It's probably binutils. Expect another upload (of 15-1) in the next 24hrs.
C On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Jack Howarth wrote: > What happened to the gcc 3.1.1 build on debian ppc sid? It looks > horribly broken from the log. I ask because I built locally a > gcc 3.1.1 package using the previous pre3 debian packaging patches > and rules and the gcc 3.1.1 official release tarballs. It built > fine and passes all of the test suite as well as Franz Sirls > redhat based builds of gcc 3.1.1 release did. I see only 2 > unexpected gcc failures here whereas voltaire gets 14. Worse I get > 1 unexpected libjava failure here and voltaire gets 697. Wow. > The only major difference I can think of is that I am using > a locally built binutils 2.12.90.0.15 instead of whats in sid. > Jack > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >
