On 06/11/2013 04:34 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > Normally you would keep the old version's changelog. But even if you don't, > there's no need for an ITP in cases like this, or when part of a package > starts > to be shipped from a different source upstream. It's like opening an ITP for > every upstream release. You can still do it but people are going to complain > if > it starts to happen very often...
Perhaps what is not clear is that there is no old version. The SDL2 family of libraries is not a new version of the SDL family of libraries so much as a new set of incompatible libraries serving the same purpose, from the same people. There is no common code base and the libraries are one hundred percent parallel-installable. You can't use the old changelog, there isn't one. I for one appreciate seeing an ITP for the long-anticipated libsdl2 packages, so at least I know someone is intending to package them. It may not be Policy to require closing a bug when putting a package on the NEW queue, but it's established documented practice. After all, isn't that one of the purposes of filing a bug against WNPP? -- Stephen M. Webb <stephen.w...@bregmasoft.ca>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
