please can you recheck with the gcc-4.0 package from experimental?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Package: gcc-3.4
> Version: 3.4.3-6
> Severity: wishlist
>
> This is a regression from gcc-3.2 in that gcc-3.2 does not have this
> problem bug gcc-3.3 does.
>
> The attached program generates the following code on i386 with
> gcc -S -O2:
>
> ...
>
> .L2:
> movl -16(%ebp), %eax
> xorl %esi, %esi
> testl %eax, %eax
> je .L8
>
> As you can see %eax now contains the value in -16(%ebp).
>
> subl $12, %esp
> movl -16(%ebp), %eax
>
> gcc-3.4 decides to reload for no reason at all.
>
> pushl %eax
> call strlen
> movl %eax, %esi
> addl $16, %esp
> .L5:
> pushl %eax
> pushl %edi
> pushl %ebx
> leal 2(%edi,%esi), %eax
> pushl %eax
> call malloc
> movl %eax, (%esp)
> movl %eax, %ebx
> call mempcpy
> movl -16(%ebp), %edi
>
> Again the value of -16(%ebp) is in %edi.
>
> addl $16, %esp
> testl %edi, %edi
> je .L6
> movb $61, (%eax)
> pushl %ecx
> pushl %esi
> movl -16(%ebp), %edx
>
> gcc-3.4 decides to reload it yet again.
>
> pushl %edx
> incl %eax
> pushl %eax
> call mempcpy
> addl $16, %esp
>
> ...
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- System Information
> Debian Release: 3.1
> Kernel Version: Linux gondolin 2.4.27-hx-1-686-smp #3 SMP Tue Oct 5 20:01:26
> EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
>
> Versions of the packages gcc-3.4 depends on:
> ii binutils 2.15-5 The GNU assembler, linker and binary utiliti
> ii cpp-3.4 3.4.3-6 The GNU C preprocessor
> ii gcc-3.4-base 3.4.3-6 The GNU Compiler Collection (base package)
> ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
> ii libgcc1 3.4.3-6 GCC support library
> --
> typedef unsigned int size_t;
> extern size_t strlen (__const char *__s) __attribute__ ((__pure__));
> extern char *strchrnul (__const char *__s, int __c) __attribute__
> ((__pure__));
> extern void *mempcpy (void *__restrict __dest,
> __const void *__restrict __src, size_t __n) ;
> extern void *malloc(size_t);
>
> extern void setvareq(char *s, int flags);
> extern char *endofname(const char *);
> extern void sh_error(const char *, ...) __attribute__ ((__noreturn__));
>
> void
> setvar(const char *name, const char *val, int flags)
> {
> char *p, *q;
> size_t namelen;
> char *nameeq;
> size_t vallen;
>
> q = endofname(name);
> p = strchrnul(q, '=');
> namelen = p - name;
> if (!namelen || p != q)
> sh_error("%.*s: bad variable name", namelen, name);
> vallen = 0;
> if (val == ((void *)0)) {
> flags |= 2;
> } else {
> vallen = strlen(val);
> }
> p = mempcpy(nameeq = malloc(namelen + vallen + 2), name, namelen);
> if (val) {
> *p++ = '=';
> p = mempcpy(p, val, vallen);
> }
> *p = '\0';
> setvareq(nameeq, flags | 1);
> }
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
