Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:46:41 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcc-2.95.3-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2001 16:49:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 03 11:49:44 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from burdell.cc.gatech.edu [130.207.3.207] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14kU00-0005JM-00; Tue, 03 Apr 2001 11:49:44 -0500
Received: from gaia.cc.gatech.edu (gaia.cc.gatech.edu [130.207.3.8])
by burdell.cc.gatech.edu (8.9.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA11871
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 12:49:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by gaia.cc.gatech.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA01028
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 12:49:36 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: gaia.cc.gatech.edu: yaner owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 12:49:35 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Patrick W. Yaner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gcc-2.95 package description
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gcc-2.95
Version: 2.95.3.ds5-10
The package description for this package (and every package the source
distribution builds) starts with the following note:
NOTE: This is not a final release, but taken from the CVS
gcc-2_95-branch (dated 20010125).
However, it looks from the upstream source and the debian/changelog file
that this is, in fact, the final release of gcc 2.95.3, and has been
since at least version 2.95.3.ds5-8. I just thought it would be a good
idea to correct this little note since it's not really true.
-Patrick W. Yaner ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 92771-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2001 21:47:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 12 16:47:43 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14nowJ-0003LM-00; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 16:47:43 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA07167
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:47:11 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id XAA19266;
Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:46:41 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:46:41 +0200 (MEST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed in gcc-2.95.3-11
X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs Lucid
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fixed in gcc-2.95.3-11
