On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 06:00:06PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Malloc debugging, #285685 suggests it is broken for > 300 days now,
> either update or remove:
>
>Steve M. Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ccmallocBuild-Depends: g++-2.95 [alpha arm
Howdy,
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 02:18:29AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> We will get rid of g++-3.3 for the etch release and remove the
> g++-3.3 package.
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 12:54:22AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> We would like to get rid of g++-3.4 for the etch release, although
> curre
Hello,
I made the mistake of adding "make check" to debian/rules. Now minc
won't build on certain architectures. It builds on i386 (my
architecture), ia64, s390, and powerpc. It fails on alpha, sparc,
mips, hppa, arm, and mipsel.
I poked around on a few of the debian machines (vore, paer, caba
For the Debian-devel folks just tuning in: we're debating how to
introduce a SOVERSION to the ITK libraries that lack it upstream. The
current thread starts at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2006/02/msg00037.html
Your input is welcomed.
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 03:23:47PM +1100, Gavin B
Howdy,
Suppose you're a debian developer with limited time each week for
Debian. You get a bug report because your package fails to build on
architecture X. When you have your 2 hour window to sit down and fix
things, you log in to one of the project machines of the appropriate
architecture, apt
Laszlo said:
> On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 15:01 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be nice if you could simply "sudo apt-get install "
> > yourself? Is it feasible to have at least some of the sid chroots
> > allow this? Alternatively, how abo
Hi,
I have another "wishful thinking" idea for build machines to float.
Suppose I get a bug report saying my package has failed to build on
architecture glooble. I don't personally have a globle machine. To
debug the problem, I need to fire up www.debian.org/devel, find the
link to the list of
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 09:59:42PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 12:09:12AM -0500, David Starner wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 09:28:02PM -0500, Rahul Jain wrote:
> > > Unless you care about performace. Which is the main reason to use
> > > different packages for each C
Howdy,
The boost libraries have excellent documentation in HTML format.
Unfortunately, there is no "make install" equivalent to copy the files
into a nice place. Nor is it as simple as "cp -a docs ..." as the
files are intermixed with the source code. But there is a top-level
"index.htm" file,
Hello,
A new version (1.35) of the Boost library collection was released
yesterday. I'd like to get it packaged for Debian ASAP. The question
is: whether to simply replace the existing version (1.34.1) as we have
always done, or to have the old and new both available in the library?
In the past
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 07:38:14PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 05:22:45PM +0000, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > A new version (1.35) of the Boost library collection was released
> > yesterday. I'd like to get it package
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 03:13:15PM -0400, Joshua Judson Rosen wrote:
> Samuel Tardieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Package: boost
> > Severity: wishlist
>
> > Boost 1.35 has been released and contains great enhancements. Could you
> > please update the Debian package?
>
> Seconded--I've bee
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:20:39PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> I think new and separate boost-1.35 package is the best option we have:
>
> 1. It may be uploaded now and released with lenny without touching
> any reverse dependency
> 2. Never more huge transitions, reverse dependencies
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 10:53:35PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>> If we do decide to have co-installable -dev packages, the next
>> question is how do we handle the current non-versioned includes and
>> link libraries? Do we follow what gcc and p
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 03:43:35PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:20:39PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
>
> > I think new and separate boost-1.35 package is the best option we have:
> >
> > 1. It may be uploaded now and released wit
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 01:14:45PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:22:24AM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> >
> > In contrast, the alternative strategy of having all the libfoo-dev
> > (1.34.1) packages conflict with libfoo1.35.0-dev packages
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 06:16:04PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 12:15:39AM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > My headache now is that there are 13 -dev packages in Boost. One
> > (libboost1.35-dev) contains 60+ header-only libraries, while the
> >
Hi,
I need some help packaging Tcl language bindings for ITK [1]. I've
read the policy (in package tcl-doc) but I'm not sure whether
I'm doing the right thing.
I am essentially tcl illiterate, so please explain things in full.
Examples help.
ITK generates about 9 shared libs and 4 .tcl files, i
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 03:08:02AM +0200, Meike Reichle wrote:
> -
> The Debian Project http://www.debian.org/
> Debian adopts time-based release freezes pr...@debian.org
> J
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 03:31:57PM +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 03:08:02AM +0200, Meike Reichle wrote:
> >> Debian decides to adopt time-based release freezes
> >
> > I believe this is a
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'd appreciate someone to help with maintenance of geomview.
The package description is:
Geomview is interactive geometry software which is
particularly appropriate for mathematics research and education.
In particular, geomview can display things in hyperbo
Hi,
I agree with Charles: this is unncessary, unproductive busy-work.
On the other hand, Section 10.4 says only "the script name should not
include an extension". So you can leave the extension for
compatibility with the rest of the world. It is a bug, but Section
1.1 says:
Non-conformance w
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 03:48:06PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Discussed in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/05/msg01173.html
There's not a lot of discussion there -- just an announcement really.
> With glibc-2.5 and gcc-4.1.2 (and gcc-4.2), the 'long double'
> data type did change
Hi,
How do I debug this situation: ipe won't install, yet I have the
dependencies that "apt-get install" complains about.
Below, you will see that my attempt to install libipe1c2a claims to
have three unmet dependencies. However, as you see by "dpkg --list",
I *do* have these three packages at
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 08:40:31PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 10:03:16PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
> > How do I debug this situation: ipe won't install, yet I have the
> > dependencies that "apt-get install&q
Hi,
The Policy Manual [1] gives the following recipe for supporting
parallel make:
ifneq (,$(filter parallel=%,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
NUMJOBS = $(patsubst parallel=%,%,$(filter parallel=%,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
MAKEFLAGS += -j$(NUMJOBS)
endif
Unfortunately, for packages that use recursive m
Hi,
The buildd log pages, e.g. [1], used to be sorted by package version
(or maybe build date). However that is no longer the case.
Can this be fixed? The current situation is less than useful since
the latest build is buried in other output.
Thanks,
-Steve
[1] http://buildd.debian.org/build.
I have two systems. Both track unstable, and have package
locales at version 2.0.16.
On one system, package locales owns /etc/default/locale, on the other,
it doesn't. Should the file be owned by locales or not?
Could the situation arise by upgrades? One system is 4 years old
(upgraded weekl
Hi,
Is there a canonical list of symbols defined by each of the
Debian architectures, e.g. do I test for Sparc using
__sparc or __sparc__ ? How about m68k, hppa, etc?
My first guess was that would be contained on http://ports.debian.org/
but no such luck.
Thanks,
-Steve
signature.asc
Descri
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 08:04:46PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
> * Steve M. Robbins [Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:42:06 -0500]:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > The buildd log pages, e.g. [1], used to be sorted by package version
> > (or maybe build date). However that is no longer the cas
Hello,
Is the NEW queue going to get processed any time soon? There's a load
of packages that are 3 weeks or more old.
Thanks,
-S
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
I need some guidance from library packaging gurus.
Libsoqt is a library that is currently linked with Qt3. I've had a
request to rebuild it with Qt4 instead (#415382) which can be done by
simply changing the configuration.
Can I simply upload the reconfigured shared library package, which
**NOTE** **NOTE** **NOTE** **NOTE** **NOTE** **NOTE** **NOTE**
The boost library short name has changed semantics in Debian. Prior
to 1.34.0-1, the short name was multi-threaded. Now it is single
threaded.
**NOTE** **NOTE** **NOTE** **NOTE** **NOTE** **NOTE** **NOTE**
Hello,
A new versio
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 04:59:37PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:50:56AM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> >
> > Git repos are not relevant here.
>
> they are fucking important, but it seems that the firewire
> lib maintainers are quite
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 10:28:27AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> "Steve M. Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 11:18:24PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> >> I don't think it makes sense to include in common-licenses something
&g
Upstream released a new GMP version 5.0.0 with a scary-sounding
caveat:
The 5.0.0 release contain a very large amount of new code, and
countless improvements to existing code, please see below for the
complete list. No past GMP release has contained more new code
than 5.0.0. Most
Hi,
The "links" box of the PTS used to have a link to the experimental
buildd logs. I think I used it last week but today it is not
there; c.f. http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gmp.html
How can I see the logs?
Thanks,
-Steve
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Paul,
I read through the links you provided. There was a cogent argument
against using flags to symbolize a language. I would accept that.
However, while I understand your argument about losing contributors,
I'm not completely convinced that using a flag chosen by country X to
represent country
I'm a little alarmed at the attitude that "no one cares about static
linking" so that it's okay to drop the .a files. Likely relatively
few people care, but there are some that do.
One example is scientific users that need to ensure reproducibility of
computer experiments [1] over many years: one
Folks,
The package "aptitude" is priority "important" and depends on
libboost-iostreams, which is "optional". This is a violation of
Policy section 2.5.
The request of Bug #588608 is to raise the priority of
libboost-iostreams to "important". Reading Policy, I note that
"important" means:
Hi,
The discussion surrounding why aptitude is priority 'important' [1] is
very enlightening. Thanks to all contributors.
With respect to the priority of libboost-iostreams, the consensus
seems to be to raise it.
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 02:18:52AM +0200, Steve Langasek wrote:
> [ ... ] on ba
Hi,
The insighttoolkit package is a large and active code base. They use
a system of nightly build/test on a variety of machines [1] to ensure
that the code works on all supported platforms.
I run a build on my amd64 machine -- configured as the Debian ITK
packages -- to expose issues early.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Steve M. Robbins"
* Package name: insightapplications
Version : 3.20.0
Upstream Author : The Insight Consortium and Contributors
* URL : http://itk.org/ITK/resources/applications.html
* License : BSD (http://w
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Steve M. Robbins"
* Package name: mriconvert
Version : 2.0
Upstream Author : Jolinda Smith joli...@uoregon.edu
* URL : http://lcni.uoregon.edu/~jolinda/MRIConvert/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
D
pbuilder itself or a third
package. Has anyone else seen/solved this?
Thanks,
-Steve
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 02:24:51PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Package: ca-certificates-java
> Version: 20100412
> Severity: important
>
> I routinely build insighttoolkit using pbuilder. Ins
More information ...
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 02:54:22PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > failed (VM used: java-6-openjdk).
> > dpkg: error processing ca-certificates-java (--configure):
> > subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
> >
Hi,
I was working on gmp and insighttoolkit packages today and ran into
two new behaviours of svn-buildpackage that are very annoying. I
checked the obvious candidates that I could think of
(svn-buildpackage, pbuilder, dpkg, devscripts) but didn't see any
recent changelog messages that appear ala
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:25:50PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got the same issue with ca-certficates-java and pbuilder, but after
> re-create base.tgz, it has gone away. Could you try to do that, please?
Thanks for the tip! Indeed, re-creating base.tgz using "pbuilder
--create" di
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 04:49:04AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Squeeze Release
> ===
>
> The monthly RFH section is once more for the Squeeze Release. Trying to
> read Release Team minds, I get something like: ? the RC bug count [1] is
> proceedings in the right direction,
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 09:34:02PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 14:26:39 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
> > So I looked at [2], clicked through to the Universal Debian Database
> > [3], selected Sort By "last modified", and clicked Search
Hi,
I just received notice (bug 603579) that upgrade lenny to squeeze will
break if a boost package containing an "rtupdate" script is installed.
In stable there are four such packages:
libboost-python-dev
libboost-dbg
libboost-python1.35-dev
libboost1.35-dbg
The issue is that the rtupd
The list of RC squeeze bugs in the UDD http://udd.debian.org/bugs.cgi
is growing alarmingly. However, I found one that doesn't seem like
it belongs there so I'd like to ask what to do about it.
Bug #557495 describes an undeclared conflict between packages:
libctapimkt0-dev/1.0.1-1
libtowit
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Steve M. Robbins"
* Package name: elastix
Version : 4.4
Upstream Author : Stefan Klein and Marius Staring
* URL : http://elastix.isi.uu.nl/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C++
Description : toolbox
Hi,
This release update announced:
As hinted in the previous release update, now is the time to
decide exactly what is going in to squeeze and what isn't. Here's
what we're going to propose regarding the remaining RC bugs.
We'll be working against the list of RC bugs affecting S
Hi,
I've recently adopted a package (nyquist) that only builds in 32-bit
mode. I'm struggling with supporting it on amd64 and other 64-bit
architectures in Debian.
First: yes, clearly the code should be migrated to 64-bits. Upstream
is aware of that and it's a nontrivial effort. I'm interested
Hi,
The Debian build of ITK 3.20.0 fails to build on the powerpc
build daemon [1] with the diagnostic:
[ 23%] Building CXX object
Wrapping/WrapITK/Modules/Base/CMakeFiles/_BasePython.dir/wrap_itkImageToImageFilterBPython.o
cd
/build/buildd-insighttoolkit_3.20.0-6-powerpc-m2NGDH/insighttoolkit-
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 10:15:12AM +0100, Ga?tan Lehmann wrote:
>
> Steve, Luis,
>
> Splitting ImageToImageFilterB into smaller modules seems to be the
> way to go in ITK v3. The attached patch should help!
Thanks, Gaetan! I'm building ITK with this patch now for upload
to Debian so we'll know
Hi,
Suddenly, I can't apply my quilt patches:
steve@riemann{insighttoolkit-3.20.0}quilt push -a
Applying patch metaio-test-vtk_source.patch
patch: unrecognized option '--unified-reject-files'
patch: Try `patch --help' for more information.
Patch metaio-test-vtk_source.patch does not app
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 03:53:34AM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 20:17:35 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
> > Suddenly, I can't apply my quilt patches:
> >
> > steve@riemann{insighttoolkit-3.20.0}quilt push -a
> > Applying patch metai
I uploaded insighttoolkit the other day, but the buildd machines
refuse to build it, claiming an installability problem [1]:
insighttoolkit/alpha dependency installability problem:
insighttoolkit (= 3.20.0-8) build-depends on one of:
- python-vtk (= 5.4.2-8)
This is repeated for all ar
tags 604479 + help
thanks
The Debian Qt/KDE team is planning to remove the KDE3 and Qt3
libraries from Debian shortly. The package kseg uses Qt3 presently
and needs to be modified to build with Qt4.
I'm not actively using kseg and don't have time to spend modifying
it. I'm looking for someone t
Hi,
The buildd system is generally quite fabulous, but why does
https://buildd.debian.org/build.cgi?pkg=insighttoolkit show version
3.8.0-1? This version is neither sid, not stable, nor oldstable.
Thanks,
-Steve
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
I'm cc-ing to debian-devel since I expect others are wondering about
the Boost status.
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 05:43:11PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> 1.42 still appears to be the latest version available in Debian (unstable).
> Could 1.46.1 be uploaded?
I assume you're
Just wanted to mention another approach that avoids guessing at which
files need to be touched and in what order. This is what I use in
debian/rules when I need to modify automake source files:
# Suppress accidental execution of the auto-* tools; see
# http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/de
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: mpfr
Version : 2.0.3
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.mpfr.org
* License : LGPL
Description : C library for multiple-precision floating-point
computations with exact rounding
The main
Hi,
One of my packages (libboost-dev) has a lot of documentation as HTML
files, complete with inlined graphics and the like. However, these
files are all mixed in with the source code.
I need a maintainable way to get a list of these files.
There must be some tool that will parse a set of html
Hello,
I'd like to solicit opinions about what to do with
imlib-linked-against-libpng3.
Until August 2002, the Debian imlib packages were linked with libpng2.
Even after libpng3 was released in early 2002, imlib remained linked
with the older libpng2. This was done to retain the ABI of imlib,
es
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 07:53:50PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 08:43:45PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > What would be the best way to accomodate such a request? I can
> > imagine introducing a new package of imlib linked with libpng3. But
> >
Hi,
Chris Cheney asks
So gnome doesn't use imlib (in Debian at least it seems to), or
did I somehow miss why it appears RedHat only has one version of
imlib, which is the version compiled against libpng12?
Red Hat hacked gdk-imlib so that libraries loaded as "modules"
(like png) do N
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 01:03:03PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> Since it is in non-us, at least for now that means it will not appear on a
> official debian cd.
When I burned the 2.2r2 iso's last December, there was both a
"crippled" and a "non-us" ISO for the first CD ("binary-i386-1").
Hi,
I've recently adopted the isapnptools package. This package is most
useful for 2.2 kernels. However, one of the bug reports (#71007) has
a proposal for making it useful with the 2.4 kernel.
In kernel 2.4, ISA PnP configuration can be done using the kernel.
When enabled, this kernel option p
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 09:27:20AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Steve M. Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > To complicate matters, the configuration logic may be compiled as a
> > kernel module, meaning the module needs to be loaded before cards
> > may be conf
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 10:27:59AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 07:52:38PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> >
> > What is already handled by modutils? Loading the isa-pnp module?
> > Configuring the PnP cards?
>
> Sorry, I wasn't talking a
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 06:15:41PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 07:48:07PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> > I can keep this up just as long as you can.
>
> Everyone around here knows that I just love this game.
Children!
> In any case, your script is still broken. I'm o
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 03:38:06PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> Hello,
>
> during the latest debate on the BTS, I thought of a new feature
> which would be really useful in the BTS.
>
> Instead of the maintainer sending a message to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] saying "this is not a bug" (which only
> serves
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 07:34:31AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Steve M. Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It is likely that the folks who wrote autoconf did not invent this
> > idiom for setting and re-setting $IFS. They probably borrowed the
> > idea from exi
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 05:31:34PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On May 02, Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >(*) I really hate it when people close bugs with a one-liner (or less)
> >answer, without any substantiating motivation. Especially when parts of
> That's fair. I have when peop
Hi,
No response from -user, here's hoping someone on -devel can
shed some light.
I have HTML-ized documentation for a code library that contains links
to the actual header files. Clicking on the link is supposed to show
the contents of the "fool.h" file, for example.
However, instead of display
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 02:58:59PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 02:20:15PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> >
> > WTF? It's *text*, after all. What magic spell is needed to convince
> > navigator to put it into the main window like a "foo.tx
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 11:09:20AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> The point here is to make packages start moving to Build-Dep'ing on
> kernel-headers-* packages. The question is, how to allow them to do that
> easily.
>
> IMO, we can use alternatives. And it should be fairly easy
>
> update-altern
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 12:39:48PM -0700, David Whedon wrote:
> Sat, May 05, 2001 at 08:43:30PM +0200 wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am maintaing the Debian package puzzle and have a problem
> > with the new upstream version. The package and program has been
> > renamed by upstream to tree-puzzle, be
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 10:00:14PM +0200, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> maybe it is a stupid question, but can debian packages be installed in other
> places than / ?
It is not a stupid question, IMHO.
Unfortunately, I believe the answer is "not in general". One of the
problems is that
Hi Christian & Dale,
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 11:11:14PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> "DS" == Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> DS> I can be convinced on either count. How would you feel about my presenting
> DS> this issue to the "developers" at large, with you an
Hi,
A couple days after first installing debian a couple years back, I
managed to mess up the passwd file in some way. I was very pleasantly
surprised to find a backup version of the file on-line in /var/backups.
I was quickly able to un-do whatever it was that I did.
There are also backups of d
Hey Guys,
I think Anthony mistyped the bug# here. This has nothing to do
with gdk-imlib1.
Cheers,
-Steve
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 11:44:01PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> severity 110892 wishlist
> thanks
>
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 02:42:23PM +0200, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> > # On Sun, 2 Sep 2
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 09:23:53AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 13-Sep-01, 18:37 (CDT), Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Debconf question: do you want a symlink.
>
> Please, no. The fact that debconf provides an easy, consistent way to
> interact with the user does not mean
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 02:10:22PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 02:07:36PM +0200, Jochen Voss wrote:
> > there used to be a package called "dput",
> > but now I cannot find it anymore. For example
> > visiting
> >
> > http://packages.debian.org/dput
> >
> > shows t
On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 08:28:57AM -0700, Bill Wohler wrote:
> If a multi-billion dollar company whose employees have all learned
> British English decide that their documentation should be in
> American English, that's saying something.
It says that they feel Americans are too provincial.
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 09:17:01AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 08:06:33PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Jan 2002 21:36:24 +1100
> > Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > My question still remains. If we require a big recompile, when/ how are
> > > we
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 05:48:53PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Jan 2002, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> > and have created one (See 127215). From my perspective the problem
> > seems to be the libpng3 changes the dependencies of qt2 and hense kde.
> > It seems the fix is not to r
Folks,
We're going to have a whole new round of complaints and such if
the broken packages get into testing.
It seems to me that we should have high-severity open bugs on these
packages to prevent them from getting into testing before it is sorted
out.
Do the new maintainers of libqt and KDE
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 03:46:12PM +0100, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> is an Debian internal project to support tasks of people in medical care.
> Debian-Med will have two main components: Support for general practice and
> laboratory research.
In the "research" category -- how about medical imaging?
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 11:11:49PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
>
> > > How do you plan to prevent programs that link with libqt2 to also link
> > > with libpng3 ? Manual check ?
> >
> > yes manual check
>
>
> How about libqt2-dev confli
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 03:21:34AM -0800, Philippe Troin wrote:
> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 10:07:13AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > > Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> > >
> > > > > It's only the -dev package, which is only
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 03:23:25PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
> >> "SMR" == Steve M Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 03:09:08PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> I really
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 04:37:17PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
> >> "SMR" == Steve M Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > The fact remains that we cannot change the linkage of the library
> > NOR of applications piecemeal. The c
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 06:30:56PM +, James Troup wrote:
> Package: ax25-apps
> Version: 0.0.5-5
> Severity: serious
>
> Patrick Ouellette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Anyone else have this problem? Is it a "feature" or a bug?
>
> It's a bug in your package.
>
> | [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 05:09:41PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
> >> "SMR" == Steve M Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 04:37:17PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> See Colin's answer. C
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 01:07:26PM -0200, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> On 09 Jan 2002 15:09:08 +0100
> Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Now, the question is: should GNOME move to libpng3, and how? The QT/KDE
> > > folks have sidestepped the problem by declaring that libqt2
Hello,
On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 05:15:37PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> Having all those $*dir's done by automake and autoconf is all fine, but
> how does the program know at runtime what the user entered as argument
> to configure? Say, the program has some datafiles it needs in
> $datadir/progr
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
