Re: Processed: Re: Bug#295457: gcc-snapshot: FTBFS on amd64: /usr/include/pthread.h:655: error: array type has incomplete element type

tags 295457 fixed-upstream thanks > /usr/include/pthread.h line 654-655 say: > struct __jmp_buf_tag; > extern int __sigsetjmp (struct __jmp_buf_tag __env[1], int __savemask) > __THROW; Note that in 2.3.4 it's changed as follows: /* Function used in the macros. */ struct __jmp_buf_tag; extern i

Bug#302033: dpkg-architecture: Specified GNU system type i386-linux does not match gcc system type i486-linux-gnu

On Sun, 2005-04-03 at 15:29 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Kamaraju Kusumanchi writes: > > Package: gcc-snapshot > > Version: 20050319-1 > > Severity: normal > > > > > > While building mpich2 from sources using gcc-snapshot, I am getting the > > following warnings. > > > > dpkg-architecture: wa

Bug#302989: optimizer breaks function inlining

Package: g++-4.0 Version: 4.0-0pre5 Severity: normal Hi, The following test code (atof.cc) elicits no warning when compiled with g++-4.0 -c -Wall atof.cc but with optimization GCC complains about the standard library function atof(): [EMAIL PROTECTED] -c -Wall -O atof.cc atof.cc: In memb

Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#297059: libgcj5-awt: java.awt.IllegalComponentStateException with konqueror java applet viewer

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 08:48:06AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > reassign 297059 libgcj5-awt Bug#297059: libgcj5-awt: java.awt.IllegalComponentStateException with konqueror java applet vi

Bug#302033: dpkg-architecture: Specified GNU system type i386-linux does not match gcc system type i486-linux-gnu

Actually, while submitting the bug report I was not very sure if the bug is in gcc-snapshot or some other package. So, I asked in the debian-user mailing list the exact question. Brian Nelson replied to it saying that the problem could be with gcc-snapshot. The corresponding thread could be found a

Re: Processed: Re: Bug#297059: libgcj5-awt: java.awt.IllegalComponentStateException with konqueror java applet viewer

On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 08:48:06AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: reassign 297059 libgcj5-awt thanks This bug has nothing to do with gcjwebplugin. Konqueror has its own applet framework. The bug is clearly a GCJ bug. Michael -- Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath! http://www.gnu.

Bug#296001: marked as done (gcc-4.0: New snapshot (wish))

Your message dated Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:43:55 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#296001: gcc-4.0: New snapshot (wish) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Re: Bug#295457: gcc-snapshot: FTBFS on amd64: /usr/include/pthread.h:655: error: array type has incomplete element type

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 295457 glibc Bug#295457: gcc-snapshot: FTBFS on amd64: /usr/include/pthread.h:655: error: array type has incomplete element type Bug reassigned from package `gcc-snapshot' to `glibc'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if y

Processed: Re: Bug#297059: libgcj5-awt: java.awt.IllegalComponentStateException with konqueror java applet viewer

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 297059 gcjwebplugin Bug#297059: libgcj5-awt: java.awt.IllegalComponentStateException with konqueror java applet viewer Bug reassigned from package `libgcj5-awt' to `gcjwebplugin'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you n

Bug#297574: marked as done (gcj-4.0: ICE in compiling jar file with -O2: in remove_unreachable_regions, at except.c:694)

Your message dated Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:10:02 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#297574: confirmed: gcc-snapshot 20050227 do not ICE has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#298508: [arm] gcc-3.3 and 3.4 cannot compile glibc 2.3.4

Please recheck with gcc-4.0. GOTO Masanori writes: > Package: gcc-3.3 > Version: 1:3.3.5-8 > Severity: normal > > Debian gcc-3.3 and gcc-3.4 (Version: 3.4.3-9) on arm cannot compile > the following code derived from glibc 2.3.4 with -O option: > > double > __fmax (double x, double y)

Bug#301401: marked as done (libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1: packaged is needed for Sun JDK 1.3)

Your message dated Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:31:43 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#301401: libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1: packaged is needed for Sun JDK 1.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#301746: gcc-3.4: Redundant reloading from stack frame

please can you recheck with the gcc-4.0 package from experimental? [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Package: gcc-3.4 > Version: 3.4.3-6 > Severity: wishlist > > This is a regression from gcc-3.2 in that gcc-3.2 does not have this > problem bug gcc-3.3 does. > > The attached program generates the foll

Re: serious (5x) link-time regression in 3.3.5-12 on ia64

according to the changelog, nothing really has changed ... CCing to the ia64 list. Duraid Madina writes: > Hi Mathias, Gerhard and others, > > I want to report a nasty performance regression in 3.3.5-12. Moving > from: > > gcc version 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-11) > > to: > > gcc version 3.3

Bug#302033: dpkg-architecture: Specified GNU system type i386-linux does not match gcc system type i486-linux-gnu

why do you think this a bug in gcc-snapshot? dpkg-architecture flags this as a warning. shouldn't it be dpkg's responsibility to map between i386-linux and i486-linux-gnu. The gcc system type does not have to match the gnu system type. Kamaraju Kusumanchi writes: > Package: gcc-snapshot > Version: