I have two systems. Both track unstable, and have package locales at version 2.0.16.
On one system, package locales owns /etc/default/locale, on the other, it doesn't. Should the file be owned by locales or not? Could the situation arise by upgrades? One system is 4 years old (upgraded weekly or better), the other just two months old. Surely it isn't architecture dependent (one is x86, the second is amd64)? SYSTEM 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] --list locales Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Cfg-files/Unpacked/Failed-cfg/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Description +++-=============================-=============================-========================================================================== ii locales 2.7-16 GNU C Library: National Language (locale) data [support] [EMAIL PROTECTED] --search /etc/default/locale locales: /etc/default/locale SYSTEM 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] --list locales Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Cfg-files/Unpacked/Failed-cfg/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Description +++-=============================-=============================-========================================================================== ii locales 2.7-16 GNU C Library: National Language (locale) data [support] [EMAIL PROTECTED] --search /etc/default/locale dpkg: /etc/default/locale not found. -Steve
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
