Hello,
plink has just made it to the archive.
Teodor happened to have nicely explained my objections to rename plink.
Dear Colin, if you don't mind too much, or if you could be bribed with a
few beers, please be so kind to rename the plink binary package.
Many thanks and best regards,
Steffen
Charles Plessy schrieb:
> Le Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 09:32:42AM +0200, Teodor a écrit :
>
>> I still believe it is best to rename 'plink' to 'puttylink' in
>> putty-tools binary package. Anyway, this should be fixed for squeeze
>> since in lenny there is no conflict (plink is not included in lenny)
Hello,
Teodor schrieb:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Steffen Möller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Charles Plessy schrieb:
>>
>>> Le Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 09:32:42AM +0200, Teodor a écrit :
>>>
>>>> I still believe it
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Steffen Möller"
* Package name: libjpedal-jbig2-java
* URL : http://www.jpedal.org/support_JBIG.php
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Java
Description : library for accessing large images
The JPedal JBIG2 Image
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Steffen Möller"
* Package name: libiscwt-java
Version : 5.2
* URL :
http://opensource.intarsys.de/home/en/index.php?n=IsCWT.HomePage
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Java
Description : abstr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Steffen Möller"
* Package name: libisnativec-java
Version : 5.2
* URL :
http://opensource.intarsys.de/home/en/index.php?n=OpenSource.IsCWT
* License : BSD-like
Programming Lang: Java
Description : helpe
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Steffen Möller"
* Package name: nordugrid-arc
Version : 0.8.1
* URL : http://www.nordugrid.org/
* License : Apache
Programming Lang: C++
Description : middleware for shared storage and computation
The
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Steffen Möller"
* Package name: librt-java
Version : 4.7
* URL :
http://opensource.intarsys.de/home/en/index.php?n=JPodRenderer.DevelopersGuide
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: Java
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Steffen Möller"
* Package name: libisfreetype-java
Version : 5.2
* URL :
http://opensource.intarsys.de/home/en/index.php?n=IsFreeType.Download
* License : custom free
Programming Lang: Java
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Steffen Möller"
* Package name: libmath-interpolator-perl
Version : 0.0.3
Upstream Author : Andrew Main (Zefram)
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Math-Interpolator/
* License : GPL or Artistic
Progra
Hello,
On 05/23/2010 03:44 PM, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Darren Salt wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> Working fine here on i386, whether booting a stock kernel (testing with
>> 2.6.33 from experimental) or a custom kernel. I've not checked a stock kernel
>> on amd64 for some time now, but I've seen no problem
Hello,
On 06/27/2010 04:25 PM, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> Seeing as though upstream Firefox 3.6 released December 1, 2008, and
> upstream Thunderbird 3.1 released just a couple days ago, it might be
> high time to get xulrunner 1.9.2 into Sid, as both Iceweasel 3.6 and
> Icedove 3.1 will depend on it.
On 07/21/2010 09:12 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> If you ask me, the decreasing number of popcons is because people are
> bored by a system with old versions of programs and are seeking for
> alternatives and we will see a further decrease until Squeeze will be
> released. So probably the best idea t
This should probably then move to Debian-Project?
On 07/21/2010 11:31 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 05:34:27PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
>
>> I think that what we need is Debian Blends that include official backports.
>> This, no other distribution proposes yet.
>>
> I wrote:
>> * Metaphorical speaking: we should give Debian a phone number. And I
>> mean full-time or at least half-time employees. With so many people
>> unemployed these days, I even feel we have the duty to think about
>> creating jobs.
>>
>
On 07/21/2010 03:46 PM, Stephen Powell wrot
Hello,
after reading through this long thread, I find many somewhat diverging
opinions, but not a single posting I could not at least partially agree
to. This includes Lucas with "we should not include Debian money", while
I hope we could somehow have him agreeing to a separate account from
which
On 07/22/2010 03:21 PM, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> I reckon a forum would be much easier to finance (even with
> moderators) than a phone line. It could probably be integrated with
> one of the mailing lists which would go a long way to make it look
> friendlier.
+1 there are various Debian support
Hello,
On 07/23/2010 02:03 AM, Jesús M. Navarro wrote:
> On Thursday 22 July 2010 23:51:10 Don Armstrong wrote:
> [...]
>> Testing's primary purpose is as a staging ground for the next release;
>> while it'd be nice to try to keep it working as a fully installable
>> version all of the time, progre
On 07/23/2010 01:56 PM, Mike Bird wrote:
> On Fri July 23 2010 00:41:12 Neil Williams wrote:
>
>> Critical bugs cannot be ignored and buggy packages cannot be left in the
>> archive to trip up someone else
>>
> For people who are relying on the package and are not affected by the
> critical
On 08/26/2010 11:20 PM, Thomas Weber wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 07:42:07AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> I don't see what a discussion on -devel@ would bring. We are unlikely to
>> come up with a better choice of solutions than what we already have
>> (keep it on by default, revert the cha
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. Juli 2014 um 09:50 Uhr
> Von: "Sylvestre Ledru"
> An: "Matthias Klose" , "Emmanuel Bourg" ,
> "Debian Java"
> Cc: "debian-devel@lists.debian.org" , "Debian
> Release"
> Betreff: Re: Java 9 dropping support for source/target level 1.5
>
> On 15/07/2014 23:55, Matthia
Hi Charles,
> after unsubscribing from debian-vote, I had a bit of a thought about
> debian-devel, which is hard to follow now, and suddenly I saw something very
> clear. This year's freeze seems of an excellent quality and promises to be
> brief. Is that thanks to debian-devel ? Not much. Ex
Hello,
I prepared a package for BOINC (http://boinc.berkeley.edu) with all the
dependencies for owners of CUDA-savvy NVidia cards to help
installing the libraries. Since many scientific applications with BOINC only
have 32bit binaries, there are extra dependencies for
the amd64 platform on the r
Hello,
Von: "Steve McIntyre"
An: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Betreff: Re: DPA instead of PPA
In article <518b7cf6.3080...@debian.org> you write:
>>On 09/05/13 07:38, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>>> bikeshed \o/
>>
>>You probably meant this to be a comment on the discussion rather than a
>>suggested
Hello,
The European Space Agency comes up with another run of its Summer of Code
http://sophia.estec.esa.int/socis2013/?q=timeline
and at least little me would like to see Debian to participate. "We" are
already on the Space Station, after all. And we had at least one DD on
it, too.
I am not su
Hi,
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 09:37:54AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > Le Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 02:06:26PM +0200, Niels Thykier a écrit :
> > >
> > > Our automated tools for finding RC buggy leaf packages in testing have
> > > found 79 potential candidates (see attached files).
> > >
> > > The p
I am less critical about it - it just should remain outside Debian. We would
gain a deb-store, I presume. The ties should be more with the respective
program's developers than with us the Debian community. After all, the money
would flow because of the functionality, not because of the availabil
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. Juni 2013 um 14:21 Uhr
> Von: "Paul Tagliamonte"
> An: "Alexandre Rebert"
> Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Betreff: Re: Reporting 1.2K crashes
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 01:28:10AM -0400, Alexandre Rebert wrote:
> > I am a security researcher at Carnegie Mellon
Dear list,
I just sponsored a package that built nicely locally with g++ 6.4.2-5 on
amd64 but fails on the platforms listed in the subject line:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ball&suite=sid
which gives plenty of repeats of
.. /source/DATATYPE/hashGrid.C:23:3: error: narrow
Hello,
> That being said: becoming a DD would be ok for me, but would it be ok with
> the project as well? The scope of my work would be rather limited, I think...
We have non-programming DDs
http://www.debian.org/News/2010/20101019
http://www.debian.org/vote/2010/vote_002
which is not exactly
Hello,
>
> > (what, am I the only old grump who's not attracted to game playing?)
>
> I'm attracted to game playing. But not to offers of software on non-free
> terms, regardless of price.
I suggest to halt thinking about game playing. What about game producing?
Tech aspect:
To have Debian-
Dear kfreebsd users,
amd64 is fine, but i386 does not build the BOINC package. The only other
platofrm making difficulties is hurd, but this is something very
different and will most likely be already fixed with the next upload.
On kfreebsd
https://buildd.debian.org/build.cgi?pkg=boinc;ver=6.12.1
Hello,
On 04/03/2011 06:15 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:51:02AM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
>
>> Time based freezes
>> --
>>
I very much agree that with an increasing complexity
of our distribution that goes together with an increasing
heteroge
Hello,
Marc laid that wonderful bait in this thread to which then Stefano
bite, and then the thread ended after some clarification by Marc
where IMHO there was no clarification needed [not shown].
On 04/30/2011 12:28 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 11:28:17AM +0200, Marc '
On 07/26/2011 09:53 AM, Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
> Le 26/07/2011 09:28, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
>> On 26/07/11 at 00:27 +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I believe it's high time we start to providing Debian in form of
>>> official
>>> virtualisation images. In contrast to the ISOs curren
Hello,
On 07/26/2011 11:08 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:27:09AM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
>> I believe it's high time we start to providing Debian in form of official
>> virtualisation images
> Yes, absolutely. These days having virtual images is yet another way
Hello,
it seems like OpenCL is becoming routine. The -dev files are luckily
shared between many architectures from what I understood, just the
libraries/drivers are platform specific. The NVidia maintainers have
http://packages.debian.org/sid/nvidia-opencl-icd
in our distribution. For AMD/AT
Hello,
with more people using Debian on phones and SSDs, the size
of packages keeps being an issue. And some claim that there
would not be much difference of current distros to all the
overhead that Redmond brings.
Are we monitoring any sudden in- or decrease in disk
space per package or "per tas
On 09/05/2011 10:13 PM, Bill Allombert wrote:
>> Le samedi 03 septembre 2011 à 11:54 +0200, Bill Allombert a écrit :
>>> Today circular dependencies in unstable reached an all-time low, with
>>> only 40 circular dependencies.
>>
>> I think it should now be clear that there aren’t any such issues t
Hello,
I am Laszlo's sponsor.
On 09/28/2011 05:01 PM, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 at 16:38:11 +0200, Laszlo Kajan wrote:
>> Without the funding received based on the usage statistics you contribute by
>> installing this package none of the packages on Debian could have been made
>
Hello,
at times I now find pointers to Patron (https://www.patreon.com),
Flattr (https://flattr.com/) et al.
(https://alternativeto.net/software/patreon/) in the READMEs of a
software I am about to package. Is this something that should be
referenced in debian/upstream/metadata? Anything sp
Hello,
When packaging, it typically happens that there is the tool you really
want to package and a set of build dependencies that you package with it
because they are build dependencies. So, after lots of packaging,
packaging, packaging, you eventually get the package of interest to
build and t
Hello,
Running Debian unstable, I failed to set up OpenCL to work with BOINC
and an AMD RX580. The card worked just fine with the monitor, but it was
not recognised as an OpenCL device by BOINC. When I then tried to
install the 19.10 release of the driver AMD provides on
https://www.amd.com/en/su
On 17.06.19 22:16, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
Am 17.06.19 um 21:15 schrieb PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel:
Same here... with WXX100 cards.
what about rocm packaging ?
(I'm not using an AMD graphic card but ...)
there was recently a new article added to the Debian wiki regarding this
topic about using
Hello,
On an project-internal mailing list the thread "Conda vs Debian"
evolved. Sam kindly reminded us to discuss this publicly. So, here you
go, issues raised were
* interaction with industry-standard non-free software
+ Intel compilers and libraries
+ NVidia drivers and libraries
in 2016 we have more pedantic compiler settings and more CI -
and LTO, as much as compilers have improved on that, does not need to be
applied everywhere. Any change in opinion?
Steffen
On 30.03.16 17:22, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Steffen Möller writes ("-flto to become more of a routine - an
Hi Mo,
Would you mind creating a wiki.d.o page that collects your insights? Or
shall I start and you fill in the gaps?
Best,
Steffen
On 26.08.19 04:04, Mo Zhou wrote:
Hi -devel,
I've just filed an RM(#935769) bug against src:tensorflow and I believe
this is the most appropriate choice at thi
I agree that our network of trusted developers can help beyond development, and
maybe it should in this early onset of a deglobalisation, but this one may
affect our security. The company's URL is https://www.hataphar.com.vn/, nothing
like hpharm in Mali.
$ host hpharm.ml
hpharm.ml mail is hand
Dear Zebb,
Thank you for your kind offer to help. Debian technical documentation somewhere may already have an answer to your question. I admit not to have checked. But if you would please check that and find that info missing, then please then send a diff to the authors of that document or a p
Am 26.01.21 um 16:59 schrieb Christoph Biedl:
> Julien Cristau wrote...
>
>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:34:14PM +0100, Stephan Lachnit wrote:
>>> * Package name: root
>> [...]
>>> I want to maintain ROOT in the science team. ROOT was already in Debian as
>>> `root-system` [1], but hasn't been
Am 05.02.21 um 18:50 schrieb Geert Stappers:
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 04:21:42PM +, Paul Sutton wrote:
>> Would it be possible to make it easier to find the ISO for the next release
> It is work in progress and the process is called "Doing a release".
The reply was kind of funny but please
On 11.08.21 08:46, Marc Haber wrote:
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 01:09:29 -0400, Calum McConnell
wrote:
On Wed, 2021-08-11 at 00:51 +, Paul Wise wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 5:38 PM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
"So, Arch Linux, one of the main reasons, there's a couple, but the
main
reason is t
Hello,
When CI fails, I get an email and can chase things up with a look at the
output files. This is something I like a lot. As a user, though,
especially for scientific packages I would want to see the files that
have been created. This way I could confirm that, e.g., the generated
PDFs have us
On 15.04.22 15:53, M. Zhou wrote:
On Fri, 2022-04-15 at 14:24 +0200, Luca Boccassi wrote:
I think this will also improve newcomer's contributing experience.
This proposal is also filed at
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/grow-your-ideas/-/issues/34
What about doing something even simpler - rat
Hello,
On 29.09.19 20:16, Sean Whitton wrote:
Here are the significant normative changes from the previously announced
release of Policy (4.4.0):
5.6.26
A package control file must not have more than one ``Vcs-``
field.
where type != "browser"?
If the package is maintained in m
Hello,
I think your dispute goes down to the question if Debian's community
infrastructure should preferably using software packaged for Debian
(which salsa is doing) with the binaries Debian offers (which salsa is
not doing). I find this interesting. The two positions are
A) No idea why this sh
Hello,
I am mostly a the periphery of Debian for Debian Med, but at times this
makes me add build dependencies that are of interest for everyone. Like,
basic packages for nim. :o) Whenever we go out to the world we keep
stressing that Debian Med is not separate from Debian at all. It is just
the
Hello,
I just skimmed through https://trends.debian.net/ and am impressed. Many
thanks for these figures. Do you accept wishes for additional graphs?
Mine would be on the number of build dependencies as a scale for
software complexity and how this evolved over time. My hunch is that
later softwa
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller
* Package name: python-bx
Version : 0.7.2
* URL : https://github.com/bxlab/bx-python
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : library to manage genomic data and its aligment
python-bx
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller
* Package name: python-bd2k
* URL : https://github.com/BD2KGenomics/bd2k-python-lib
* License : Apache
Programming Lang: Python
Description : general utility library for bd2k python package
The package is a 2
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller
* Package name: toil
Version : 3.5.0~alpha
* URL : https://github.com/BD2KGenomics/toil
* License : Apache
Programming Lang: Python
Description : cross-platform workflow engine
The package will be m
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller
* Package name : pluto-jpl-eph
Upstream Author : Bill Gray
* URL : https://github.com/Bill-Gray/jpl_eph
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: C++
Description : command line handling of JPL ephemeres data
The
On 3/3/18 7:54 AM, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
On Fri, 2018-03-02 at 22:05 -0600, Steve Robbins wrote:
I assume that the reason my packages have been processed is due to one
of two reasons: a) I get quoted on LWN several times a year, so I'm a
celebrity and get special treatment
I expect that's it.
On 3/26/18 10:29 PM, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 10:18:18PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 03/16/2018 07:51 PM, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
I have to pick a nit here - I know this mail probably comes from a template
and you are repeating what used to be true here. But, according to G
Hello,
not only for files newly created but also for changes done to the end of
a file, there is no terminal \n.
Knowing that I will now just go and add an extra empty line at the
bottom of the text/source code files edited, but, well, maybe there is a
bit more UNIXish solution to that?
Ch
Hi,
the Debian derivative KNOPPIX comes with a boot option "adriane" that
may help you. An English page I found on
https://www.dedoimedo.com/computers/knoppix-adriane.html which is a bit
old (2009). The latest version with the Ariadne boot parameter is
described and downloadable on
http://w
On 7/22/18 2:50 AM, Wookey wrote:
> On 2018-07-21 12:54 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 01:34:19PM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
>>> I refuse to judge the matter with my feelings.
>> Rationality has a place, but so do feelings.
>>
>> The names in this package are offensive
Hello,
On 8/15/18 12:30 PM, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Dear Andreas,
>
> Quoting Andreas Jakowidis :
>> Because of a long experience in developing Debian-Software since the
>> year
>> 1995 it would be
>> important/necessary for everyone if you could offer Debian also as a
>> mobile
>> solution
>>
On 8/15/18 1:53 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 7:35 PM, Steffen Möller wrote:
>
>> https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianFSO may be worth a look. I mean, we
>> once had the complete stack in Debian. I do not think that work
>> transitioned to salsa.
> The
On 8/16/18 5:24 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 12:31 AM, Steffen Möller wrote:
>
>> Would it make sense to join the
>> https://docs.automotivelinux.org/docs/getting_started/en/dev/reference/homescreen/index.html
>> crowd?
> Automotive and mobile are q
Hello,
On 09.09.18 02:11, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Paride Legovini writes:
>
>> However, there are clearly cases where renaming binaries makes several
>> people unhappy (most likely: the package maintainers, upstream, people
>> writing scripts, users of different distributions), while not making a
>
On 16/05/2017 07:07, Mechtilde wrote:
> these two questions come into my mind: > > What does a "newcomer" expect from
> such a website? > what do we
expect from a newcomer? > > To go from user to dev is a gliding
way. > > "Want To Become Debian Developer" is the last step for a dev
not the
Hello,
There is a fairly new trend out there, best represented by brew.sh and
conda.io, to have user-installable packages. These come very handy in
HPC-near environments or other shared resources that do not grant root
access. In computational biology it is bioconda that is attracting many
users.
On 25.07.17 12:04, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Simon McVittie:
>
>> On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 at 12:28:04 +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
>>> And quite some packages in our
>>> distribution do not really need to be installed as root if they were
>>> installed wher
On 29.07.17 17:41, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Steffen Möller wrote:
>
>> If flatpak is an answer - great. But from what I get, there is no automated
>> transformation from .deb to it, so we would need to decide for packaging
>> in that differe
On 29.07.17 17:51, Jeff wrote:
> On 29/07/17 17:26, Steffen Möller wrote: >> The HPC community does not want
> to need root privileges to get their
>> software installed/used on the HPC setup. This excludes regular >>
Debian packages, traditional containers like Docker
Hi Benda,
On 30.07.17 09:37, Benda Xu wrote:
> Hi Steffen,
>
> Steffen Möller writes:
>
>> I just had a quick look and it seems really nice, indeed! Thank you tons for
>> pointing that out to us. Has anybody already tried that with Debian?
> I am one of a few guys b
On 30.07.17 13:47, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jul 2017 at 19:34:42 +0900, Benda Xu wrote:
>> As far as I can see, the easiest relocations are those modifiable in a
>> plain text, like configuration file, script shebang, etc. The medium
>> ones are ELF, with which we have tools like patch
On 18.08.17 09:33, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 14768 March 1977, Philip Hands wrote:
>>> ...Well, in keeping with the Toy Story theme, FTW Masters is
>>> worshipped by the Squeezes (packages alien to the archive) and at the
>>> time of a "Win" a package new to the archive is selected as for the
>>>
Hello,
Because of ever-more complicated workflows in computational biology,
researchers combine more and more tools within a project and people
start getting confused over what (flavour of) tool has been involved in
an analysis when exchanging worklows or when skimming through notes of
an analysis
Hello,
my QA page or our blend's task page (like
https://blends.debian.org/med/tasks/bio-ngs) regularly informs me about
updates that should be performed to packages I alone maintain or (more
likely) with the help of my blend. The updates are often (but now
always, admittedly) easy to do.
I would
Dear all,
On 15.11.17 16:43, Steffen Möller wrote:
> [question about how to realise auto-updated packages]
>
Thank you tons for all your nice and constructive ideas, experiences and
comments.
My (biased) impression is that there is a majority in favour of some
automation to become an opti
Hi Jeremy,
On 18.11.17 01:12, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Steffen Möller
> wrote:
>> If the positive vibes I have felt are kept up then I propose the
>> individuals running relevant services in/around Debian (ftpmasters, web,
>> backports,
On 15/01/16 09:33, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 01/14/2016 10:11 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 09:35:31AM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>>> For running a local set of meta packages I would like to
>>> express package dependencies depending upon other packages
>>> installed,
Hello,
I admit to be a fan of link time optimisation and would like to see this
challenge promoted towards more of a routine challenge to establish for
our packages. I found this informative thread
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/06/msg00181.html
that in particular sees the challenge
On 06/04/16 21:19, Wookey wrote:
>> > .. perhaps be more aggressive in
>> > removing software that's no longer useful and just lies in the archive
>> > dormant.
> The fact that Debian has a lot of software is a genuine benefit. Just
> because stuff is old, does not mean it is no longer useful. Th
Package: wnpp
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Owner: Steffen Moeller
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: qtpyvcp
Version : 5.0.2
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Framework for LinuxCNC virtual control panels
QtPyVCP is a Qt and Pyth
87 matches
Mail list logo
