On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 23:51 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > Svante, > > am Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:58:10PM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben: > > On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 19:39 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 19:56:15 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > > sorry, thinko. I did mean End of May. > > > So we're at the end of May. Can we have that revert now, or do I need > > > to NMU? > > Stop nagging about the default gcc compiler for wheezy. Right now it is > > gcc-4.7, and problems will be resolved in due time for the release. > > sorry to annoy you but nagging about problems of the upcoming release is > actually our job description. So no, we won't stop just because you're > telling > us to, just with solid reasons instead of handwaving about it all going away > because you say so. It's a hell lot of work it's causing. Nobody's saying > anything against having gcc-4.7 as an option.
Philipp, With all due respect, So far I have not seen any bug report causing the gcc-4.7 as default compiler being serious enough to make it reverted. Name the problematic bugs then, please. And, where is the big problem, please explain? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1338072725.3547.10.camel@x60
