--- Additional Comments From charlet at act-europe dot fr 2004-01-26 08:14
---
Subject: Re: [3.4/3.5 regression] [ia64] ICE in push_secondary_reload
> However, it is my understanding that breaks that affect only Ada are
> *not* considered critical, and in fact that there
--- Additional Comments From charlet at act-europe dot fr 2004-01-22 15:42
---
Subject: Re: [3.4/3.5 Regression] xnmake gets miscompiled during bootstrap
with ada enabled
> I'm getting this build error on a Linux build using gcc 3.3.2 on RH9 - is this
> the same problem
--- Additional Comments From charlet at act-europe dot fr 2004-01-19 22:30
---
Subject: Re: [3.4/3.5 Regression] xnmake gets miscompiled during bootstrap
with ada enabled
> According to the changelog, these are:
>
> 2003-12-08 Arnaud Charlet <[EMA
--- Additional Comments From charlet at act-europe dot fr 2004-01-12 11:08
---
Subject: Re: would be nice if gnatmake passed -fprofile-arcs to gnatlink
> Besides which, it's a regression.
In the strict sense, yes.
But the regression comes from the fact that -fprofile-arc
--- Additional Comments From charlet at act-europe dot fr 2004-01-12 10:59
---
Subject: Re: would be nice if gnatmake passed -fprofile-arcs to gnatlink
> If I pass valid arguments and valid code to gnatmake, and it fails to create
> working code, how is that not a bug?
The
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10110
--- Additional Comments From charlet at act-europe dot fr 2003-10-21 16:18
---
Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4 regression] [mipsel-linux]ada bootstrap error
> The other er
6 matches
Mail list logo
