Christian Neumair writes:
> On Sa, 2004-01-10 at 12:55 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Christian Neumair writes:
> > > On Fr, 2004-01-09 at 23:21 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > > tags 226459 + moreinfo
> > > > thanks
> > > >
> > > > Christian Neumair writes:
> > > > > Package: gcc-3.2
> > > >
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-01-13 00:12
---
Subject: Re: toplev.c:4563-4567: gettext interprets
the two conditional strings as one
"jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This text goes both in the assembler file (with -fverb
--- Additional Comments From jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk 2004-01-12
23:52 ---
Subject: Re: toplev.c:4563-4567: gettext interprets
the two conditional strings as one
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, zack at codesourcery dot com wrote:
> It does no harm to translate this text, and this code is
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-01-12 23:46
---
Subject: Re: toplev.c:4563-4567: gettext interprets
the two conditional strings as one
It does no harm to translate this text, and this code is such a tangle
that I think it worthwhile to clean it up a bit
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2004-01-11 21:52 ---
The miscompilation happens here:
yearday %= (4*365 +1);
With -fregmove, this is generated:
move.l %d3,%d1 | yearday, tmp264
muls.l #376287347,%d0:%d1 |, tmp262, tmp264
asr
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-12
23:15 ---
Two things, this really does not need to lociazed at all:
fnotice (file,
#ifdef __GNUC__
"%s%s%s version %s (%s)\n%s\tcompiled by GNU C version %s.\n"
#else
"%s%s%s version %s (%s) co
retitle 227129 [fixed in 3.4] some strings are not translateable
tags 227129 + upstream
tags 227129 + fixed-upstream
thanks
Roland Illig writes:
> Package: gcc-3.3
> Version: 1:3.3.3-0pre0
> Severity: normal
>
> Some strings in the package gcc-3.3 are not translateable but should be,
> for exampl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 227129 [fixed in 3.4] some strings are not translateable
Bug#227129: gcc-3.3: some strings are not translateable
Changed Bug title.
> tags 227129 + upstream
Bug#227129: [fixed in 3.4] some strings are not translateable
There were no tags set.
T
tags 226459 + moreinfo
thanks
Christian Neumair writes:
> Package: gcc-3.2
> Version: 3.2.3-9
> Severity: minor
> Tags: sid
>
> the whole file can be found under:
> http://makeashorterlink.com/?S40724BF6
>
> Do you need any additional information?
yes, please send the preprocessed source.
Than
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 11:07:18PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 09:58:32PM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > > It turns out that this problem seems to be due to compiler
> > > incompatibility. UML had been built with gcc 2.95 due to old breakage,
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-01-12 17:05
---
This is silly. Richard is the maintainer of this target. He should have
the right to set the severity of this PR.
W.
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-12
16:18 ---
It is not critical because there is workaround.
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|cr
--- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-12
16:11 ---
This _is_ a critical bug if you are trying to bootstrap on ARM LINUX.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-12
14:18 ---
Fixed now for 3.3.3.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|
--- Additional Comments From charlet at act-europe dot fr 2004-01-12 11:08
---
Subject: Re: would be nice if gnatmake passed -fprofile-arcs to gnatlink
> Besides which, it's a regression.
In the strict sense, yes.
But the regression comes from the fact that -fprofile-arcs wasn't need
--- Additional Comments From shalesller at writeme dot com 2004-01-12
11:02 ---
Besides which, it's a regression.
~/Code/Dragon_Chess/Bug/bug-226244 $ gnatmake -fprofile-arcs drgnchss.adb
gcc-3.3 -c -fprofile-arcs drgnchss.adb
gcc-3.3 -c -fprofile-arcs board_types.ads
gcc-3.3 -c -fprof
--- Additional Comments From charlet at act-europe dot fr 2004-01-12 10:59
---
Subject: Re: would be nice if gnatmake passed -fprofile-arcs to gnatlink
> If I pass valid arguments and valid code to gnatmake, and it fails to create
> working code, how is that not a bug?
The above gener
--- Additional Comments From shalesller at writeme dot com 2004-01-12
10:55 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> gnatmake not passing -fprofile-arcs is actually not a bug, but a
> desirable enhancement.
If I pass valid arguments and valid code to gnatmake, and it fails to create
working code,
> The cross compilation patches were once submitted by Bastian Blank,
> but I never got feedback after I integrated them, so expect more
> failures ...
Well, after some playing I was able to build cross-arm gcc, g++ and
libraries from gcc-3.3 source package.
I also tried to integrate it more-or
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-12
09:03 ---
Subject: Bug 12441
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-3_3-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-12 09:02:56
Modified files:
gcc/config/i386: i386.c
20 matches
Mail list logo
