----------------original message----------------- De: "Jan-Benedict Glaw" jbg...@lug-owl.de A: "Xavier Grave" gr...@ipno.in2p3.fr, 564...@bugs.debian.org Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 11:24:15 +0100 ------------------------------------------------- > On Sat, 2010-01-09 02:50:23 +0100, Xavier Grave gr...@ipno.in2p3.fr > wrote: >> The following C code give different results on kfreebsd amd64 on one side >> and sparc/powerpc/ on the other side >> for kfreebsd amd64 : >> xav...@debian:~$ ./bind_socket_c >> sin len 16 >> res -1 >> and >> for sparc : >> ./xav...@canis-latrans:~$ ./bind_socket_c >> sin len 16 >> res 0 >> for powerpc : >> xav...@power5:~$ ./bind_socket_c >> sin len 16 >> res 0 >> code used :
>> problem doesn't seem any more specific to Ada ? > > `errno' should contain more detailed information about why it failed. > Also, keep in mind that "sin.sin_port = 5786" is probably not what you > want, think of network byte order! Sparc and PPC are big endian and I > guess that amd64 is little endian. I have tested the same code (both Ada and c) on Debian GNU/Linux i386 and results are similar to sparc and powerpc But I will try with the good network bytes order on FreeBSD, thanks for the tip xavier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
