On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 08:38:07PM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote: > > So, should this change be considered to be a bug fix in g++ 3.2, and > > anything which breaks because of it should be fixed, or is it a > > problem with g++ 3.2? > > It's clearly a bug fix.
Thanks Martin for your help with this. I've investigated further and discovered that the class which was causing the problem was linked in already, but from a library that had been compiled with -fno-rtti. I changed the options for that library to include RTTI, and now the compilation succeeds and OpenOffice continues to build. Just another 6 hours to go now ;) Thanks a lot, Chris
pgpazUtUjgza2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
