On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 10:25:21AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 06:14:30PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > > > > Just because the binaries are built somewhere else does not defer the > > fact that the bug is in the source. He's having a problem building the > > kernel-source package, and that has to be fixed there, not in > > kernel-image-sparc. Even if I put a patch in kernel-image-sparc, it > > doesn't fix his problem. > > > > Fact, kernel-image-sparc builds from kernel-source _without_ patches. > > OK. I'm happy to do this as long as you don't mind any patch > conflicts as a result this should your architecture require > patches later on. > > If you agree with that, please reassign the bug back to the 'kernel' > package.
I have no problem with that. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/
