Hi,
At Tue, 15 Jan 2002 01:58:36 +0100,
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Note that this problem is fixed in gcc-3.0 but I think
> > gcc-2.95 is important because it is the main C compiler
> > for Woody.
>
> How many translations are there available for gcc-2.95? Please send a
> patch
At Tue, 15 Jan 2002 02:12:52 +0100,
Martin v. Loewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Since we will have to prepare Woody's release soon, I think
> > the best way is to disable translation just now tempolarily
> > and then start the investigation of this problem.
>
> I recommend the same thing. G
> Since we will have to prepare Woody's release soon, I think
> the best way is to disable translation just now tempolarily
> and then start the investigation of this problem.
I recommend the same thing. Gettext support in gcc 2.95 is known not
to work; the GCC maintainers even claim that it is kn
> Note that this problem is fixed in gcc-3.0 but I think
> gcc-2.95 is important because it is the main C compiler
> for Woody.
How many translations are there available for gcc-2.95? Please send a
patch, if you think, it's important. IMO it would be better to
concentrate on translations for the c
Package: gcc-2.95
Version: 1:2.95.4-1
Severity: important
Translated messages of gcc-2.95/cpp-2.95/g++-2.95/g77-2.95 is not
displayed well. All non-ASCII characters are replaced with "?"
(question mark).
For example,
$ LANG=C gcc-2.95 foobar
gcc-2.95: foobar: No such file or directory
gcc-2.95:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002 14:31:04 +0300
"ALEXANDER SHISHCKIN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AS> I got trouble when upgrading from GCC 2.95 to 3.0.3.
AS> None of the programs are working with it saying that
AS> GNU C compiler can make binaries or so.
AS> Where can I get info on fixing this?
Please describ
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 04:01:45PM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>
> summary
> ---
> All binutils seem to build happily
> Gcc's are a lot more of a problem
Nice going!
>
> OK - so most of these look like they are after bits of libc and
> associated stuff; is it appropriate to use dpk
Hello!
I got trouble when upgrading from GCC 2.95 to 3.0.3.
None of the programs are working with it saying that
GNU C compiler can make binaries or so.
Where can I get info on fixing this?
Thanx
Title: 검색엔진 아이따따따
Brian Nelson wrote:
Juan Rey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
When I try to compile a program, this way :
g++ source1.cc object1.o
g++ source2.cc object2.o
Shouldn't these be:
g++ -c -o object1.o source1.cc
g++ -c -o object2.o source2.cc
?
..
..
g++ -g -O2 -o binary object1.o object2.o -llib1 -ll
10 matches
Mail list logo
