On Do, 16 Apr 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Looks fine for me. I would have avoided bashisms but since you explicitely
> use bash, it's ok.
Sorry, I always and ever programmed if in sh then for bash. I have no
idea what are bashism and what not. If you send a dash-compliant version
it would be fine for me to include that, but I am not able to do it
myself.
> Let's go to experimental first so that we can better control when it lands
> in unstable.
Fine, will do that tomorrow or today.
> It's best to start this when you are around anyway, so experimental is
> better.
Yes, but NEW will take at least a week, so I will do it now.
Best wishes
Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <prein...@logic.at> Vienna University of Technology
Debian Developer <prein...@debian.org> Debian TeX Group
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GREELEY (n.)
Someone who continually annoys you by continually apologising for
annoying you.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
