On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 10:27:27PM +, David Goodenough wrote:
>
> Possibly, but it would appear that it does not honour the old directives,
> at least the code that is generated is different. I generated kernels
> with the warnings and with a fixed Makefile and the generated kernels
> are of
On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 09:40:22AM +1100, herbert wrote:
>
> That's a bug in gcc-3.2. In fact it seems that it doesn't respect
> -falign-jumps at all:
>
> gcc-3.2 -falign-labels=0 -falign-jumps=0 -S -O2 a.c
To add insult to injury, -malign-jumps=0 actually works with gcc-3.2!
--
Debian GNU/Lin
2 matches
Mail list logo