Hello,
I have a client that needs Mono 2.4 and other related components
packaged for various reasons, and for various other reasons needs
_that_ to be packaged with a 1 binary per 1 upstream source package
mapping. I am trying to accomplish this task, but I am failing
something awful. I am hopin
On 2009-04-16 09:19 +0200, Michael B. Trausch wrote:
> I have a client that needs Mono 2.4 and other related components
> packaged for various reasons, and for various other reasons needs
> _that_ to be packaged with a 1 binary per 1 upstream source package
> mapping. I am trying to accomplish th
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:56:16 +0200
Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2009-04-16 09:19 +0200, Michael B. Trausch wrote:
>
> > When I look at libboo2.0-cil's information, it says that it Depends
> > on libmono-corlib2.0-cil (>= 1.2.2.1) (my package replaces that
> > one, and the package version is 2.4), an
On Di, 14 Apr 2009, Norbert Preining wrote:
> New version attached, thanks for reviewing
Any comments on that?
And, comments on upload to experimental or unstable?
I want to upload that before tomorrow because tomorrow I am leaving for
one week in Switzerland. That would be a good time to let it
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Di, 14 Apr 2009, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > New version attached, thanks for reviewing
>
> Any comments on that?
Looks fine for me. I would have avoided bashisms but since you explicitely
use bash, it's ok.
> And, comments on upload to experimen
On Do, 16 Apr 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Looks fine for me. I would have avoided bashisms but since you explicitely
> use bash, it's ok.
Sorry, I always and ever programmed if in sh then for bash. I have no
idea what are bashism and what not. If you send a dash-compliant version
it would be fi
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Do, 16 Apr 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Looks fine for me. I would have avoided bashisms but since you explicitely
> > use bash, it's ok.
>
> Sorry, I always and ever programmed if in sh then for bash. I have no
> idea what are bashism and what
On Do, 16 Apr 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Try running it with #!/bin/dash and you can also use checkbashism (of
> devscripts) to verify your script.
Ok, maybe for one of the next versions ...
> > Yes, but NEW will take at least a week, so I will do it now.
>
> Not if we prod an ftp assistant
8 matches
Mail list logo
