Soren Stoutner:
After reading a number of comments to the email below, I thought I would
provide a bit of context for this email and Phil’s excellent work on Mentors.
Recently Phil has taken it upon himself to triage every package that requests
sponsorship on mentors.debian.net. Here is an exam
Simon McVittie:
On Fri, 02 Aug 2024 at 16:40:15 +0900, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
[...]
* decide on a directory name (`./debian/export_artifacts/`?)
* the build process will dump any files that could be interesting to
export in there (no decision if/how to define the structure within
t
Simon McVittie:
On Fri, 02 Aug 2024 at 18:17:52 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
Simon McVittie:
In the design that I prototyped, it's declarative, loosely inspired by
the equivalent Gitlab-CI feature:
- the maintainer can write patterns into debian/build-artifacts for
package-specific q
Fabio Fantoni:
Il 05/08/2024 03:14, Andrey Rakhmatullin ha scritto:
[...]
Thanks for reply, what I mean is precisely a standard field that points
to a file, inside the package or even an url as already explained can be
very useful in most cases) that contains all the useful information for
c
Helmut Grohne:
Hi fellow developers,
(modified resend, as first attempt didn't arrive)
please allow me to open a can of worms. Package removal from unstable.
Deciding when it is time to remove a package from unstable is difficult.
There may be users still and it is unclear whether keeping the p
Jonas Smedegaard:
[...]
DEP5 already encourages (but does not require) use of SPDX shortnames,
except where Debian and SPDX disagree on sensible naming.
See https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/#spdx
and the historical notes at
https://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/Copy
Charles Plessy wrote:
> Dear David,
>
> In 2005 you started an effort to close old WNPP bugs that do not get resolved:
> http://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/1127503245.4308.5.ca...@cerdita
>
> Apparently, this was stopped in 2008. Can you confirm that it is intentional
> or
> did it just get un
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Niels Thykier
* Package name: eclipse-rse
Version : 3.1
Upstream Author : DSDP TM Development Team
* URL : http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm/
* License : Eclipse Public License Version 1.0 ("EPL")
Programming
Charles Plessy wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> It was proposed in 2009 to formalise "Team uploads" in analogy to the "QA
> uploads", as a special case of NMU, where most conventions are relaxed.
>
> http://lists.debian.org/e13a36b30904052052g73850787vcc8b2035640d7...@mail.gmail.com
>
> While there was in
Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> Hi Charles,
>
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 10:40:47PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> Are there other persons interested? Shall I go ahead and submit a patch to
>> Lintian and the Developers Reference (plus perhaps the Policy to include a
>> footnote containing the special cha
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 31 mars 2010 à 08:18 +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
>>> I agree. dpkg-dev should not be depending on any VCS and it should not
>>> promote any particular VCS either. I know that git is the new black (oh,
>>> wait, that was something else), but I personally d
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 02:03:09PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>>[...]
>> In the general case, switching is a small effort for sure, but in the case
>> pointed out by Neil (he won't convert packages with no patches because he
>> doesn't see the benefit) the effort is almos
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.8.4.0
Severity: wishlist
Justification: Policy §3.6
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
As of today[1], the Java Policy retired the use of the virtual packages
mentioned
in the subject line, which brings
Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
> If I hit a bug in a v1 source package I often do
>
> apt-get source foo
> cd foo-*
> DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="noopt debug nostrip" dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc
> sudo debi ../foo*.changes
>
> and then run the program inside M-x gdb RET of emacs. If I want to
> test
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On May 05, Vincent Danjean wrote:
>
>> the bugs in applications. I would find very strange if we release sqeeze
>> with a broken sun's java (even if it is non-free) and no good replacement.
> Me too, but I still hope that it could be fixed.
> Maybe the maintainer could provi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Niels Thykier
Owner: Niels Thykier
* Package name: eclipse-mylyn
Version : 3.2.1
* URL : http://www.eclipse.org/mylyn
* License : EPL v1.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Task support for Eclipse
Mylyn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2010-08-08 15:45, Zvi Dubitzky wrote:
> I need to generate a Debian package for a library
> As an exercise I tried it with libvirt .
> I am running a Ubuntu 8.10 . and use the libvirt.0.6.1 tar.gz
>
Hi,
Thanks for your interest in Debian,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2010-09-27 20:40, Josh Kelley wrote:
> I'm trying turn an Eclipse CDT (C/C++ Developer Tools) managed build project
> into a Debian package and am having a lot of trouble. Since it's a managed
> build project, I can't simply run make. Eclipse ca
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Niels Thykier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: eclipse-jgit
Version : 0.9.3
Upstream Author : Eclipse Development Team
* URL : http://eclipse.org/jgit/
* License : BSD-like
Programming
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-01-14 22:22, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On ven., 2011-01-14 at 18:05 -0200, Marco Silva wrote:
>> This documentation is generated automatically
>> from the source code, using a documentation generator called haddock.
>> Haddock
>> is part o
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Niels Thykier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: lpg-generator-java
Version : 2.0.20
Upstream Author : Philippe Charles
* URL : http://lpg.sourceforge.net/
* License : EPL-1.0
Programming
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-03-15 23:55, Neil Williams wrote:
> Using autotools with Debian native packages can be a real PITA and
> source format 3.0 just gets it wrong mostly. Most other tools also get
> it wrong, even svn-buildpackage. If I knew how to fix it reliabl
On 2014-07-09 18:51, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> short notice from my side... (defacto / so far libjpeg-turbo package
> maintainer)...
>
> I can start working on the libjpeg-turbo transition at the beginning of
> August. First step is, I guess, providing libjpeg-turbo with libjpeg
> compat
On 2014-10-01 16:04, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> Hi, I uploaded a new version of dash (0.5.8-1) to experimental, please
> help testing it. If no critical issues arise, I plan to put this
> version into unstable in about two weeks.
>
> Regards, Gerrit.
>
>
Hi,
Have you tried rebuilding the archive wi
On 2014-10-13 13:12, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Package: general
>
> Before systemd arrived, it was possible to have a chroot free from
> init packages (not needed to build packages).
>
> [...]
>
> In either case, the end result is that I'm forced to install init
> packages in a chroot which is used
On 2014-11-03 11:23, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> [...]
> I'm planning on starting to file bug reports for the source packages
> below (BCCed). I've not checked (yet) how severe the dpkg-statoverride
> ones are, but if most of them do not get fixed, I might consider
> reintroducing the compat sy
On 2014-11-08 18:06, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 11:56:49PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>> The release team is pleased to announce that Debian 8.0 "Jessie" is frozen.
>> Further updates to this release will be restricted to bug fixes only.
> ...
>
> I thought usually
On 2012-04-18 08:06, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Package: libept1.4.12
> Version: 1.0.6.1
> Severity: Important
>
> Hi Oliver, hi Enrico, hi all,
>
Hi,
I am closing this bug #669203 as not a bug, because ...
> On Di 17 Apr 2012 17:29:53 CEST olivier sallou wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> libept1 depends on l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
We are considering removing the following packages from testing as they
have unfixed RC bugs filed against them. The packages can be found in
the attached dd-list. The bugs that put them on this list can be found
in the removals.txt file (also
On 2012-05-14 21:16, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> I'm very confused about what the status is regarding udeb and
> data.tar.xz. Are they allowed or not? It seems at the moment that
> dh_builddeb is creating them by default, and lintian is complaining that
> this is an error.
>
> I've done a search thro
On 2012-05-14 22:01, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 09:51:43PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>
>> Lintian is outdated (#664600) and the fix has been commited to the git
>> repository[1]
>
> I saw a bug report requesting that packages that failed the l
On 2012-07-17 19:35, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> [...]
>
> It would also be quite interesting, although much harder to determine,
> whether there are any scenarios where such a dependency would result in a
> non-free package being installed by default. If, for example, there's a
> depen
On 2012-07-28 11:41, Jose Antonio wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been checking the website of "Release-critical bugs status" at
> http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/debian/all.html. And I have several
> questions:
>
> * I have installed Wheezy but not Sid nor Squeeze: Can I filter the bugs to
> f
On 2012-09-20 18:52, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2012-09-18 09:30, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> Just to give a short impression what we can find here:
>
>> guile-1.6-dev_1.6.8-10.1
>> /usr/lib/libguile-ltdl.la
>> /usr/lib/libguile.la
>> /usr/lib/libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-1.la
>> /usr/lib/l
On 2012-09-20 21:03, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2012-09-20 18:52, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> On 2012-09-18 09:30, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>>> Just to give a short impression what we can find here:
>>
>>> guile-1.6-dev_1.6.8-10.1
>>> /usr/lib/libguile-ltd
Hi,
Our automated tools for finding RC buggy leaf packages in testing have
found 79 potential candidates (see attached files).
The packages have been selected based on the following criteria:
* The package had at least one RC bug without activity for the past
14 days.
* If a bug is assigned
On 2013-06-10 09:29, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jun 2013 17:07:09 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>
>> Le 7 juin 2013 09:28, "Atsuhito Kohda" a
>> écrit :
>>>
>>> Yes, but it looks to me there is not practical information.
>>
>> Did you see the wiki?
>
> Sorry for late reply.
> If you mea
On 2013-06-30 17:30, Dave Steele wrote:
> [...]
Thanks for working on improving Debian.
> Debian Orbital Alignment Team
> eclipse-platform-data : eclipse
>
> /usr/lib/eclipse/plugins/org.apache.ant_1.8.3.v20120321-1730/lib/ant-apache-resolver.jar
Looks like a false positive for thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
We are considering removing the following packages from testing as
they have unfixed RC bugs filed against them. The packages can be
found in the attached dd-list.
The packages have been selected based on the following criteria:
- The package ha
On 2013-07-01 09:05, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> #678383 [pixelmed]: pixelmed: FTBFS with Java7 (uses internal Java API)
>
> Would it be possible to filter out (in the future?) any bugs that are
> marked as pending ? I
On 2013-07-01 08:21, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks a lot for this work.
>
> On 30/06/13 at 23:32 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> We are considering removing the following packages from testing as
>> they have unfixed RC bugs filed against them. The pack
I have just activated 77 removal hints - attached is a dd-list of the
packages with a removal hint now. The list was filtered by rechecking
the severity and whether the bug still affected sid by using UDD (with a
hanful of them was manually checked as well).
Should your package still be listed de
On 2013-07-08 01:34, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 01:10:51AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>
>> Andreas Tille
>>camitk (U)
>
> A fixed version is since two days in
>http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
>
>
>
On 2013-08-12 04:18, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 02:51:52AM +0200, Adam Borowski a écrit :
>>
>> I would like to propose full UTF-8 support. I don't mean here full
>> support for all of Unicode's finer points, merely complete eradication of
>> mojibake.
>
> Hi Adam,
>
Hi,
>
On 2013-08-23 19:17, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Introducing dgit - git integration with the Debian
> archive"):
> ...
>> If I have understood you, dgit won't work properly if you make the
>> "wrong" kind of change, so I need to either have this fixed, or (more
>> likely) to work
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
As we announced in [LAST-BITS], we would like to get a better idea of
that status of the ports, to make an informed decision about which
port can be released with jessie. One of the steps is to get an
overview of which of the porters are (still
On 2013-09-06 15:02, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Thanks for your explanations!
>
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 02:39:09PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>> As this suite is much smaller than the full archive, updating it can be
>> done with much less overhead and is done with every cron.unchecked
>> run. P
On 2013-09-16 10:38, Enrico Tassi wrote:
> Hello, is checking for the environment variable ADTTMP the recommended
> way to test if a test is being run by adt-run? It seems to work, but
> I'd like to know if there is a better way or not.
>
> I've many packages with a decent "test" target already,
On 2013-09-01 09:33, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As we announced in [LAST-BITS], we would like to get a better idea of
> that status of the ports, to make an informed decision about which
> port can be released with jessie. One of the steps is to get an
> overview of which
On 2013-09-25 11:38, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> > 3. Renaming tcl-dev and tk-dev into libtcl-dev and libtk-dev. Since
>> > too many packages have versioned build-dependencies on tcl-dev or
>> > tk-dev, I chose to retain tcl-dev and tk-dev packages (as
>> > meta-packages which depend on libtcl-dev an
On 2013-09-03 13:49, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 05:09:22PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> How you can help (NEW-TEST-HELP)
>>
>>
>> Add tests to your packages. The full specification for these
>> tests
On 2013-09-30 17:33, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
>> Niels Thykier wrote:
>>> [KEY-PACKAGES]
>>> http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/key_packages.yaml.cgi
>>
>> If you're curious, as I was, how this list is
On 2013-09-30 20:38, Eric Dorland wrote:
> * Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) wrote:
>> Cyril Brulebois writes:
>>> Julian Taylor (2013-09-30):
>>
At minimum the packages using Werror should be test rebuilt before each
new upload:
http://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=AM_INIT_AUTOMAK
Hi,
The final results are in:
Summary table:
Arch || DDs || NMs/DMs || Other || Total
---++-++-++---++--
armel || 3 || 0 || 1 ||4
armhf || 3 || 1 || 2 ||6
hurd-i386 || 5 || 0 || 3 ||8
Hi,
This is a friendly reminder. If you are listed below, then the listed
packages of yours will be automatically removed from testing within 15
days. The "first batch" of automatic removals will happen in about 8
days.
Please remember that "fixing" your RC bug(s) can sometimes be as
simple as
On 2013-10-06 13:09, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06/10/13 08:52, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>kfreebsd-8: bugs 720470,717959,720476, flagged for removal in 14.7 days
>
> Not sure why that's appearing in this list because:
> 1. the package was removed from te
On 2013-10-08 00:04, Bill Allombert wrote:
> [...]
>
> So while it is possible that the _maintainer_ is not needing a friendly
> remainder, other interested third-party might.
>
> Cheers,
> Bill.
>
>
Hi,
I, genuinely, hope that these removals-warnings will make people fix
bugs pro-actively ra
On 2013-10-13 19:24, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
Hi,
> First of all, thanks a lot for planning this well in advance. Much
> appreciated. This changes a lot compared to what happened in NYC! :)
>
You are welcome, :)
> On 10/13/2013 11:01 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
On 2013-10-13 19:41, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> We are happy to announce that we will freeze Jessie at 23:59 UTC on the 5th
>> of November 2014.
>
> thanks for annoucing that early and for your work!
>
You are welcome. :)
>> [...] * Proactive automated removals 3 months into the freeze.
On 2013-10-13 17:01, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
> Freeze date and Freeze Policy for Jessie
>
>
> We are happy to announce that we will freeze Jessie at 23:59 UTC on
> the 5th of November 2014.
>
> To avoid any confusion around exactl
On 2013-10-15 15:35, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
> [sorry for the late reply I was on vac]
>
Hi,
No worries.
> On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 09:52:17AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>
>> Andreas Tille
>>gdpc: bugs 713652, flagged for removal in 8
On 2013-10-19 16:38, Jeremiah C. Foster wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 05:01:31PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
> [snip freeze policy]
>
Hi,
I s/-arm/-ports/'ed the CC, since I figured the rest of the porters
would find the answer equally interesting.
&g
On 2013-10-29 16:05, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Niels Thykier writes ("Bits from the Release Team (Jessie freeze info)"):
>> Results of porter roll-call
>> ===
> ...
>> Summary table:
>> Arch
On 2013-10-30 07:19, James Lukash wrote:
> Hello all. I received a message about my ITP bug:
> ===
>> block 727532 by 727618
> Bug #727532 [wnpp] ITP: lin-guider -- Astronomical autoguiding program
> 727532 was not blocked by any bugs.
> 727532 was not blocking any bugs.
> Added blocking bug(s) of
On 2013-10-29 17:48, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Niels Thykier writes ("Re: Bits from the Release Team (Jessie freeze info)"):
>> [...]
>> As mentioned we are debating whether the "5 DDs" requirement still makes
>> sense. Would you say that we should abolish the
On 2013-11-03 15:49, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Niels Thykier dixit:
>
>> [...]
>> Until we have a clear definition of "actively maintained ports", I would
>> recommend porters to err on the side of being verbose over being silent.
>
> I’ve held off on the
On 2013-11-03 16:54, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2013-11-03 15:49, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>> > Niels Thykier dixit:
>> >
>>> >> [...]
>>> >> Until we have a clear definition of "actively maintained ports", I would
>>> >
On 2013-11-03 16:03, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 03/11/13 10:54, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Come to think of it; maybe we should have a BTS page for each of the
>> ports (e.g. a pseudo package in the BTS).
>
> We've had this on kfreebsd, due it to having been
On 2013-11-03 23:04, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 11:54:34AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> [...]
>
>> I suppose a "sponsor-only" DD could be sufficient, provided that the
>> sponsor knows the porters well enough to be willing to sign off on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-09-14 00:38, Kees Cook wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a release goal of enabling hardening build flags[1]
> for all C/C++ packages in the archive[2]. For Wheezy, specific sub-goals are
> being chosen.
>
> The default flags are alm
On 2011-10-30 10:26, Sébastien Riccio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know much where to write about this, but i'll try here. Sorry if
> it's the wrong place!
>
> I updated a squeeze box to unstable/experimental in order to try out the
> xapi (project kronos) port on Debian, but got into this on my test
severity 645793 normal
reassign 645793 wnpp
retitle 645793 O: lprfax - Utility to allow printing to a fax modem
thanks
Hi,
I am orphaning lprfax[1] on behalf of Camm Maguire (see #645793).
Due to its RC bugs and its very low popcon I intend to request the
removal of this package in about 14 day
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I would like to propose the goal of getting archive-wide support for
the optional debian/rules targets "build-arch" and "build-indep".
The intention is to finally solve issues like #619284 and the goal
is related to #629385.
According to Linti
On 2011-11-05 21:22, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose the goal of getting archive-wide support for
> the optional debian/rules targets "build-arch" and "build-indep".
> The intention is to finally solve issues like #61928
reassign 555034 wnpp
retitle 555034 O: mlview - xml editor for GNOME environment
thanks
Hi,
I am hereby orphaning mlview[1] on behalf of Sebastian Bacher. As it is
RC buggy and has a very low popcon, I intend to RM within 14 days unless
someone picks it up.
~Niels
[1]
Package: mlview
Version
On 2011-11-16 11:14, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Niels Thykier writes:
>
>> On 2011-11-05 21:22, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I would like to propose the goal of getting archive-wide support for
>>> the optional debian/rules
reassign 648933 wnpp
retitle 648933 O: emile -- the Early Mac Image LoadEr
severity 648933 normal
thanks
I am here by orphaning emile on behalf of the maintainers. The
description of emile is:
"""
the Early Mac Image LoadEr
EMILE provides a way to natively boot Macintosh computers which normal
reassign 648645 wnpp
retitle 648645 O: genesis -- general-purpose neural simulator
severity 648645 normal
thanks
I am hereby orphaning genesis on behalf of its maintainer. The
description of genesis is:
"""
general-purpose neural simulator
GENESIS is a general purpose simulation platform which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
We are considering removing the following packages from testing as
they have unfixed RC bugs filed against them. The packages can be
found in the attached dd-list (or at [0]).
The packages have been selected based on the following criteria:
- The
On 2012-01-26 02:45, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Luk Claes wrote:
>> On 01/25/2012 01:24 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>>
>>> We are considering removing the following packages from testing as
>>> they have unfixed RC bugs filed against the
On 2012-02-09 13:20, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I have just received a review by a l10n team of a package of mine.
>
> The reviewer seems to be under the impression that there is something
> wrong with the computer speaking to the user in the first person. For
> example:
>
>> [...]
I suspect devref 6
On 2012-02-14 07:43, Russ Allbery wrote:
> [...]
>
> * Lintian should recognize arch-qualified override files, and multiarch:
> same packages must arch-qualify their override files. debhelper
> assistance is desired for this.
>
> [...]
I have no problem with Lintian accepting arch-qualified
On 2012-10-03 11:01, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> [...]
>
> But then either all build infrastructure (and also lintian) don't use
> debian/control, or all these tools tolerate that blank line (with the
> exception
> of pbuilder).
>
> Best,
> Michael
>
Lintian's parser ignores empty lines before
On 2012-10-03 12:02, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
>> On 2012-10-03 11:01, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> But then either all build infrastructure (and also lintian) don't use
>>> debian/control, or all these tools tolerate that blank line (with the
>>> exception
>>> of pbuilder).
>>>
>>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
We are considering removing the following packages from testing as
they have unfixed RC bugs filed against them. The packages can be
found in the attached dd-list. The bugs that put them on this list
can be found in the removals file (also at
On 2012-10-19 17:43, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:32:39AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> We are considering removing the following packages from testing as
>> they have unfixed RC bugs filed against them. The packages can be
>> found in the attached dd
On 2012-10-18 10:32, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> [...]
>
> If the relevant RC bugs in the affected packages are not dealt with
> /before/ Friday the 26th of Oct., the packages will be removed from
> testing. Note that "dealt with" may also include downgr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
We are considering removing the following packages from testing as
they have unfixed RC bugs filed against them. The packages can be
found in the attached dd-list. The bugs that put them on this list
can be found in the removals file (also atta
On 2012-10-28 18:47, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 12:37:38PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> ax25-apps, fabric, firmware-crystalhd, icewm-themes, ilisp, inguma,
>> lustre, mingw-ocaml, noflushd, openvas-plugins-dfsg, php-crypt-gpg,
>> phpgacl, python-
On 2012-10-30 14:32, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [...]
>
> If the relevant RC bugs in the affected packages are not dealt with
> /before/ Wednesday the 7th of Nov.[1], the packages will be removed
> from testing. Note that "dealt with" may also include downgradi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
We are considering removing the following packages from testing as
they have unfixed RC bugs filed against them. The packages can be
found in the attached dd-list. The bugs that put them on this list
can be found in the removals file (also atta
On 2012-11-15 00:15, Emmanuel Bouthenot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:02:10PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> [...]
>
>> Should you need a bit more time than given, please do not hesitate to
>> contact us. It is also easier for us if we can avoid having
On 2012-11-14 22:02, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are considering removing the following packages from testing as
> they have unfixed RC bugs filed against them. [...]
>
ferm, apt-2p2 and mediawiki-math has been fixed in sid and by the looks
of it all of them are al
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
We are considering removing the following packages from testing as
they have unfixed RC bugs filed against them. The packages can be
found in the attached dd-list. The bugs that put them on this list
can be found in the removals file (also atta
On 2012-11-30 12:55, Niels Thykier wrote:
> [...]
>
While slightly overdue; the results were 0 removals! \o/
>
> --8<-- removals.txt --8<--
> # #668740/#668740
> remove dsc-statistics/201203250530-1
>
Downgraded.
> # #692623
> remove fossil/1:1.22.1-1
>
On 2012-12-18 16:01, Simon Kainz wrote:
> So whats the point in having multiple versions of the same source package?
> I'm really interested in the background if this issue.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Regards,
>
> Simon
Besides build failures (as suggested by Roland and Stuart), there is
also
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
We are considering removing the following packages from testing as
they have unfixed RC bugs filed against them. The packages can be
found in the attached dd-list. The bugs that put them on this list
can be found in the removals file (also atta
On 2013-01-24 15:47, Niels Thykier wrote:
> [...]
> # #697402
> remove bzr-gtk/0.103.0+bzr792-3
>
Reassigned to python and downgraded.
> # #694642
> remove glpi/0.83.31-1
>
Fixed in sid and downgraded.
> # #696816
> remove jenkins/1.447.2+dfsg-2
>
Fixed
On 2013-02-18 13:08, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> [...]
>> OpenJDK6 therefore should be considered obsolete when Wheezy is released.
>
> I wouldn't use the word 'obsolete' so long as there are packages that
> *can* use it... I'd call it 'maintenance only'.
>
>
> Before deciding the post-wheezy f
On 2013-02-27 13:39, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 27.02.2013 00:50, Chris Knadle wrote:
>> When this was brought up in the bug report, the response was
>> "network-manager
>> can be installed, then disabled", but how to do that wasn't documented
>> anywhere in the network-manager package. Instead
1 - 100 of 384 matches
Mail list logo
