i/sha256/?checksum=c4a26b58ec236eab6919435af0267c29840191a97beeb3caa4712e42a6d51be8
which might permit some pre-filtering of the list of packages to inspect.
regards
Stuart
--
Stuart Prescott http://www.nanonanonano.net/ stu...@nanonanonano.net
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org/ stu...@debian.org
GPG fingerprint 9
For those playing along at home...
On 19/08/2024 14:53, Stuart Prescott wrote:
url=$(curl -s
https://sources.debian.org/api/src/zzuf/0.15-4/debian/gbp.conf/ | jq -r
.raw_url)
The API URL should obviously be
https://sources.debian.org/api/src/$pkg/latest/debian/gbp.conf/
and
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stuart Prescott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: latexdraw
Version : 1.9.3
Upstream Author : Arnaud BLOUIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://latexdraw.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Programmin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stuart Prescott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: java-imaging-utilities
Version : 0.14.2
Upstream Author : Marco Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://schmidt.devlib.org/jiu/`
* License : GPL
Prog
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stuart Prescott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libwmfview-java
Version : 0.8.1
Upstream Author : Marco Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://latexdraw.sf.net/
* License : GPL
Programmin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stuart Prescott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: jlibeps
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Arnaud BLOUIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://jlibeps.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPLv2 or later
Programmin
find more
information about that in this thread.
A little empathy for fellow developers, a little time looking in the mirror
and some effort to see things from other perspectives would go a long way
and be greatly appreciated.
Stuart
--
Stuart Prescotthttp://www.nanonanonano.net/ stu.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stuart Prescott
* Package name: python-diff-match-patch
Version : 20121119
Upstream Author : Neil Fraser
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/diff-match-patch
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python 2 and 3
t's
quite feasible to extend that script to prepare a list of version→arch
mappings for each source package.
cheers
Stuart
--
Stuart Prescotthttp://www.nanonanonano.net/ stu...@nanonanonano.net
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org/ stu...@debian.org
GPG fingerprint90E2 D2C1
/main/Contents-source.gz
- --
Stuart Prescott www.nanoNANOnano.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAk/Ye/oACgkQn+i4zXHF0ai1hQCguRLGOfvM1BrOKlhAcH8YsPtw
ZmsAn0gjtAi1YRF03VyT/yYgBoxLbjvT
=Hwvn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stuart Prescott
* Package name: cssmin
Version : 0.1.4
Upstream Author : Zachary Voase
* URL : http://github.com/zacharyvoase/cssmin
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Python
Description : YUI CSS compression
iles; I think we're good at misidentifying which files are
configuration files.
So in all these other cases including traditional unix tools and our own
tools that we use on a daily basis, we manage to have defaults *not* in /etc
and the local configuration files that change the defaults in /e
gmane.org
[2] I would encourage them to let their sponsors know this since the
sponsors are in the position of helping care for their packages anyway
- --
Stuart Prescotthttp://www.nanonanonano.net/ stu...@nanonanonano.net
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org/ stu...@debian.org
G
120313 version, which is why it's still there in the ia64 port.
[1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gcc-snapshot&suite=sid
--
Stuart Prescotthttp://www.nanonanonano.net/ stu...@nanonanonano.net
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org/ stu...@debian.org
GPG fin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stuart Prescott
* Package name: i18nspector
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Jakub Wilk
* URL : http://jwilk.net/software/i18nspector
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: python
Description : checking tool for
Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > Stuart Prescott also tried demoting this Pre-Dependency to Depends and
> > showed that the very same upgrade failure occurs. So this is not an
> > option.
>
> The conclusion here is that the only way to fix this bug in sgml-base is
> to have
tive implementation etc) but that still isn't
build-deps.
(I don't know if that's what Jakub had in mind, but that's my 2¢)
cheers
Stuart
[1] Where possible, separate tests for Depends, Depends+Recommends,
Depends+Recommends+Suggests would seem even better t
't pretend that the examples are universally useful though and a
README to that effect would be appropriate.
Of course if they just worked with octave, then that would be even better.
cheers
Stuart
--
Stuart Prescotthttp://www.nanonanonano.net/ stu...@nanonanonano.net
Debian D
e not been
implemented in Debian or have been implemented differently in Debian -- it's
not a substitute for having this in Policy)
Hope that helps
Stuart
--
Stuart Prescotthttp://www.nanonanonano.net/ stu...@nanonanonano.net
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org/ stu...@debian.org
Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Stuart Prescott debian.org> writes:
>
>> Unfortunately, the people who understand multiarch well enough to write
>> it up for policy haven't done so which leaves us with no normative
>> documentation in policy for the the Multi-Arch fiel
e"
to then seek a change in policy. (And as observed recently, this also means
that when given a choice between A and B, we end up choosing A, B, C and Z
[2].)
cheers
Stuart
[1] #723586
[2] http://lists.debian.org/87y4zc3jix.fsf%40windlord.stanford.edu
--
Stuart Prescotthttp://www.n
of source packages in each release:
http://ircbots.debian.net/stats/package_ages.png
(note: this is based on source package uploads; binNMUs not included)
--
Stuart Prescotthttp://www.nanonanonano.net/ stu...@nanonanonano.net
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org/
o that puts git as the declared VCS for > 50% source packages (and leading
the next most popular by almost a factor of 4).
--
Stuart Prescotthttp://www.nanonanonano.net/ stu...@nanonanonano.net
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org/ stu...@debian.org
GPG fingerprint90E2 D2C1
ebci looks in d/control
or in the dsc (or in Sources) to find packages to test.
[1] http://sources.debian.net/src/dpkg/1.17.25/ChangeLog/#L6457
[2] http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/debci.git/tree/README.md#n15
cheers
Stuart
--
Stuart Prescotthttp://www.nanonano
: source-format 3.0 (quilt)
$ lintian --version
Lintian v2.12.0~bpo9+1
FYI for prottest, you could set the locale detail LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 for the
entire debian/rules rather than only for the dh call.
Stuart
--
Stuart Prescotthttp://www.nanonanonano.net/ stu...@nanonanonano.net
Debian D
r Qt6 to include them
upstream.
regards
Stuart
--
Stuart Prescotthttp://www.nanonanonano.net/ stu...@nanonanonano.net
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org/ stu...@debian.org
GPG fingerprint90E2 D2C1 AD14 6A1B 7EBB 891D BBC1 7EBB 1396 F2F7
bullseye
Package: libc6 bullseye/amd64
bullseye: 2.29-7
$ udd-cache versions no-such-package --release bullseye
No package named 'no-such-package' was found in bullseye/amd64.
cheers
Stuart
--
Stuart Prescotthttp://www.nanonanonano.net/ stu...@nanonanonano.net
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org/ stu...@debian.org
GPG fingerprint90E2 D2C1 AD14 6A1B 7EBB 891D BBC1 7EBB 1396 F2F7
against this goal. It will remove the package from this list and makie
it look like the the package has been uploaded with some maintenance, while
changing nothing.)
cheers
Stuart
--
Stuart Prescotthttp://www.nanonanonano.net/ stu...@nanonanonano.net
Debian Developer http://www.debia
-importing source packages is a challenge.
Ahh... and I take it that's not configurable in dak. So reuploading the
packages would solve half the problem (hashes) but not the other half
(signatures).
cheers
Stuart
--
Stuart Prescotthttp://www.nanonanonano.net/ stu...@nanonanonan
s://people.debian.org/~stuart/copyright.tar.xz
Happy for suggestions, merge requests etc!
cheers
Stuart
--
Stuart Prescotthttp://www.nanonanonano.net/ stu...@nanonanonano.net
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org/ stu...@debian.org
GPG fingerprint90E2 D2C1 AD14 6A1B 7EBB 891D
ainer Dashboard also show when new commits
are made.
(Thanks to Paul Wise for creating this a couple of years ago when I was musing
on how to track this sort
of upstream)
cheers
Stuart
--
Stuart Prescotthttp://www.nanonanonano.net/ stu...@nanonanonano.net
Debian Developer http://www.debian.
ty: certain
N:
N: Check: python, Type: source, binary
N:
--
Stuart Prescotthttp://www.nanonanonano.net/ stu...@nanonanonano.net
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org/ stu...@debian.org
GPG fingerprint90E2 D2C1 AD14 6A1B 7EBB 891D BBC1 7EBB 1396 F2F7
gainst my chosen background. That usually
means increasing saturation and decreasing lightness for the colours. The
dpkg-source warning you showed appears as a brownish colour and is perfectly
legible for me.
cheers
Stuart
--
Stuart Prescotthttp://www.nanonanonano.net/ stu...@nanonanona
> What is the sequence of Debian release names?
In addition to the other answers, machine readable data are in the package
distro-info-data:
/usr/share/distro-info/debian.csv
See "apt-cache rdepends distro-info-data" for shell, python and perl
bindings.
Stuart
--
St
aces where
the output is captured; the talk by Ralf and Nicholas at DebConf is well
worth watching.
https://debconf18.debconf.org/talks/90-mining-debian-maintainer-scripts/
Not restricting the search to maintainer scripts finds many many more...
it's a common enough mistake.
regards
Stuart
-
Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> Yes. Is "environment-modules" well-known these days? I'm surprised not
> to see it mentioned more often.
Indeed, environment-modules and direnv and excellent tools for this sort of
game.
--
Stuart Prescotthttp://www.nanonanonano.net/ st
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stuart Prescott
* Package name: python-backports.csv
Version : 1.0.6
Upstream Author : Python Software Foundation
* URL : https://github.com/ryanhiebert/backports.csv
* License : Python Software Foundation License v 2
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stuart Prescott
* Package name: dh-curl-sudo-bash
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Lars Wirzenius and Stuart Prescott
* URL : http://deb.li/U67E
* License : BSD 3 clause
Programming Lang: POSIX shell, Perl
an/dists/sid/main/binary-amd64/Packages.xz
[7,547 kB]
Fetched 7,547 kB in 5s (1,446 kB/s)
$ /usr/lib/apt/apt-helper cat-file Packages.xz | less
(this only looks at the repo and doesn't address package compression which
Guillem discussed elsewhere)
--
Stuart Prescotthttp://www.nan
on that the new-alioth provides that
will replace the existing mailing lists as a way for users and maintainer
teams to communicate to discuss development, bugs and provide support?
thanks
Stuart
--
Stuart Prescotthttp://www.nanonanonano.net/ stu...@nanonanonano.net
Debian Devel
-no-python3-foo is a much more important problem that really
does need addressing *right* *now*. If it's easy to do then just do it; if
it's hard to do, then now is past the time to start talking to upstream
about it to make it happen.
https://lintian.debian.org/tags/dependency-on-pyth
An impressive achievement indeed.
I started collecting some data on source packages vs time a few years ago.
It also shows some of the rhythm of the development cycle:
http://ircbots.debian.net/stats/
cheers
Stuart
--
Stuart Prescotthttp://www.nanonanonano.net/ stu
ase = 'sid'
AND (vcs_url IS NULL OR vcs_url NOT LIKE '%salsa%');
count
---
3906
regards
Stuart
--
Stuart Prescott http://www.nanonanonano.net/ stu...@nanonanonano.net
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org/ stu...@debian.org
GPG fingerprint 90E2 D2C1 AD14 6A1B 7EBB 891D BBC1 7EBB 1396 F2F7
. Note that the salsa
error "could not read Username" in the table is not a misconfiguration -
it means that the repo couldn't be obtained anonymously, which could be
that it doesn't exist, or that it needs permissions - both are wrong for
Debian.
SELECT
source, url, error
ON s.source = h.source AND s.version = h.version
WHERE
release = 'sid'
AND vcs_url ~ '/(git|svn|alioth).debian.org'
GROUP BY
year
ORDER BY
year ASC;
SELECT
maintainer, COUNT(*)
FROM sources
WHERE
release = 'sid'
AND vcs_url ~ '/(git|svn|
45 matches
Mail list logo
