should be spelled
out in the GR, in the latter I think it is unnecessary since everyone
actively involved in the postings in question have already been asked
and it's more of a "speak up now or remain forever silent".
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ffect bugs against foo. I am unsure whether
comma notation is allowed (so katie could generate "package bar,wnpp" at
the beginning of bug closing emails).
Simon
--- Begin Message ---
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package test
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: test
does not.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
exactly that (there is an inter-proxy protocol); it will
take a bit to configure it to let .deb files live longer than other
files (since they don't change), but should not be too hard). The only
thing it doesn't do is load balancing the DSL lines.
Simon
signature.asc
Descriptio
o the
extent Debian has is related to the "single-user with sudo" approach
they have taken, but this is not a solution.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
as a way to grant
limited privileges to users, while in fact they are meant as a way to
remove privileges from system services that do not need them.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
that someone has been
abusing their service and that it may be in their interest to implement
something so that it can be detected who did it.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
s/betas tested by the majority
of users? Do people think that this is the sort of thing that should
just be uploaded to unstable and allowed to flow into testing?
Simon.
--
-+// &q
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 10:11:55AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 02:03:37PM +0000, Simon Huggins wrote:
> > Is there any better way I can get snapshots/betas tested by the
> > majority of users? Do people think that this is the sort of thing
> >
use
we're in the #1 spot.
You can find a summary of instructions at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/01/msg01444.html
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: ussp-push
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Davide Libenzi
* URL : http://www.xmailserver.org/ussp-push.html
* License
ed fine. What did we miss?
--
Simon Huggins \ If at first you don't succeed, you'll get lots of advice.
\
http://www.earth.li/~huggie/htag.pl 0.0.22
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
s required tools
> not in debian to build, and it has tons of references to features that
> could not be put in the debian version -- either due to patent issues or
> depending on removed libraries.
Go on, you know you want to.
Simon.
--
UK based domain, email and web
nism to select them...NOT!).
This message shall serve as a starting point for discussion. Please CC
the bug in replies.
Simon
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (50, 'experimental')
Architecture: powe
o get that done. I had somehow expected that
the bug report and any followups are forwarded to -devel to spark
discussion, so I'm explicitly forwarding it there.
Simon, would this help with the problem you mentionned?
Not entirely, since it isn't limited to browsers or termina
es that are strictly for
build-indep / binary-indep only to be moved to Build-Depends-Indep. This
will break building those packages with older dpkg-buildpackage unless
care is taken to also install B-D-I, so I'd have no problem at all to
postpone this step until after the etch release.
Questions? Comments? Seconds?
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
here. Thus, only the FSF may build the binutils package. I'd be very
surprised if that were to meet your definition of free software.
Simon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hus the simple majority suffices, or it could be argued
that it failed supermajority, hence modifies a foundation document,
hence requires supermajority. And it *will* be argued, no doubt.
Simon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
chown and chmod to work and be
persistent enough to remain in effect until the target exits.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ion) as well as on a enable/disable level, where I could
tell my laptop to not talk to the weirdos hanging out in the airport lounge.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
is located in the US AFAIK, not the ftpmasters.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi!
Just a little note on the chosen new logo:
It says "Debian / GNU Linux". Isn't the project called "Debian GNU/Linux"?
Just wondering... Otherwise, the logo is very nice.
--
Simon Kågedal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Homepage: http://www.sdf.se/~simon/
--
TO UNSUBS
ages could
be autobuilt.
That sounds more like a case of too-loose build-dependencies to me
rather than architecture specific problems. This can also hit i386, the
fact that it hit ARM this time is sheer coincidence.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ime when necessary?
(think installing via a USB ADSL modem like a speedtouch)
Simon.
--
"There's no emoticon for what I'm feeling!" -- Comic Book Guy, The Simpsons.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
'd say.
Not quite unlikely. In fact ACPI support for the Pegasos is on my todo
list. :-)
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Not quite unlikely. In fact ACPI support for the Pegasos is on my todo
list. :-)
>Umm, why?
Because it is the only way you can shut down PM capable PCI cards.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
to do with power management of individual devices.
ACPI also handles individual devices. You can put individual devices
into one of three sleep levels and get them back, at least in theory.
This may help a lot with graphics boards, as some have the super-secret
init sequence as AML in their SSDT
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: schism
Version : 0.2a
Upstream Author : chisel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://rigelseven.com/schism/
* License : GPL
Description : Impulse Tracker c
Hi,
> maybe we should rename sound into multimedia and populate it with video
> players too ?
Seconded.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
Torsten Landschoff schrieb:
> Suggestions how to fix that for real before getting sarge out of the
> door with this risk that I don't feel I can estimate?
Build a dumy libldap.so.2 with the same SONAME that consists of a NEEDED
entry for libldap_r.so.2 only.
Simon
si
Adrian, I've noticed lately that almost every post you send is about the
release; Pointing out problems with some feature or other of it or with
the actions of the hard working people who are trying to get sarge out
the door.
Do you think you could manage to leave your critisms til next week when
in another lib, maybe DT_FILTER
might help.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: asedrive3e
Version : 2.2
Upstream Author : Athena Smartcard Solutions
* URL : http://www.athena-scs.com
* License : BSDish
Description : PC/SC driver for
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2005-05-31
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: elektra
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Avi Alkalay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://elektra.sourceforge.net/
* License : BSD
Description : A framework to store configurat
ml
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/05/msg00010.html
[3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/04/msg00023.html
[4] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/04/msg3.html
--
Simon [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] *\ "You heard of Kung Fu? Well get
hat arch.
Though I say all this having never looked at the source.
--
Simon Huggins \ "I have this terrible pain in all the diodes down my
\ left side." - Marvin
http://www.earth.li/~huggie/htag.pl 0.0.22
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
lately where people have
finally crawled out of the woodwork to say please let such and such a
package in.
Has anyone stepped forwards to do release management of etch? What are
their ideas of what's achievable?
Simon.
--
Black Cat Networks-("Her na
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 06:22:15PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 02:18:28PM +0100, Simon Huggins wrote:
> > I think having a target date, even a target month for release, would
> > help everyone and reduce the posts to -release lately where people
> >
or just seeing what's going to happen? Do you
know if Ubuntu going to support the new format during etch's testing
phase (say 18 months for argument's sake)?
Simon.
--
* "They were trying to manipulate behaviour. Alter people's *
| decision making - what to buy, who
irefox then they have to rename
it. I see no problem here. Debian has proved it only wants to do nice,
fluffy things to firefox, Gervase is being accomodating as far as I can
tell.
Why do you want to make Debian the distribution that users moan about
shipping iceweasel when there is no reason not t
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 12:07:16PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> * Simon Huggins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 02:16:18AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > > * Marco d'Itri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Like others in this thread I disagree
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 01:03:52AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> * Simon Huggins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 12:07:16PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > > Indeed the most pragmatic thing to do is to keep the name. But you
> > > don't fee
sion that downstreams could call the packages
firefox as they had been blessed with official Debian penguin pee as
long as they didn't then change them and it was only when they were
modified that they potentially had to go to the Mozilla Foundation for a
license.
Did I get the wrong end
#260720]
> * Orphaned 327 days ago
I cannot find this one on powerpc.
> moria -- A roguelike game with an infinite dungeon [#274472]
> * Orphaned 255 days ago
I think that would be a shame. As I don't play it myself, I might not be
the best choice for a maintainer, but I&#
hrough a smarthost that you authenticate to
on the outbound way as well (this will have the added benefit of not
clogging up your connection if you need to send an email to multiple
people).
Simon
[1] Numbers pulled entirely from where the sun don't shine, and based on
me reading 48h worth o
ld not allow you to send amounts of mail that
greylisting would adversely affect you. :-)
Simon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
has been pretty reliable (and in
fact, your IP is not listed there).
Simon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
something like 8 hours
> (they seem to be better ATM).
> Using my own server I would at least _know_ what was happening to my
> mails.
Yes, that is a valid reason, although being able to check manually sort
of implies that you don't have a lot of traffic.
Simon
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
will depend on icewmpc)?
I might be horribly wrong with this, but I dimly remember that in the
case that the dummy package depends on a package that conflicts and
provides the dummy, apt will not upgrade with "upgrade" and switch over
to the new package on "dist-upgrade".
S
t rename
> your package based on some personal differences with the mozilla
> trademark policy.
He's not intending to rename it or accept the trademark agreement if you
read the original post AFAIK.
Simon.
--
oOoOourpmi, rpm, dpkg, apt... connais pas tout ca oOoOo
oOoOo moi... mo
Salut Gervase!
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 11:46:55PM +0100, Gervase Markham wrote:
> Simon Huggins wrote:
> >That's unfair. I would have summarised more as "there's no problem
> >doing so as long as Mozilla are reasonable in Debian's eyes". I don't
>
nly that within a group, you cannot even point at somebody
and say they are responsible for anything.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
as to why subversion beats them
> all, in your perception.
It is centralized, so you have an authoritative source and need not talk
to the other team members to synchronize.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ore rapidly, getting bugs
>found and fixed faster. this is particularly relevant for d-i,
>and has been for years now.
I'm not sure it scales that well if you apply it to the entire archive,
due to the overhead of the mirror pulse. It might make sense to have
"mini-pulses" for parts of the archive, such as d-i.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
t;Everybody, everybody's dead, everybody's dead )--
--( Dave." - Holly )--
Simon ( ) Nomis
Htag.pl 0.0.22
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
oo...
> Comments, suggestions?
Keep them separated.
Simon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ploads to experimental from that branch of packaging.
Simon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bug #390664 inspired me to look in source packages for IETF RFC/I-D's
> too, and the situation seem to be more problematic. I've put a list
> of packages in testing (as of a few days ago, my mirror is slow) that
> appear
Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> http://wiki.debian.org/NonFreeIETFDocuments
>
> A useful thing to add to that page would be simple instructions on how
> those authoring IETF documents could make them available under a
> DFSG-
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Simon Josefsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061016 13:19]:
>> I went over many packages looking for names of likely non-free files,
>> and there may be false positives. If this is the case for your
>> package, I'm sorry for t
Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [Simon Josefsson]
>> Do you have suggestions to improve the situation?
>
> I would suspect manual inspection of each file, and only file bugs for
> the files with real license problems. Using the file name to guess
&g
e copyright file gives a 404:
<http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/subversion.html>. Probably a
temporary problem...
/Simon
[1] Old e-mail:
From: RFC Editor
Subject: Re: Copyright and copying conditions for RFC 1510?
To: Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: RFC Editor
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002
Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 01:48:50PM +0200, Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > * Simon Josefsson ([EMAIL PROTE
red using the same filename. The diff output for all of them
suggests that these are real IETF documents, though.
/Simon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> The second problem seems to be generic. The reason I looked at
>> packages in testing was that they are the packages that are going to
>> be released, and if I
display publicly any such
derivative works, in any form and in all languages,
and to
authorize others to do so.
Perhaps talking to ISOC about this would help.
So there can be more than 79 false positives...
I don't yet see any way for that to hold.
/Simon
--
ng a torrent for the NTSC version on my
tracker, please contact me.
Simon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rs/2006/11/threads.html#2
The up to date script is available at http://www.debian.org/mirrors/anonftpsync
> and then notify all mirror admins to also update their scripts?
Sure, updating anonftpsync was only the first step, the second one will
come soon.
Regards,
--
Simon Paillard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Robbie schrieb:
I'm trying to determine if their is an API that allows the user program to
change the scheduler timeslice. Is there any?
Changing the slices doesn't make much of a difference -- I'd just give
the process with special needs some realtime privilege.
sing that existing projects that send to a project mailing
list should change and send to the PTS and if so can you put forward
some reasons?
I'm just curious really.
--
Simon [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] *\ "Peace and understanding through \**
** ]-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-[ **\bru
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 08:49:58AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Simon Huggins wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 11:13:13PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > * All existing packaging projects should use svnmailer to send SVN diffs
> > > to the
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 03:46:36PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Simon Huggins wrote:
> > I'll go look at adding the PTS to pkg-xfce now anyway.
> Thanks!
Except as discussed on IRC in #alioth it sends to the first package
affected if many packages are
there a better
way to handle this? What severity should I use?
Some additional filtering should probably be done, some earlier RFC
are (I believe) in the public domain.
Thanks,
Simon
usr/lib/GNUstep/System/Library/Documentation/Developer/rfc1459.txt [84]libs/gnu
usr/share/doc
libs/libsasl2
mail/fml
mail/messagewall
net/atftpd
net/bidentd
net/dhcp3-common
net/freeradius
net/heimdal-docs
net/ircd-irc2
net/ircd-ircu
net/openswan
net/stunnel
net/zenirc
text/xml2rfc
web/araneida
web/cl-aserve
web/phpgroupware-calendar
The complete file list below.
/Simon
usr/lib/GNUstep/S
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Simon Josefsson:
>
>> text/xml2rfc
>
> From the debian/copyright file:
>
> | The software is released under the following license. Note that the
> | output produced by xml2rfc may include more restrictive copyrigh
Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday 28 April 2006 13:34, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> The following packages appear to contain IETF RFCs/drafts, and I'll
>> file bug reports for them:
>
> As per good mass filing practices, can you create a linda/linti
he GPL, such as the revised BSD
license.
>> Seconds, since when do we consider the GPL to be viral?
>
> Don't know about you, but the FSF does - it has created the LGPL because
> of this.
That doesn't mean libraries shouldn't be licensed under the GPL, see
<
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:46:
they might well
be fixed by this version I thought consensus was to try to describe what
it was about this release that fixes these bugs.
--
--( "And what have they ever given us in return?")--
--( "The aqueduct?"
the first
place. I'd be happy (as one of the xfce guys) for everyone to use the
same priority to be honest.
--
Simon [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] *\ "Emergency! Emergency! There's an \**
** ]-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-[ **\
ust pushing this out to libfoo-bin:i386 contains
/usr/bin/foo and likewise libfoo-bin:amd64 and getting the conflict
there.
How do you resolve that?
Simon
--
... "You still here Basil?" - Sybil "No, I went a couple of minutes ago,
dear, but I expect I'll be back soon
uot; the
binary packages, and binaryless source packages are AFAIK handled by
rene (archive cleanup tool).
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
* NTP server
(some work required; currently, not-really-maintained by the Debian
NTP Team, which consists of zero active members)
I'll take it.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ckage to the archive that *can never be
installed*?
Hm, that used to be a "magic" combination that would let dpkg do the
right thing.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
l I'd like to have a
co-maintainer for the package. Anyone else interested? I'd create an SVN
repository on my server or alioth.
I have no problem with co-maintenance, but I'd have a problem with svn.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Simon Kelley
dnsmasq 2.31-1
Looks pretty trivial, it will fixed in the next upstream/upload.
Cheers,
Simon.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Joe Smith schrieb:
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
AIUI, there is no need to CC debian-devel with ITP's, as debian-devel
normally gets them anyway.
Not quite. X-Debbugs-Cc: is how debian-devel gets a copy of ITPs.
Simon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
r any clues as to how on earth this can happen.
If you do want to relibtoolize then install xfce4-dev-ools and run
xdt-autogen in the package dirrectory.
Thanks.
Simon.
heh, good sigmonster.
--
oOoOo Open source is about letting go of complete control. Accept oOoOo
oOoOo the fact that othe
g Recommends for that. The definition for
Recommends used to be "you may not install these, but you should have a
reason for it", which is exactly the foo/foo-data case.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
lpers that have unexpected side effects when your deployment deviates
from the norm.
> Unfortunatly I think you just aren't smart enough to read
> the writing on the wall that there is a reason Ubuntu has been for a
> while now such a more popular distro then us.
Yes, it's called "marketing".
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
, however it gets the authentication data
from the sending user's home directory and is more likely to be suited
for laptop installations only.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 02:57:57PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 05:26:35PM +0000, Simon Huggins wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> There are currently 11 orphaned xfce4-* packages in unstable, including
> three that have just been rem
so Bug #262032.
Simon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 10:22:14AM +0100, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> * [ 17-01-05 - 01:50 ] Simon Huggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There were some packages that made it to mentors.debian.net - and there
> > is still some work up there.
> > http://mentors.de
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gnome-blosxom
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Chris Ladd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gnome-blosxom.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : Gnome Bloxsom is a GUI based program to post entries
much, the above was a twisted-humor way to say
that in my humble opinion, encrypt-only is OK, and, in the US, DES is OK
and if you are a big computer copmpany with a powerful loby in DC, you
can do what you please.
Simon
P.S. Yea, Teleport.com is still silly and my senmail is still crazy
If my memory serves me; /sbin was originally for statically linked
executables which are indeed needed for system restoration (while shlibs
are none). This IS where emergency stuff should be. Check UnixWare,
/bin is symlinked to /usr/bin, I think...
Simon
P.S. Yea, Teleport.com is still
for help or patience. I'll get to it some day. Really.
Simon
P.S. Yea, Teleport.com is still silly and my senmail is still crazy,
Please ignore the below address and flame [EMAIL PROTECTED]
He receives and answers mail :-)
Simon Shapiro
What happened to netpbm. I just picked a copy from GNU. Why isn't
pbmplus free?
Thanx,
Simon
P.S. Yea, Teleport.com is still silly and my senmail is still crazy,
Please ignore the below address and flame [EMAIL PROTECTED]
He receives and answers mail :-)
Simon Sh
/usr/src/Kernels/1.x.yy. When i get a new kernel (say
1.3.46), all I do is (cd /usr/src/Kernels/`.3.46/linux; rm
/usr/src/linux; ln -s `pwd` /usr/src/linux). All this NOT as root (as
would be needed in the case of tinkering with /usr/include).
Of course I may be wrong, but
Simon
P.S
101 - 200 of 2429 matches
Mail list logo
