Bug#68452: marked as done (ash gets miscompiled on sparc32 with -O2)

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 13 Apr 2001 00:12:40 +0200 (MEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing gcc bug (ash on sparc) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#92771: marked as done (gcc-2.95 package description)

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:46:41 +0200 (MEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in gcc-2.95.3-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your resp

Bug#66642: marked as done (gcc272_2.7.2.3-16(unstable): Missing build dependencies)

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:49:30 +0200 (MEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in gcc272-2.7.2.3-17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#63154: marked as done (gcc 2.7.2.3 optimizer bug for long long comparisons)

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing gcc272 bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respons

Processed: retitle gcc bug

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 2910 [fixed in mainline (3.1)] GCC accepts multi-line strings without > \ or " " &c Bug#2910: GCC accepts multi-line strings without \ or " " &c Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#6047: marked as done ([Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] badly initialized union in gcc include file)

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing gcc272 bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respons

Bug#54544: marked as done (Missing definitions in /usr/include/asm/io.h)

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing gcc272 bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respons

Processed: retitle gcc bug

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 87909 [workaround applied] not installable on the Hurd Bug#87909: not installable on the Hurd Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#93786: arm-loop.dpatch

2001-04-12 Thread Philip Blundell
>just uploaded a 2.95.4 package from the branch to incoming. This will >fix #91823 as well? Oh, right, cool. Yes, it's the same bug. >btw, could you have a look at #90363? Yeah, I'd forgotten about that one. Fortran is in pretty bad shape on ARM, and I don't hold out all that much hope of get

Bug#93786: arm-loop.dpatch

2001-04-12 Thread Matthias Klose
Philip Blundell writes: > Package: gcc-2.95 > Version: 1:2.95.3-11 > > This patch fixes a problem compiling binutils on ARM. It's already > installed > on the 2.95 branch in CVS, but if future packages are going to use the > 2.95.3 > tarball it would be good to have this included. ju

Bug#50559: easy enough to create a cross compiler package ;-?

2001-04-12 Thread Matthias Klose
Ben, it's easier now with the README.cross and the support in 2.95.4 ...

Bug#5367: marked as done ([Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] gcc -O2 fails for INT_MIN < long long < INT_MAX)

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing gcc272 bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respons

Bug#4954: marked as done ([Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] cc -pipe hangs)

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing gcc272 bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respons

Bug#48726: marked as done ([fixed in gcc-2.9[67] branch] kernel 2.3.2[34] compiled with this gcc will not swap)

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing gcc272 bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respons

Bug#4430: marked as done ([Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] gcc -O coredumps)

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing gcc272 bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respons

Bug#4429: marked as done ([Fixed in {gcc,egcc}-2.92.21] gcc argument validation could be better)

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing gcc272 bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respons

Bug#34322: marked as done ([Fix in gcc-2.9x] [m68k] gcc-2.7.2.3-7 miscompiles apcalc_2.10.3t5.46-1)

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing gcc272 bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respons

Bug#26100: marked as done ([Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] gcc: -dynamic is not default as it should be)

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing gcc272 bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respons

Bug#24788: marked as done ([Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] gcc with -save-temps does not compile)

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing gcc272 bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respons

Bug#20889: marked as done ([Fixed in upstream {gcc,egcc}-2.92.21] Inconsistent results got by gcc-optimized code)

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing gcc272 bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respons

Bug#20606: marked as done ([Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] gcc: register variable corruption)

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing gcc272 bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respons

Bug#12375: marked as done ([Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] gcc: -O2 produces bad code !)

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing gcc272 bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respons

Bug#93786: arm-loop.dpatch

2001-04-12 Thread Philip Blundell
Package: gcc-2.95 Version: 1:2.95.3-11 This patch fixes a problem compiling binutils on ARM. It's already installed on the 2.95 branch in CVS, but if future packages are going to use the 2.95.3 tarball it would be good to have this included. #! /bin/sh -e # DP: Fix for SUBREG problems src=gc

gcc-2.95_2.95.3.ds5-11_i386.changes INSTALLED

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Installer
Installing: libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2_2.95.3-11_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2_2.95.3-11_i386.deb gpc-2.95_2.95.3-11_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/gpc-2.95_2.95.3-11_i386.deb gobjc-2.95_2.95.3-11_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/gobjc-2.95_2.95.3-11_i386.deb cpp-2.95

gcc-2.95 override disparity

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently installed upload and the override file for the following file(s): libstdc++2.10-dev_2.95.3-11_i386.deb: priority is overridden from optional to standard. g++-2.95_2.95.3-11_i386.deb: priority is overridden from optional to standard. libg++2.8.1.3-glibc2

Bug#93708: gcc: man versus info inconsistency (-W and -Wall)

2001-04-12 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Package: gcc Version: 1:2.95.3-7 Severity: normal Hi, The man page for gcc reads [...] -W Print extra warning messages for these events: [...] -Wall All of the above `-W' options combined. These are [...] Which I understand means -Wall implies -W. On the other hand