Re: GCC 3.2 standard?

2002-12-04 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Matthias Klose wrote: >we need to make g++-3.2 the standard C++ compiler at the same time, or >else we get problems linking binaries with g++, where some C modules >are built with gcc-3.2. We are currently working on a transition plan. Hmm. Care to share what that transition plan looks like so fa

Re: java.lang.reflect.Proxy missing from libgcj3

2002-12-04 Thread Matthias Klose
VEROK Istvan writes: > > The GCJ webpage boasts that java.lang.reflect.Proxy support was ported > from GNU Classpath on September 29, and it's in their CVS, but it's not in > any of the libgcj Debian packages. Is there any special reason for this? this was added to the main branch, which will be

Bug#171689: marked as done (libstdc++3 depends on gcc-3)

2002-12-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 5 Dec 2002 00:04:54 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#171689: libstdc++3 depends on gcc-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#171699: gcc-3.2: please include the stack-protector patch

2002-12-04 Thread Matthias Klose
tags 171699 + wontfix thanks Martin v. =?iso-8859-15?q?L=F6wis?= writes: > Martin Wuertele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Please include the stack-protector patch from > > http://www.trl.ibm.com/projects/security/ssp/gcc3_2/protector-3.2-5.tar.gz > > This wish is unlikely to be implemented. I

Processed: Re: Bug#171699: gcc-3.2: please include the stack-protector patch

2002-12-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 171699 + wontfix Bug#171699: gcc-3.2: please include the stack-protector patch Tags were: patch Tags added: wontfix > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administra

java.lang.reflect.Proxy missing from libgcj3

2002-12-04 Thread VEROK Istvan
The GCJ webpage boasts that java.lang.reflect.Proxy support was ported from GNU Classpath on September 29, and it's in their CVS, but it's not in any of the libgcj Debian packages. Is there any special reason for this? Thanks, Istvan

Bug#171232: marked as done (FTBFS: gcc-3.2 on sparc)

2002-12-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 4 Dec 2002 23:39:52 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#171232: FTBFS: gcc-3.2 on sparc has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

[sparc64] undefined symbols in /lib64/libc.so.6

2002-12-04 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: libc-sparc64 Version: 2.3.1-5 Severity: grave int main() { return 0; } $ gcc-3.[02] -O2 -m64 foo.c /lib64/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _PRIVATE' /lib64/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' /lib64/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PRO

Bug#171748: gcc-3.2: GCC doesn't accept the -a option

2002-12-04 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 01:30:21PM -0500, Paul Smith wrote: > Package: gcc-3.2 > Version: 1:3.2.1-0pre3 > Severity: normal > > Using GCC 3.2 with -a gives this error: > > gcc-3.2 -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/local/share/locale\" -DLIBDIR=\"/usr/local/lib\" > -DINCLUDEDIR=\"/usr/local/include\" -DHAVE_CO

Re: Bug#171699: gcc-3.2: please include the stack-protector patch

2002-12-04 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Martin Wuertele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please include the stack-protector patch from > http://www.trl.ibm.com/projects/security/ssp/gcc3_2/protector-3.2-5.tar.gz This wish is unlikely to be implemented. If you want to see this to become part of Debian gcc, I recommend that you first ask GC

Bug#171748: gcc-3.2: GCC doesn't accept the -a option

2002-12-04 Thread Paul Smith
Package: gcc-3.2 Version: 1:3.2.1-0pre3 Severity: normal Using GCC 3.2 with -a gives this error: gcc-3.2 -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/local/share/locale\" -DLIBDIR=\"/usr/local/lib\" -DINCLUDEDIR=\"/usr/local/include\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -g -pg -a -c ar.c cc1: unrecognized option `-a' Using the same

$$ CASINO !!!

2002-12-04 Thread CASINO DIITROYA !!!
Greetings from Casino Diitroya , world's premier Internet casino. You can play casino games like in Las Vegas, win real money instantly, right on your computer over the Internet. Winnings are rushed to you by credit card credit or a check in US$ mailed worldwide by first class mail. All new pla

Processed: Fix Daniel Burrows' submitter address (the old one bounces)

2002-12-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > submitter 42989 Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug#42989: [fixed gcc-2.95.1: g++ 'internal compiler error' messages Changed Bug submitter. > submitter 45943 Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug#45943: Please explain what grep does in its package

Bug#36876: c/6900: Floating point behaviour of gcc on pentium

2002-12-04 Thread bangerth
Synopsis: Floating point behaviour of gcc on pentium State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Wed Dec 4 07:01:59 2002 State-Changed-Why: Christian explained why. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6900

Bug#36876: c/6900: Floating point behaviour of gcc on pentium

2002-12-04 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Hi, This is not a bug. Comparing floating point numbers with == may yield unexpected results due to rounding errors. Someone please close this PR. regards Christian http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6900

Bug#171689: libstdc++3 depends on gcc-3

2002-12-04 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 12:48:17PM +0100, Marco Bodrato wrote: > Package: libstdc++3 > Version: 1:3.0.4-13 > Severity: minor > > I do not know the usual behaving in Debian, but I do not understand why the > library should depend on the gcc-compiler. I'm not using gcc-3.0 any more, > but I can not

Bug#171699: gcc-3.2: please include the stack-protector patch

2002-12-04 Thread Martin Wuertele
Package: gcc-3.2 Version: 1:3.2.1-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Please include the stack-protector patch from http://www.trl.ibm.com/projects/security/ssp/gcc3_2/protector-3.2-5.tar.gz Description available at http://www.trl.ibm.com/projects/security/ssp/ -- System Information: Debian Release

Bug#171689: libstdc++3 depends on gcc-3

2002-12-04 Thread Marco Bodrato
Package: libstdc++3 Version: 1:3.0.4-13 Severity: minor I do not know the usual behaving in Debian, but I do not understand why the library should depend on the gcc-compiler. I'm not using gcc-3.0 any more, but I can not uninstall it, because some pacages depend on libstdc++3 which depends on gcc-

Bug#171667: bits/c++config.h incorrect wrt to existence of long double math.h extensions

2002-12-04 Thread Herbert Valerio Riedel
Package: libstdc++5-dev Version: 1:3.2.1-0pre3 Severity: normal (I'm resending this bug, since I'm not sure it went out the first time) on debian/sparc /usr/include/c++/3.2/sparc-linux/bits/c++config.h states incorrectly the existence of long double c math functions, thus including causes the f