Bug#205548: gcc-3.3: linking fails for large shared libaries

On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 09:44:55AM +1000, Jim Watson wrote: > On Sat, 16 Aug 2003 03:59, Matthias Klose wrote: > > ld is not stripped, so you could get a stacktrace. > > sorry but i will need someone to tell me how to do this. > I can change the makefiles and I know how i can copy this command li

g++ Omtermal compiler error in merge_blocks_move_predecessor_nojumps, at cfgcleanup.c:650

>Category: c++ >Synopsis: g++ Omtermal compiler error in >merge_blocks_move_predecessor_nojumps, at cfgcleanup.c:650 >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: net >Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Release:g++

std include path for gcc 3.2.1

Hi, during the discussion about patches for stlport to make sure that it uses the correct include path, this was noted: From: "Kevin B. Hendricks" Subject: Re: [dev] stlport compiler differences To: dev@openoffice.org, Ken Foskey > > The patch for gcc 3.2.1 might include the minor versi

Re: experimental gcc-3.2 packages

On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 08:38:07PM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote: > > So, should this change be considered to be a bug fix in g++ 3.2, and > > anything which breaks because of it should be fixed, or is it a > > problem with g++ 3.2? > > It's clearly a bug fix. Thanks Martin for your help with thi

Re: experimental gcc-3.2 packages

On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 09:58:57PM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote: > Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I have posted the test script and preprocessed source here: > > http://apt-proxy.sourceforge.net/ooo/g++test > > http://apt-proxy.sourceforge.net/o

Re: experimental gcc-3.2 packages

On Sat, Aug 03, 2002 at 08:07:03PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > http://ftp-master-debian.org/~doko/gcc I've tracked down the problem I've been having compiling OpenOffice.org on i386 and g++-3.2 to a difference between output of different compiler versions. The build process complains tha