On dim., 2012-05-27 at 00:52 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 23:51 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > Svante,
> >
> > am Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:58:10PM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> > > On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 19:39 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > > On Sun, May 13, 2012
On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 23:51 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Svante,
>
> am Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:58:10PM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> > On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 19:39 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 19:56:15 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > > sorry, thinko. I did
Svante,
am Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:58:10PM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 19:39 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 19:56:15 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > sorry, thinko. I did mean End of May.
> > So we're at the end of May. Can we have that
Svante Signell writes:
> On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 19:39 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 19:56:15 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> sorry, thinko. I did mean End of May.
>> So we're at the end of May. Can we have that revert now, or do I need
>> to NMU?
> Stop nagging about
On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 19:39 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 19:56:15 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> > sorry, thinko. I did mean End of May.
> >
> So we're at the end of May. Can we have that revert now, or do I need
> to NMU?
Stop nagging about the default gcc compiler
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 19:56:15 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> sorry, thinko. I did mean End of May.
>
So we're at the end of May. Can we have that revert now, or do I need
to NMU?
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
6 matches
Mail list logo
