Your message dated Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:08:33 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#287011: 1:3.3.5-5 segfaults compiling Firefox
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Dec 2004 16:52:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 23 08:52:27 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (tu201235.tsinghua.edu.cn) [202.38.103.50]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ChWCR-0003HW-00; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 08:52:27 -0800
Received: from bear by tu201235.tsinghua.edu.cn with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1ChWS0-0008M0-1j; Fri, 24 Dec 2004 01:08:32 +0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: bear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: always segfault after upgrading
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.5
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 01:08:31 +0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.5-5
Severity: normal
I am building CVS version of ITK. It is a large medical image processing
project written with C++. I have no problem building it using the previous
version of gcc(3.3.5-4). But with 3.3.5-5 the building process often pauses
with
internal compiler error: Segmentation
fault
But I still can go on building when remaking after remaking
I have the same problem when using Gentoo Linux long before
which I remember it is caused by overscaling the frequency
of Atholon XP. But this time I don't.
What is the problem?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages gcc-3.3 depends on:
ii binutils 2.15-5 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii cpp-3.3 1:3.3.5-5 The GNU C preprocessor
ii gcc-3.3-base 1:3.3.5-5 The GNU Compiler Collection (base
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-19 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-6 GCC support library
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 287011-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jan 2005 08:09:06 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 05 00:09:06 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fmmailgate05.web.de [217.72.192.243]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cm6E5-0006gs-00; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 00:09:06 -0800
Received: by fmmailgate05.web.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/webde Linux 0.7) with SMTP id
j0587DKg006923
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:08:34 +0100
Received: from [80.144.176.38] by freemailng5704.web.de with HTTP;
Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:08:33 +0100
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:08:33 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Falk Hueffner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#287011: 1:3.3.5-5 segfaults compiling Firefox
Precedence: fm-user
X-WEBDE-Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: http://freemail.web.de/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
TB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 04.01.05 23:10:59:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 04:28:37PM -0500, TB wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:15:46PM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> > > It is very likely that this is actually a hardware problem. Gcc bugs
> > > tend to be 100% deterministic and repeatable (actually, I cannot
> > > think of any that wasn't, and I've seen quite a few).
> >
> > You may be right. I OC my machine and recently changed the bios.
> > I think it's a touch more aggressive than it was before when it was
> > stable.
>
> You're right.
Okay, let's close this, then.
Falk
