On 2011-11-16 11:14, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net> writes: > >> On 2011-11-05 21:22, Niels Thykier wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I would like to propose the goal of getting archive-wide support for >>> the optional debian/rules targets "build-arch" and "build-indep". >>> The intention is to finally solve issues like #619284 and the goal >>> is related to #629385. >>> >>> [...] >>> >>> To keep it attainable, the goal for Wheezy is to fix the subset of >>> packages that would need to differentiate "build" and >>> "build-arch"/"build-indep". Once we have the data available, we >>> will put up a dd-list for the reduced set. >>> >>> [...] >> >> The reduced set is available thanks to some UDD queries. We are looking >> at ~500 packages (see attached dd-list if some of your packages are there). >> >> The data is also available from[1], where you can also see the queries I >> used to generate this set (see reduced-set.py). >> >> >> Thanks for considering, >> ~Niels >> >> [1] http://people.debian.org/~nthykier/rg-build-arch-target/ > > Have you considered (or already written) a lintian check for those > targets? > > MfG > Goswin > >
Hi, Beyond the existing debian-rules-missing-recommended-target, I did write the patch in #647227. ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ec38f4e.1020...@thykier.net
