Processed: your mail

2002-01-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 83550 gcc-2.95 Bug#83550: [PR target/491] can't compile php4 on arm Bug#84969: [PR target/491] can't compile php4 on arm Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `gcc-2.95'. > severity 83550 fixed Bug#83550: [PR target/491] can't compile php4 on a

Re: Debian crosscompiler packages

2002-01-18 Thread Dr. David Alan Gilbert
* Matthias Klose ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Dr. David Alan Gilbert writes: > > Erm no; avr to be gcc-avr, alpha-linux to be gcc-alpha-linux ? > > assuming, that new Debian ports are made for bsd and cygwin, I would > prefer including the os name, even for linux. Erm - I'm confused. The OS n

Re: Debian crosscompiler packages

2002-01-18 Thread Matthias Klose
Dr. David Alan Gilbert writes: > * Hakan Ardo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > That I had written: > > > > Personally I'd prefer that the name is passed-as-is to the gcc/binutils > > > configures; because I normally know what to give those to get what I > > > want. I'd agree with adding the -linux i

Re: Missing symbols in LAPACK/PETSc

2002-01-18 Thread Phil Blundell
On Fri, 2002-01-18 at 02:18, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > So that would seem to make for two RC bugs: one against gcc-2.95 for > these LC* mystery symbols in fortran libs, and the other against > gcc-3.0_3.0.3-1 for not building, right? I think I looked at fixing this in 2.95 a long time ago and di

[±¤°í] Èû°Ü¿ü´ø ¿µ¾î! ÀÌÁ¦ ´Ù½Ã ½ÃÀÛÇϽʽÿÀ.

2002-01-18 Thread ¾ÆÀÌ·¯ºêÀ×±Û¸®½¬
Title: 될수밖에 없는 영어 - 아이러브잉글리쉬 YTN 뉴스 보기