--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-06 04:18
---
I believe it to be fixed. Reopen if not.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg00323.html
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-06
04:11 ---
Subject: Bug 10692
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-3_4-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-06 04:10:59
Modified files:
gcc: Change
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-06
04:09 ---
Subject: Bug 10692
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-06 04:09:12
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog reload1.c
Log message:
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |rtl-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10692
--- You are receiving this mail becaus
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW
falk, hi,
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 03:30:25PM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can you still reproduce this problem with the current gcc-4.0 package?
> If so, please provide the preprocessed source file.
shriek - that's with --enable-final so is the contents of every single
file in the di
Package: libstdc++5
Version: 1:3.3.4-13
Severity: grave
Tags: sarge
I upgraded a sarge hppa box to the latest bits, which brought in
libstdc++ 3.3.5-5. apt & aptitude began segfaulting:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Done
Segmentation faulty Tree... 0%
[EMAIL
Manuel Bilderbeek wrote:
> Package: gcc-3.3
> Version: 1:3.3.5-5
> Severity: important
>
>
> When compiling the included program with the mentioned versions of gcc,
> wrong code is generated when using -O1 or -O2. See the comments in the
> program, which I saved as test.c:
>
> --
Well this means that all debian 3.0 packages which have been compiled w/
gcc 2.95 might contain serious integer overflow problems regardless one
thinks he does secure programming.
marco
Falk Hueffner wrote:
Marco Fabbricatore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 05.01.05
14:08:32:
Hi,
can you still reproduce this problem with the current gcc-4.0 package?
If so, please provide the preprocessed source file.
Falk
Marco Fabbricatore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 05.01.05
14:08:32:
> Package: gcc
> Version: 2.95.4 20011002
>
> following function compiled w/ gcc -O
>
> int foo(unsigned int a)
> {
> if(a * sizeof(int) / sizeof(int) != a)
>return -1;
> return 0;
> }
>
> g
Package: gcc
Version: 2.95.4 20011002
following function compiled w/ gcc -O
int foo(unsigned int a)
{
if(a * sizeof(int) / sizeof(int) != a)
return -1;
return 0;
}
results in:
:
0: 55 push %ebp
1: 89 e5 mov%esp,%ebp
3:
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.5-5
Severity: important
When compiling the included program with the mentioned versions of gcc,
wrong code is generated when using -O1 or -O2. See the comments in the
program, which I saved as test.c:
-- CUT HERE ---
/* Thi
-Original message-
Van: Matthias Klose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: woensdag 5 januari 2005 1:43
Aan: Michiel Vugteveen; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Re: Bug#288670: bug libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-5
Michiel Vugteveen writes:
> Package: libstdc++5
> Version: 1:3.3.5-5
> Distribution: TESTI
Your message dated Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:08:33 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#287011: 1:3.3.5-5 segfaults compiling Firefox
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
15 matches
Mail list logo
