Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:13:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#224608: gcc-3.0: Wrong build requirements
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Dec 2003 16:25:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 20 10:25:06 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from slo-tech.com [212.93.228.2]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AXhOc-0006j1-00; Sat, 20 Dec 2003 07:43:54 -0600
Received: by slo-tech.com (Postar, from userid 0)
id AF8CBC2DE0; Sat, 20 Dec 2003 14:14:28 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 14:14:28 +0100
From: Primoz Bratanic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gcc-3.0: Wrong build requirements
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
X-Spam-Level:
--r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: gcc-3.0
Version: 1:3.0.4-7
Severity: normal
Current source package of gcc-3.0 (woody) does not build. It requires "dot"
contained
in non-free graphviz, but does not specify that.
--r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE/5Es0HOuqnSwJthERAlGCAKCHJemMRs78ba5i601dIeFOTo9zlQCggysC
UCqCX5399I0p0MMJiLsCtJI=
=J0uX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 224608-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 21:56:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 15:56:30 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgU2U-0003EF-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:17:22 -0600
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA18719;
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:13:13 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id i0DJDDPu014571;
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:13:13 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:13:13 +0100
To: Primoz Bratanic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#224608: gcc-3.0: Wrong build requirements
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level:
Primoz Bratanic writes:
> Package: gcc-3.0
> Version: 1:3.0.4-7
> Severity: normal
>
> Current source package of gcc-3.0 (woody) does not build. It requires "dot"
> contained
> in non-free graphviz, but does not specify that.
in testing/unstable, the docs aren't built anymore from the source, so
closing this report. However note that gcc-3.0 doesn't build on
glibc-2.3 based systems (see #212085).
