.1-21 > Severity: normal > > *** Please type your report below this line *** > The

Processed: Re: Bug#425343: [arm] gcc-4.1: bad code and no warning for thumb assembly of arm instruction

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 425343 + moreinfo Bug#425343: [arm] gcc-4.1: bad code and no warning for thumb assembly of arm instruction There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug track

Processed: Re: Bug#423156: ext/codecvt_specializations.h is not -Wall clean

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 423156 + moreinfo Bug#423156: ext/codecvt_specializations.h is not -Wall clean There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adm

Bug#423156: ext/codecvt_specializations.h is not -Wall clean

tag 423156 + moreinfo thanks Jens-Wolfhard Schicke writes: > Package: libstdc++6-4.1-dev > Version: 4.1.2-6 > > In Line 246ff, it says: > >explicit >codecvt(state_type& __enc, size_t __refs = 0) >: __codecvt_abstract_base state_type>(__refs) >{ } > > Using -Wall,

Bug#421737: gcc-4.1: binaries created on sid generate "floating point error" on etch

tag 421737 + moreinfo thanks jlueters writes: > Package: gcc-4.1 > Version: 4.1.2-5 > Severity: normal > > After doing a apt-get upgrade (2007-04-30), binaries generated on a sid > (unstable) system do emit a > "floating point error" on etch and do not start at all. > The sid system ist amd , t

Bug#420189: marked as done (g++-4.1: fails to compile correct template code - 4.1.[01] regression)

Your message dated Sun, 16 Sep 2007 17:46:03 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#420189: g++-4.1: fails to compile correct template code - 4.1.[01] regression has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#418795: gcc-4.1: profiling (-pg) FPU bound application using -funsafe-math-optimizations yields incorrect timing

tag 418795 + moreinfo thanks please recheck with gcc-4.2 and gcc-4.3/gcc-snapshot Wouter Koolen-Wijkstra writes: > Package: gcc-4.1 > Version: 4.1.1-21 > Severity: normal > > > I am profiling an application that performs a lot of log2(.) operations. I > wanted to use > -funsafe-math-optimizati

Processed: Re: Bug#419562: gcc-4.1: dummy scanf needed

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 419562 + moreinfo Bug#419562: gcc-4.1: dummy scanf needed There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bu

Bug#419562: gcc-4.1: dummy scanf needed

tag 419562 + moreinfo thanks Nicolas Patrois writes: > Package: gcc-4.1 > Version: 4.1.1-21 > Severity: normal > > > When I try to compile the following code, I need the fourth scanf("%i",&k); > if not, the expo variable equals 0. > This bug appears in gcc 4.0 and gcc 4.1 but not in gcc 3.3.

Processed: Re: Bug#421737: gcc-4.1: binaries created on sid generate "floating point error" on etch

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 421737 + moreinfo Bug#421737: gcc-4.1: binaries created on sid generate "floating point error" on etch There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#407053: marked as done (gcc-4.1 / s390 64-bit libs in wrong location)

Your message dated Sun, 16 Sep 2007 17:59:20 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gcc-4.1 / s390 64-bit libs in wrong location has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Processed: Re: gcc-4.1: cross build failure: debug package not built when cross compiling

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 414099 + moreinfo Bug#414099: gcc-4.1: cross build failure: debug package not built when cross compiling There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug trackin

Processed: Re: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 404377 [cross] Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Bug#404377: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Changed Bug title to `[cross] Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES' from `Link tests are not allow

Bug#414099: gcc-4.1: cross build failure: debug package not built when cross compiling

tag 414099 + moreinfo thanks please recheck if this is still the case with current 4.1 and 4.2 sources. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#406442: Incorrect SSE2 code generated for vector initialization by cast from non-constant array

tag 406442 + moreinfo thanks please recheck with gcc-4.2 gcc-4.3/gcc-snapshot Geoffrey Reynolds writes: > Package: gcc-4.1 > Version: 4.1.1-21 > > --- begin bug.c --- > typedef long long v2di __attribute__ ((vector_size(16))); > extern long long x(void); > extern long long y(void); > > v2di tes

Processed: Re: Bug#406442: Incorrect SSE2 code generated for vector initialization by cast from non-constant array

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 406442 + moreinfo Bug#406442: Incorrect SSE2 code generated for vector initialization by cast from non-constant array There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debia

Bug#404377: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

retitle 404377 [cross] Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES tag 404377 + moreinfo thanks please recheck with gcc-4.1/gcc-4.2/gcc-snapshot from current unstable -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#395837: g++-4.1: dynamic_cast returns different results based on the order of bases

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 395837 + moreinfo Bug#395837: g++-4.1: dynamic_cast returns different results based on the order of bases There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracki

Bug#395837: g++-4.1: dynamic_cast returns different results based on the order of bases

tag 395837 + moreinfo thanks please recheck with gcc-4.2/gcc-snapshot from current unstable and/or forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Vladimir Grebinskiy writes: > Package:g++-4.1 > Version:4.1.1-18 > > What should dynamic_cast return if we have virtual base class that is > first derived publicly, the

Bug#435736: [s390] g++-4.1.2-14 ICE when buildling dcmtk-3.5.4-3 package

On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 05:09:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Please recheck with 4.2 and 4.3/snapshot. Works with 4.2. Bastian -- Without freedom of choice there is no creativity. -- Kirk, "The return of the Archons", stardate 3157.4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P

Bug#357944: marked as done (g++-4.0: g++ compiles invalid code for object instantiation like "MyClass obj(obj); ")

Your message dated Sun, 16 Sep 2007 18:23:34 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#357944: g++-4.0: g++ compiles invalid code for object instantiation like "MyClass obj(obj); " has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Processed: Re: hidden symbol `__gcov_init' is referenced by DSO

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 355621 + moreinfo Bug#355621: gcc-4.0: hidden symbol `__gcov_init' is referenced by DSO There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administr

Bug#355621: hidden symbol `__gcov_init' is referenced by DSO

tag 355621 + moreinfo thanks please could you recheck (again) with gcc-4.2/gcc-snapshot from unstable? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#433447: Segmentation fault on compilation of kernel

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 433447 + moreinfo Bug#433447: Segmentation fault on compilation of kernel There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administ

Processed: Re: -fvisibily=hidden causes link failure against libstdc++

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 423547 - patch Bug#423547: -fvisibily=hidden causes link failure against libstdc++ Tags were: patch Tags removed: patch > retitle 423547 [fixed in 4.2] -fvisibily=hidden causes link failure against > libstdc++ Bug#423547: -fvisibily=hidden causes

Processed: Re: gcc-4.1: Possibly wrong call generation

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 425527 + moreinfo Bug#425527: gcc-4.1: Possibly wrong call generation There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrato

Bug#425527: gcc-4.1: Possibly wrong call generation

tag 425527 + moreinfo thanks please recheck with gcc-4.2/gcc-snapshot from unstable. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#385066: stlport5.1_5.0.99rc2-3_i386 FTBFS with g++-4.1 from unstable

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 385066 + moreinfo Bug#385066: stlport5.1_5.0.99rc2-3_i386 FTBFS with g++-4.1 from unstable There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admini

Bug#424918: gcc-4.1 - segfaults if /proc is not mounted

tag 424918 + moreinfo thanks please recheck with gcc-4.2/gcc-snapshot Bastian Blank writes: > Package: gcc-4.1 > Version: 4.1.2-7 > Severity: important > > cc1 segfaults if /proc is not mounted and it have to compile large files > (the preprocessed source is over 800KiB, the source file 250KiB).

Processed: Re: fix for unreadable error messages in g++ when #define'ing min or max

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 343898 + wontfix Bug#343898: fix for unreadable error messages in g++ when #define'ing min or max Tags were: patch Tags added: wontfix > tag 343898 + moreinfo Bug#343898: fix for unreadable error messages in g++ when #define'ing min or max Tags wer

Processed: Re: Bug#424918: gcc-4.1 - segfaults if /proc is not mounted

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 424918 + moreinfo Bug#424918: gcc-4.1 - segfaults if /proc is not mounted There were no tags set. Bug#438504: gcc-4.1: [powerpc] ICE while compiling linux kernel : drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic79xx_core.c Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processi

Bug#433447: Segmentation fault on compilation of kernel

Missed to CC bug... So here a reply to my own mail... Am Sonntag, 16. September 2007 18:39:50 schrieben Sie: > Am Sonntag, 16. September 2007 17:14:01 schrieben Sie: > > tag 433447 + moreinfo > > thanks > > > > Martin Michlmayr writes: > > > * Patrick Winnertz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-17 > > 1

Bug#343898: fix for unreadable error messages in g++ when #define'ing min or max

tag 343898 + wontfix tag 343898 + moreinfo severity 343898 minor thanks > will you update the patch? no feedback, and afaics not forwarded upstream -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#400332: g++-4.1: inline destructor must be defined in-class

Frank B. Brokken writes: > Package: g++-4.1 > Version: 4.1.1-19 > Severity: normal > > > Dear Maintainers, > > While performing maintenance on my Bobcat library, suddenly my program > Bisonc++ FTBFS. The maintenance to Bobcat involved placing all inline member > function definitions below th

Processed: Re: Bug#429385: g++-4.1: Internal Compiler Error

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 429385 + moreinfo Bug#429385: g++-4.1: Internal Compiler Error There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debi

Bug#429385: g++-4.1: Internal Compiler Error

tag 429385 + moreinfo thanks please recheck with gcc-4.2/gcc-snapshot from unstable David Baron writes: > On Monday 18 June 2007, Falk Hueffner wrote: > > David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Package author posts: > > >> Better compile using G++-4.0. 4.1 fails with an internal compiler

Bug#433447: marked as done (Segmentation fault on compilation of kernel)

Your message dated Sun, 16 Sep 2007 19:01:49 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#433447: Segmentation fault on compilation of kernel has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Processing of gcc-snapshot_20070916-1_amd64.changes

gcc-snapshot_20070916-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-snapshot_20070916-1.dsc gcc-snapshot_20070916.orig.tar.gz gcc-snapshot_20070916-1.diff.gz gcc-snapshot_20070916-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

gcc-snapshot_20070916-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: gcc-snapshot_20070916-1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20070916-1.diff.gz gcc-snapshot_20070916-1.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20070916-1.dsc gcc-snapshot_20070916-1_amd64.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20070916-1_amd64.deb gcc-snapsh

Bug#419562: marked as done (gcc-4.1: dummy scanf needed)

Your message dated Sun, 16 Sep 2007 19:18:39 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#419562: gcc-4.1: dummy scanf needed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#419562: gcc-4.1: dummy scanf needed

Le 16.09.2007 17:50:43, Matthias Klose a écrit : > - what input data do you use? > - please recheck with gcc 4.2 4.3/gcc-snapshot You can close the bug. nicolas patrois : pts noir asocial -- RÉALISME M : Qu'est-ce qu'il nous faudrait pour qu'on nous considère comme des humains ? Un cerveau

Bug#438816: gcc-multilib: Please provide arch-gcc binary for the multilib architecture

Josh Triplett writes: > Matthias Klose wrote: > > Josh Triplett writes: > >> Package: gcc-multilib > >> Version: 4:4.1.2-3 > >> Severity: wishlist > >> > >> Could gcc-multilib provide an arch-gcc binary for the multilib > >> architecture? > >> For instance, i486-linux-gnu-gcc on x86_64? > > > > i

Processed: Re: ICE in verify_local_live_at_start, at flow.c:546

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 378107 + wontfix Bug#378107: gcc-3.4: internal compiler error: in verify_local_live_at_start, at flow.c:546 There were no tags set. Tags added: wontfix > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug track

Bug#378107: ICE in verify_local_live_at_start, at flow.c:546

tag 378107 + wontfix thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tag gcc report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 408850 + moreinfo Bug#408850: using flags "-fwhole-program --combine" broken Tags were: help Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator

Bug#429385: g++-4.1: Internal Compiler Error

On Sunday 16 September 2007, Matthias Klose wrote: > tag 429385 + moreinfo > thanks > > please recheck with gcc-4.2/gcc-snapshot from unstable > > David Baron writes: > > On Monday 18 June 2007, Falk Hueffner wrote: > > > David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Package author posts: > > > >

Bug#438436: Bug#438066: bfilter_1.1-1 (alpha/unstable): FTBFS: makelexer segfault

tags 438066 -moreinfo tags 438436 moreinfo thanks On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 04:59:29PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > tag 438066 + moreinfo > thanks > please recheck with 4.2 and 4.3/snapshot Forwarding to the right bug. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free

Processed: Re: Bug#438066: bfilter_1.1-1 (alpha/unstable): FTBFS: makelexer segfault

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 438066 -moreinfo Bug#438066: bfilter_1.1-1 (alpha/unstable): FTBFS: makelexer segfault Tags were: moreinfo Tags removed: moreinfo > tags 438436 moreinfo Bug#438436: g++-4.1 [alpha]: segfault in constructor with -Os There were no tags set. Tags add

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-4.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1 > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status report f

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.2

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.2 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #440545 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR33381 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW usertags 440545 + status-NEW t

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.1

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #436013 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11078 # * remote status changed: (?) -> ASSIGNED usertags 436013 + status-A

Bug#414099: gcc-4.1: cross build failure: debug package not built when cross compiling

Am Sun, 16. Sep 2007, 17:57:04 +0200 schrieb Matthias Klose: > please recheck if this is still the case with current 4.1 and 4.2 > sources. I don't currently have a powerpc machine up and running, so I won't be able to test the resulting compiler very much. Also, I've switched to lenny in the mea

Bug#414099: gcc-4.1: cross build failure: debug package not built when cross compiling

On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:46:49 +0200 Jö Fahlke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't currently have a powerpc machine up and running, so I won't > be able to test the resulting compiler very much. Also, I've switched > to lenny in the meantime. For building the pakage, I'm using > > * dpkg-cross 1

Results for 4.3.0 20070916 (experimental) [trunk revision 128522] (Debian 20070916-1) testsuite on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Sun Sep 16 07:54:18 UTC 2007 (revision 128522) Target: x86_64-linux-gnu gcc version 4.3.0 20070916 (experimental) [trunk revision 128522] (Debian 20070916-1) === acats tests === === acats Summary === # of expected passes2315 # of

Bug#433301: marked as done (gcc-4.1: default target of -M generated rule lacks path)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Sep 2007 04:19:55 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#433301: gcc-4.1: default target of -M generated rule lacks path has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t