On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 10:27:27PM +0000, David Goodenough wrote:
>
> Possibly, but it would appear that it does not honour the old directives,
> at least the code that is generated is different. I generated kernels
> with the warnings and with a fixed Makefile and the generated kernels
> are of different size.
That's a bug in gcc-3.2. In fact it seems that it doesn't respect
-falign-jumps at all:
gcc-3.2 -falign-labels=0 -falign-jumps=0 -S -O2 a.c
*****
int m();
int n();
int k(int l) {
if (l == 3) {
m();
n();
m();
m();
n();
} else {
n();
n();
n();
m();
m();
}
return 3;
}
*****
.file "b.c"
.text
.align 2
.p2align 2,,3
.globl k
.type k,@function
k:
pushl %ebp
movl %esp, %ebp
subl $8, %esp
cmpl $3, 8(%ebp)
je .L4
call n
call n
call n
call m
call m
.L3:
movl $3, %eax
leave
ret
.p2align 2,,3
.L4:
call m
call n
call m
call m
call n
jmp .L3
.Lfe1:
.size k,.Lfe1-k
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 3.2.1 20020924 (Debian prerelease)"
*****
Anyway, I'm closing this bug because the 2.4 kernels must still work
with gcc 2.95 which does not support -falign.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
