Chris and Matthias,
It appears that binutils is definitely not the culprit with
gcc-3.1-3.1.1ds3-1's failure on debian ppc sid. I see the same
failure with the build of gcc-3.1-3.1.1ds3-1 on my machine with
a locally built binutils 2.12.90.0.15 installed as we do on
voltaire. However, I still am
Well it doesn't look like its binutils so far. I tried building
the current gcc-3.1-3.1.1-ds3 source package against current debian
sid and my local 2.12.90.0.15 binutils and it fails in the same
manner. I am now rebuilding my local gcc-3.1.1 package which is based
on the debian rules/patches d
It's probably binutils. Expect another upload (of 15-1) in the next
24hrs.
C
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Jack Howarth wrote:
> What happened to the gcc 3.1.1 build on debian ppc sid? It looks
> horribly broken from the log. I ask because I built locally a
> gcc 3.1.1 package using the previous pre
What happened to the gcc 3.1.1 build on debian ppc sid? It looks
horribly broken from the log. I ask because I built locally a
gcc 3.1.1 package using the previous pre3 debian packaging patches
and rules and the gcc 3.1.1 official release tarballs. It built
fine and passes all of the test suite
4 matches
Mail list logo
