------- Additional Comments From charlet at act-europe dot fr 2004-01-26 08:14 ------- Subject: Re: [3.4/3.5 regression] [ia64] ICE in push_secondary_reload
> However, it is my understanding that breaks that affect only Ada are > *not* considered critical, and in fact that there is no obligation for > anyone to attempt to build the Ada front end. I normally do not > bother building it even on platforms that can handle it (ia64-hpux > cannot, as the runtime has not been ported). This is why I did not Even if the run time has not been tailored for ia64-hpux, you can still build the generic part, which is more than enough for doing a bootstrap. > respond very fast to this bug report. I am willing to change my > habits if the policy has changed, but not otherwise. As shown by most of the Ada regressions recently, most of these regressions actually show real bugs in the non Ada part of GCC, so I believe this is in the interest of everyone to take Ada reports into consideration. I believe the policy you are stating was fine as long as Ada was not properly maintained, which is no longer the case. I'd suggest reconsidering the state of Ada, given the efforts invested recently on this front-end (as shown by the regular syncs and by the handling of Ada PRs in bugzilla). Arno -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13722 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
