[Petter Reinholdtsen]
> The Squeeze r1 is working just fine.
And to document the current status, I have helped Holger with the
http://jenkins.debian.net/ > project to automate the testing of
the Debian Edu Squeeze and Wheezy CDs. It is still work in progress,
but hopefully the Debian Edu install
[Mike Gabriel]
> Hi Petter,
Hi. Sorry for the confusion.
> Are you talking about future wheezy releases or the next squeeze-r1?
I was talking about wheezy, and wrote squeeze by mistake. The Squeeze
r1 is working just fine.
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
Hi Petter,
On Sa 01 Dez 2012 17:51:26 CET Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Petter Reinholdtsen 2012-09-09]
A good indicator for how much work is left to do is the result from the
self test after installation, which is the output from
/usr/sbin/debian-edu-test-install. Any 'error:'-line would be a
[Petter Reinholdtsen 2012-09-09]
> A good indicator for how much work is left to do is the result from the
> self test after installation, which is the output from
> /usr/sbin/debian-edu-test-install. Any 'error:'-line would be a problem
> that need to be investigated and addressed.
>
> Did you
[Holger Levsen 2012-08-15]
> And it seems we are not that far away, when I tested our wheezy CDs
> last week, there was basically just one big bummer: the tasks are not
> installed. See http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEdu/Status/Wheezy
A good indicator for how much work is left to do is the result f
On Mittwoch, 15. August 2012, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> After Holger's status report I actually think we should stay on SVN
> for D-E wheezy and focus on releasing Debian Edu 7.0.1-r1 (that is:
> with first point release of Debian wheezy).
why not aim for r0?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-edu-
Hi all,
On Mi 15 Aug 2012 12:47:00 CEST Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:33:03 +0200, Mike Gabriel
wrote:
Hi Petter, hi Holger, hi others,
what is the current policy for committing to Debian Edu SVN?
I would like to turn the questioning around, and ask what you believe
wo
Hi folks,
On Mi 15 Aug 2012 13:33:28 CEST Marius Kotsbak wrote:
Given the low level of progress at the moment, I wonder what it would
take to improve it, and thus what you believe would improve it. :)
I think moving to Git would improve it as well. Then it will be easier to
have different br
Hi Holger,
On Mi 15 Aug 2012 13:30:31 CEST Holger Levsen wrote:
yes, we have squeeze+wheezy branches in svn. (I didnt have the time for git
migration when I did the wheezy branches, thats basically the only reason why
thats svn and not git.)
So any commit that goes to squeeze should go to the
Hi Mike,
On Dienstag, 14. August 2012, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> what is the current policy for committing to Debian Edu SVN?
Honestly (and sadly) I think the correct+current answer is: "there is none"
I'd be happy to see this changed, though.
>o what kind of bugs do we fix (there are several)
2012/8/15 Petter Reinholdtsen
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:33:03 +0200, Mike Gabriel <
> mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de> wrote:
> > Hi Petter, hi Holger, hi others,
> >
> > what is the current policy for committing to Debian Edu SVN?
>
> I would like to turn the questioning around, and ask what you
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:33:03 +0200, Mike Gabriel
wrote:
> Hi Petter, hi Holger, hi others,
>
> what is the current policy for committing to Debian Edu SVN?
I would like to turn the questioning around, and ask what you believe
would be a sensible policy currently for committing to the Debian Edu
12 matches
Mail list logo
