Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: Debian GCC Maintainers
Please downgrade the priority of gcc-4.3-base to optional, now that
libgcc is built from the gcc-4.4 sources.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
--- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-09 19:07
---
Oops, sorry, I stand corrected, needed some sleep... indeed, that reminds me...
other/42230 !! ;)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42670
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 18:43 ---
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00446.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #3 from ian at airs dot com 2010-01-09 18:16 ---
c++filt is part of the binutils, but it just runs the demangler which is part
of gcc. Any change here will be a change to the demangler.
--
ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Add
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_4_2_release revision 152840
Target: sparc-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.4.3 20100108 (prerelease) (Debian 4.4.2-9)
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/abi/guard2.C scan-assemble
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_4_2_release revision 152840
Target: s390-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.4.3 20100108 (prerelease) (Debian 4.4.2-9)
Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
=== g++ Summary for unix ===
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_4_2_release revision 152840
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.4.3 20100108 (prerelease) (Debian 4.4.2-9)
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
=== g++ Summary for unix
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_4_2_release revision 152840
Target: i486-kfreebsd-gnu
gcc version 4.4.3 20100108 (prerelease) (Debian 4.4.2-9)
Native configuration is i486-pc-kfreebsd-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
=== g++ Summary for uni
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_4_2_release revision 152840
Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libgomp tests ===
Running target unix
=== libgomp Summary ===
# of expected passes2424
=== libstdc++ tests ==
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 16:23 ---
libiberty/testsuite/demangle-expected has
---
--format=gnu-v3 --no-params
_GLOBAL__I__Z2fnv
global constructors keyed to _Z2fnv
global constructors keyed to _Z2fnv
---
Shouldn't it be
global constructors keyed to
If I replace :
--Sin.Sin_Family := (Has_Sockaddr_Len => True,
-- Length => Sin'Size / 8,
-- Char_Family => System.OS_Constants.AF_INET);
by
Thin_Common.Set_Family (Sin.Sin_Family, Family_Inet);
The new (bind_socket.adb + patch) code fail again.
A look to Set_Family show that since Has_Sockaddr_
original message-
De: "Jan-Benedict Glaw" jbg...@lug-owl.de
A: "Xavier Grave" gr...@ipno.in2p3.fr, 564...@bugs.debian.org
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 15:36:09 +0100
-
> Did you test errno? Please try this:
Yes and I ge
On Sat, 2010-01-09 14:37:58 +0100, Xavier Grave wrote:
> >> sin.sin_port = 5786;
>
> > `errno' should contain more detailed information about why it failed.
> > Also, keep in mind that "sin.sin_port = 5786" is probably not what you
> > want, think of network byte order! Sparc and PPC are big endi
original message-
De: "Jan-Benedict Glaw" jbg...@lug-owl.de
A: "Xavier Grave" gr...@ipno.in2p3.fr, 564...@bugs.debian.org
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 11:24:15 +0100
-
>>
>> sin.sin_port = 5786;
> `errno' should contai
original message-
De: "Jan-Benedict Glaw" jbg...@lug-owl.de
A: "Xavier Grave" gr...@ipno.in2p3.fr, 564...@bugs.debian.org
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 11:24:15 +0100
-
> On Sat, 2010-01-09 02:50:23 +0100, Xavier Grave
On Sat, 2010-01-09 02:50:23 +0100, Xavier Grave wrote:
> The following C code give different results on kfreebsd amd64 on one side
> and sparc/powerpc/ on the other side
> for kfreebsd amd64 :
> xav...@debian:~$ ./bind_socket_c
> sin len 16
> res -1
> and
> for sparc :
> ./xav...@canis-latrans:~$
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-09 10:19
---
c++filt is part of binutils and indeed the PR is about binutils, thus doesn't
belong here. If you have strong reasons to believe GCC is at fault, please
explain and reopen.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle do
17 matches
Mail list logo