Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:34:58 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#224340: gcc-snapshot: ICE in cxx_incomplete_type_diagnostic
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:13:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#224608: gcc-3.0: Wrong build requirements
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 227518 [fixed in 3.4] g++-3.3: Doesn't find inherited inner class
> after template instantiation
Bug#227518: g++-3.3: Doesn't find inherited inner class after template
instantiation
Changed Bug title.
> tags 227518 + upstream
Bug#227518: [fix
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 226727 ICE when building qscintilla and cal3d on mips
Bug#226727: ICE when building qscintilla, cal3d and abiword on mips
Changed Bug title.
> severity 226727 important
Bug#226727: ICE when building qscintilla and cal3d on mips
Severity set to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 224413 [PR 13621] [3.3 regression, fixed in 3.4] cc1plus crashes when
> compiling a statement expression returning type string
Bug#224413: [PR 13621] [3.3 regression] cc1plus crashes when compiling a
statement expression returning type string
Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:24:10 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#223391: gcc-3.2: Anonymous namespaces can sometimes still
cause cross-object symbol conflicts
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 128993 + fixed-upstream
Bug#128993: [PR libstdc++/9073] Can __STL_ASSERTIONS come back, but with more
than rope?
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: fixed-upstream
> retitle 128993 [PR9073, fixed in 3.4] Can __STL_ASSERTIONS come back, but
> with mo
retitle 227518 [fixed in 3.4] g++-3.3: Doesn't find inherited inner class after
template instantiation
tags 227518 + upstream
tags 227518 + fixed-upstream
thanks
Alexander Motzkau writes:
> Package: g++-3.3
> Version: 1:3.3.2-4
> Severity: normal
>
> Compiling the following file using
>
> g
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:33:16 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#207516: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3.3ds2-0pre2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
retitle 226727 ICE when building qscintilla and cal3d on mips
severity 226727 important
thanks
severity important, because there is likely a workaround in building
with reduced optimization or using g++-3.2.
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7618
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
Y
--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2004-01-13 19:23 ---
I posted a sample patch for the MIPS backend here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-01/msg01199.html
This needs to be checked by someone with access to real hardware.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.
Accepted:
cpp-3.3_3.3.3-0pre2_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3_3.3.3-0pre2_hppa.deb
fastjar_3.3.3-0pre2_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fastjar_3.3.3-0pre2_hppa.deb
fixincludes_3.3.3-0pre2_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fixincludes_3.3.3-0pre2_hppa.deb
g++-3.3_3.3.3-0pre2_hppa.deb
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.
Package: g++-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.2-4
Severity: normal
Compiling the following file using
g++ -Wall -c test.cc
gives the following errors:
test.cc: In member function `void D::fun()':
test.cc:32: error: parse error before `;' token
# 1 "test.cc"
# 1 ""
# 1 ""
# 1 "test.cc"
template
class A
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at wasabisystems dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7618
--- You are receiving this
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|preprocessor|c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9071
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The attached Alpha GCC IEEE patch (which is even smaller, and possibly
clearner, than the original *grin*):
1) Removes -mno-ieee.
2) Causes the compiler to turn on -mieee if -ffinite-math-only has not been
specified.
3) Updates the documentation
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2004-01-11 22:30 ---
The differing line corresponds to this insn:
(insn 368 367 369 18 (set (reg:SI 280)
(plus:SI (mult:SI (reg:SI 278)
(const_int 4 [0x4]))
(reg:SI 278))) 359 {*m68k.md:6699} (ins
Your message dated Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:04:57 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line status of #224200 ?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
20 matches
Mail list logo