Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Stuart Prescott <stuart <at> debian.org> writes: > >> Unfortunately, the people who understand multiarch well enough to write >> it up for policy haven't done so which leaves us with no normative >> documentation in policy for the the Multi-Arch field in Packages, no >> description of how the package manager should deal with multi-arch >> packages and their dependencies and no documentation of best practices >> for -dev packages etc. > > This can be read as "M-A in its current form is RC-buggy and must > not be released". With the obvious follow-ups (revert M-A perl/python > in sid, as Guillem said).
I'd rather that we just sorted out some real documentation for it and then fixed the bugs in our tools that we have due to things like :any appearing. Stuart -- Stuart Prescott http://www.nanonanonano.net/ stu...@nanonanonano.net Debian Developer http://www.debian.org/ stu...@debian.org GPG fingerprint 90E2 D2C1 AD14 6A1B 7EBB 891D BBC1 7EBB 1396 F2F7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/lj0lgj$fu4$1...@ger.gmane.org
