Processed: Re: Processed: your mail

2023-05-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfixed 1016903 12.2.0-8 Bug #1016903 [g++-12] tree-vectorize: Wrong code at O2 level (-fno-tree-vectorize is working) No longer marked as fixed in versions 12.2.0-8. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need ass

Re: Processed: your mail

2014-09-30 Thread Matthias Klose
just reassigning to GCC doesn't make the ftbfs in open-axiom go away. Control: reassign -1 src:open-axiom Control: clone -1 -2 Control: reassign -2 src:gcc-4.9 Control: severity -2 important Control: forwarded -2 https://gcc.gnu.org/PR63405 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.d

Re: Processed: your mail

2003-11-19 Thread Herbert Xu
reassign 221621 kernel quit On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 07:23:04PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > > > OK. I'm happy to do this as long as you don't mind any patch > > conflicts as a result this should your architecture require > > patches later on. > > > > If you agree with that, please reassign the bu

Re: Processed: your mail

2003-11-19 Thread Ben Collins
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 10:25:21AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 06:14:30PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > > > > Just because the binaries are built somewhere else does not defer the > > fact that the bug is in the source. He's having a problem building the > > kernel-source pack

Re: Processed: your mail

2003-11-19 Thread Herbert Xu
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 06:14:30PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > > Just because the binaries are built somewhere else does not defer the > fact that the bug is in the source. He's having a problem building the > kernel-source package, and that has to be fixed there, not in > kernel-image-sparc. Even

Re: Processed: your mail

2003-11-19 Thread Ben Collins
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 09:30:11AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 05:17:16PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > > > > But this is a bug in the kernel source, not in the sparc kernel package. > > Why should it be assigned to the kernel-image-sparc package when it has > > to be fixed in

Re: Processed: your mail

2003-11-19 Thread Herbert Xu
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 05:17:16PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > > But this is a bug in the kernel source, not in the sparc kernel package. > Why should it be assigned to the kernel-image-sparc package when it has > to be fixed in the kernel-source package? The kernel-source package does not support

Re: Processed: your mail

2003-11-19 Thread Ben Collins
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 09:13:33AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: > reassign 221621 kernel-image-sparc-2.4 > quit > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 03:48:12PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > > > reassign 221621 kernel-source-2.4.22 > > Bug#221621:

Re: Processed: your mail

2003-11-19 Thread Herbert Xu
reassign 221621 kernel-image-sparc-2.4 quit On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 03:48:12PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > reassign 221621 kernel-source-2.4.22 > Bug#221621: gcc-3.3: fails to compile the linux kernel > Bug reassigned from package `g