Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Stephen M. Webb"
* Package name: libgrip
Version : 0.3.6
Upstream Author : Canonical Ltd.
* URL : https://launchpad.net/libgrip
* License : LGPL v2.1, LGPL v3
Programming Lang: C
Description : multitou
your build system is probably already broken and needs to get fixed first.
--
Stephen M. Webb
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
the long-anticipated libsdl2 packages,
so at least I know someone is intending to
package them. It may not be Policy to require closing a bug when putting a
package on the NEW queue, but it's
established documented practice. After all, isn't that one of the purposes of
filing a bug a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Stephen M. Webb"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: utouch-evemu
Version : 1.0.8
Upstream Author : Canonical Ltd.
* URL : https://launchpad.net/utouch-evemu
* License : GPL-3
P
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Stephen M. Webb"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: utouch-frame
Version : 2.2.1
Upstream Author : Canonical Ltd.
* URL : https:launchpad.net/utouch-frame
* License : GPL-3+
P
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Stephen M. Webb"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: utouch-grail
Version : 3.0.2
Upstream Author : Canonical Ltd.
* URL : https://launchpad.net/utouch-grail
* License : GPL-3+
P
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Stephen M. Webb"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: utouch-geis
Version : 2.2.6
Upstream Author : Canonical Ltd.
* URL : https://launchpad.net/utouch-geis
* License : LGPL-3+
P
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Stephen M. Webb"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: xorg-gtest
Version : 0.7.0
Upstream Author : Peter Hutterer
* URL : http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/test/xorg-gtest/
* License
dware, is that true?
I can't say with absolute certainty because of the myriad patches and versions
floating around, but squeeze *should*
support the required multi-touch driver in-kernel and definitely has the XI2.2
protocol in the x.org server. It should
just work.
--
Stephen M. Webb
nization who will allow v2 but not v3 because of the tivoizaton
and patent clauses. A developer may want
his work to be used by such organizations as well as by Debian.
--
Stephen M. Webb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe
On 12/28/2013 04:15 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 04:11:18PM -0500, Stephen M. Webb wrote:
>> On 12/28/2013 03:53 PM, Clint Adams wrote:
>>> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 09:45:09AM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
>>>> As one of the "GPL v2 only"
clients' lawyers state unequivocally that they will not
accept GPLv2+ software, but GPLv2-only
is completely acceptable. This is not an isolated incident.
As a corollary, that may also be why the company that employs me insists on
GPLv3-only licensing by default.
--
Stephen M
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Stephen M. Webb"
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: no-dice
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Stephen M. Webb
* URL : http://www.sf.net/projec
13 matches
Mail list logo
