Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>If it comes down to "the driver, on its own, would not be acceptable for
>main because it is not functional; but as a practical matter, we allow
>it aggregated with the rest of the kernel because splitting individual
>drivers into contrib is a pain for everyone involved
Goswin von Brederlow wrote: (and it really was him this time -- sorry about
last time; hand-quoting is tricky stuff):
>Is the pseudo source file enough for BSD or Artistic license?
It's enough for BSD. (Which doesn't actually require source.)
>On the same subject but going in a totally differen
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathanael Nerode) writes:
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
^^
This is wrong. Glenn Maynard?
If it comes down to "the driver, on its own, would not be acceptable for
main because it is not functional; but as a practical m
Bas Zoetokouw wrote:
>I do actually use it, so unless anyone else wants to take it, I'd be
>happy to take it over.
I don't think I'm ready to "take it over" alone at this point, but I also use
it heavily and would like to help work on it.
Nathanael Nerode
ple need to be assigned the power to do these
jobs. Branden?
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This space intentionally left blank.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>
>>From time to time, someone announces an intention to package some tiny
> script or program, and people suggest including it in some other
> package instead to avoid pollution of the archive with lots of tiny
> packages. Although I understand the reasoning and the issues
Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> Who does a developer have to fuck around here to get his key deleted?
Same one he has to fuck to get a new key added, presumably.
It's a pity the DPL hasn't anointed a less-busy person with authority to
alter the keyring.
--
ksig --random|
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Blrgh!
OK. So I was working on the problem of fixing dpkg-dev so that
foo Depends: foo-data {SourceVersion}, foo-libs {BinaryVersion}
or something similar actually works. By parsing the version numbers.
Now it's apparently been changed under our noses, in such a way that my
proposed
sch
ll. The alternative possibility
is of course that each of these packages generated the bad recursive list
on its own, which is just as likely. I'm wondering where to file the bugs.
:-)
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A thousand reasons. http://www.thousandreasons.org/
Lies, theft,
not seem to trust James' opinion on this, but why
>do you not trust our beloved Release Manager, either, who said he knew
>of no serious issues with buildd maintenance right now?
Why should either of them know, to be perfectly frank? This is argument by
authority, not an actual arg
requested updates.
Indeed, complaining on debian-devel appears to get results, doesn't it?
At least, that's the conclusion that a rational outside observer would come
to. If that's an inaccurate conclusion, it indicates that there's something
seriously wrong in the transpar
ry, I'm not the buildd admin".
Apologies for the thread-breaking, I'm reading on the web pages again. :-/
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Make sure your vote will count.
http://www.verifiedvoting.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
This is an omnibus reply. Sorry about the thread-breaking, but I'm on
yet *another* computer, and I can't seem
to find a mailer which respects the In-Reply-To headers from the web
pages or lets me add my own.
==
I would like to note that I have made a practical and *new* suggestion
for dealin
I license this message as if it were public domain; please copy it anywhere
it might help and edit it as needed.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A thousand reasons. http://www.thousandreasons.org/
Lies, theft, war, kidnapping, torture, rape, murder...
Get me out of this fascist nigh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I believe my package is affected by the issues stated by Steve,
> depending on libraries which I do not directly use. Most of them are
> probably pulled in through the QT library I am depending on. My package,
> packagesearch, uses qmake as a build tool. The linking comma
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> * Nathanael Nerode [Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:35:41 -0500]:
>
> > To work out which libraries you're linked to which you don't actually
need,
> > ldd -u is invaluable.
>
> This seems like not the case _at all_ to me (the "inva
>On Sun, 11 Dec 2005, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> Regenerating acinclude.m4, aclocal.m4, configure.in, and finally configure,
>> can be a pain in the neck. In some packages, it's done by
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>autoreconf ?
NO NO NO. That does not work for t
of the webpages. Cc:ing
debian-devel on the theory that publicizing such a request will prevent
duplicate requests.
--
Nathanael Nerode
neroden fastmail.fm
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, ftpmaster is getting efficient at the routine processing. Congrats!
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>> But it is not doing a great job with processing a few old uploads. I
>> consider it a problem that no decision have been taken on the few
>> really old uploads (xv
ffmpeg code is the only issue, then
it should *not* be delaying xvidcap. If it isn't, then Javier should
be told.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"(Instead, we front-load the flamewars and grudges in
the interest of efficiency.)" --Steve Lanagasek,
http://lists.d
he case of Christian Marillat (it's documented
neatly in the ITP bug trail), but you're clearly wrong in the case of Javier.
Javier has stated that he's just guessing why his package has been stalled
and that he really isn't sure.
I don't know about the others.
--
Nathanael Ner
did you find that url?
In a random mailing list message to debian-devel in one of these threads.
Not a great way to find information. :-P
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A thousand reasons. http://www.thousandreasons.org/
Lies, theft, war, kidnapping, torture, rape, murder...
Get m
the menu
>file lacked a longtitle that is used as hint in the Debian menu.)
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This space intentionally left blank.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
uploads to fix FTBFSes,
RC bugs, etc.)
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Make sure your vote will count.
http://www.verifiedvoting.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Amazing! ghc6 is now the top blocker for packages entering testing, and it's
only keeping 15 packages out of testing!
Hooray!
Now to fix those ~= 400 RC bugs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello! This is one of 5 RC bugs, apparently with no maintainer response.
Apparently the list which is listed as the maintainer is rejecting messages
(336752), which probably contributes to the problem. Hence the Cc: to
debian-devel.
This bug is trivial to fix, and because it prevents mesa fr
> It'll take me some time to find a new, and more appropriate home for
> apt-torrent.
The Debian archive ("experimental" distribution) would be a *very*
appropriate home.
It won't provide a testbed package seeder or place to download .torrent files,
but that can be done later (and by any numbe
In response to your request for replies to
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/05/msg00260.html:
>1. Most of the source packages in Ubuntu are inherited from Debian
> unchanged (example: tetex-base).
Then the *source* packages can legitimately use the same Maintainer: field.
If they are
Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Which would be totally pointless until dpkg itself is fixed to give
> > packagers an alternative to ${Source-Version}.
>
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> I thought we had a fix-strategy in place for addressing these cases.
> I'm sorry if we don't; then of course this strategy
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This has probably been covered ad nauseum, but where do we stand in
>respect to getting mplayer in Debian?
IIRC, the copyright issues were carefully worked out and solved after several
years, finally reaching the approval of debian-legal. At which point i
>I'd like to offer these three packages for adoption: x-symbol, xmix, and
oneko.
I'll take oneko if Joey Hess doesn't want it. (But frankly he'll probably do
a better job at maintaining it than me.) (On third thought, I'd be happy to
be a co-maintainer for it.)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How did bin-NMU numbers work for the old numbering scheme on native
> packages?
In a Complicated Way. Essentially, the debian revision and NMU revision were
filled in with 0s (which were, accordingly, not supposed to be used in normal
version numbers).
>What prohibit
aj@azure.humbug.org.au:
> MJ Ray's already done such a summary; it's rather trivially inadequate,
> due to the information its summarising being equally inadequate.
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/12/msg00901.html
So the summary amounts to "patents". Is that right? In other wo
Apologies to AJ and the ftpmasters. I found the *important* part of the
thread, which I'd apparently missed during December, in which the
ftpmasters...
drumroll
explain what would be needed for mplayer to go into Debian now, barring
finding additional problems.
Congrats Jeroen van Wolfella
ssue and therefore at least one
>reason is still true. So dont hope too much it will get through.
>
>--
>bye Joerg
>Die d??mmsten H??hne haben die dicksten Eier.
I read this as "remove MPEG encoding and it will go in." Don't you?
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Read it and weep.
http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Text_of_Gore_speech_0116.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Right?
Likewise xvidcap, I presume?
And rte, as was already stated? (And sorry for not giving credit to Joerg
there!)
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"(Instead, we front-load the flamewars and grudges in
the interest of efficiency.)" --Steve Lanagasek,
http://lists.debian
the Maintainer field the same, but
use NMU version numbers and add a "Changed-By:" field which is different, that
seems perfectly reasonable as well.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Read it and weep.
http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Text_of_Gore_speech_0116.html
--
Russ Allbery wrote:
> (Or is
> imake going away completely?)
Yep.
Imake is still being shipped for the benefit of third-party packages, but it
is not used by anything in Xorg 7.0 IIRC. Doing a quick check, I think very
few if any other packages in Debian use imake.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Here's a list of packages that install binaries into /usr/X11R6/bin and
> don't have lintian overrides for it. In spot checks, about a quarter of
> these packages use imake. And that's just the packages with binaries;
> there are a number of other packages that don't install
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] over a week
> ago, as described here:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/02/msg3.html
>
> so far not even a response telling me I'm in a queue.
> Is the procedure described above still the right one?
DAM is v
> > so far not even a response telling me I'm in a queue.
> > Is the procedure described above still the right one?
>
> DAM is very slow-moving these days. Probably they haven't looked at your
mail
> yet.
Um, just in case anyone was wondering, that wasn't intended as a criticism of
DAM -- I t
bts.turmzimmer.net just went nuts:
>Changes at Thu Feb 2 0:10:06 CET 2006:
(all but six RC bugs are supposedly "solved" simultaneously)
Obviously something broke. Perhaps the ldap interface to the BTS, since
packages.qa.debian.org is giving bogus results too.
--
Nathanael Ne
ore often than the rest of netbase. I
think this argues for putting them in a separate netbase-data package.
In fact, this would solve in a certain sense the long argument about how many
protocols/services to include in the lists: alternate packages could
Provides: netbase-data if they
I were a DD, just to get a clear vote on
the actual issue on the record.
Incidentally, if I ever become a DD, I *will* immediately propose a GR to
amend the Social Contract to explicitly allow unmodifiable license texts in
Debian, since it technically doesn't, but everyone agrees that
s*, this was a problem, though not a major one,
and that they would introduce a special license exception dual-licensing the
Doxygen comments.
To date, this has not been done, and it is still technically illegal to
generate that portion of the libstdc++ manual unless you're the FSF.
Blech.
ot; people have
not been willing or able to actually propose a GR which says what they
*mean*.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Theocracy, fascism, or absolute monarchy -- I don't care which it is, I don't
like it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This belongs somewhere else. Directing followups to -project.
Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 02:31:43AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > Incidentally, if I ever become a DD, I will immediately propose a GR to
> > amend the Social Contract to explicitly all
ecure, and fast. That sort of work is what I'm especially good at. I could
start an alioth project for "keyring-manangement-scripts" if anyone else is
interested in working on this.
Hmm, this is going off topic for -vote Replies to -devel please.
--
Nathanael Ner
esn't explain the packages listed up top.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bush admitted to violating FISA and said he was proud of it.
So why isn't he in prison yet?...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gt; Software Foundation raise funds for GNU development.''
>
> Ok, there are no invariant sections, but there is (a short) front and
> back cover text.
>
> How do we proceed with these documents?
They're non-free, per the GR. Cover Texts are unmodifiable material
eason my little brain didn't think of this. Mailing ftpmaster
with a Cc: to debian-devel was the obviously correct thing to do,
and I apologize for not doing it in the first place. For some reason my
brain didn't come up with that as a possibility. :-/
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL P
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Which doesn't? Minix maybe. Even ext2/3 has hashes for dir if you
> > format it that way.
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>
> Is this the Debian default for installation?
Yes, it is. I just checked and every install I've done turned this on wi
Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote:
> El Viernes 22 Abril 2005 14:37, Maciej Dems escribió:
>> I have a simple question concerning the GFDL discussion.
>>
>> Does the GFDL documentation which currently does not contain any
>> invariant section have to go to non-free as well?
Yes, until the GFDL is revi
Peter Samuelson wrote:
>In practice, 'extra' is mainly used when Policy forces you to use it:
>that is, if your package conflicts with another package which has
>priority optional or higher
The really sad part is that *this* isn't enforced; there are lots of
"optional" packages which conflict with
On 4 Jul 2005, at 11:44 am, Wookey wrote:
> Take a look at this patent (granted this week in europe)
>
> http://gauss.ffii.org/PatentView/EP1170667
>
> I'm fairly sure that apt-get and associated package-integratity
> checking tools could be considered infringing. (Does dpkg/apt have
> a modular
I suggested "Debian IV", to *really* get rid of minor version numbers,
permanently. Initial release would be Debian IV r0. Point releases would be
Debian IV r1, etc. Next release, Debian V, etc.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
nfig (or offers a similar tool), please fix it.
I will file occasional bugs as I spot them, but given the sheer number of
cases, I
thought a reminder to all Debian Developers was a better move. If you have
difficulty
fixing this for your package, I believe several people including me are happy
erhaps people could comment on other things like this which they've noticed
and we could get them into the next release notes, including anything which
wasn't
covered on previous major upgrades?
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[Insert famous quote here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
archival work I make CDs in DAO mode with cdrdao.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bush admitted to violating FISA and said he was proud of it.
So why isn't he in prison yet?...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
eople have such trouble understanding
this.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bush admitted to violating FISA and said he was proud of it.
So why isn't he in prison yet?...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sed on the features detected by autoconf.
I don't think I'd like to work without autoconf. The alternatives I've seen
are all hideous monstrosities. Automake -- well, if you know how to write
a Makefile, don't use it, just write your Makefile -- but most people
don't.
-
n.
> BTW. The application in question is this: http://tptest.sourceforge.net/
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bush admitted to violating FISA and said he was proud of it.
So why isn't he in prison yet?...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Nathanael Nerode:
>
>> In reality, as "user A", I switched to using cdrdao for making serious audio
>> CDs and CD-RWs, and for burning disks from .iso files: this uses
>> Schilling'
GPL-without-source and no-license-text drivers are serious and
separate issues, and affect far more drivers than properly-licensed
sourceless firmware affects.)
I suggest a d-d-a post adding this link:
http://doolittle.icarus.com/~larry/fwinventory/2.6.17.html
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTE
Oddly enough nobody has proposed a GR addressing this, and Debian continues
to ship 47 improperly licensed files in linux-2.6. If I were SCO, I'd buy
up the copyrights to them from the original companies, and then I'd have a
real case for a lawsuit.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PRO
Joe Smith wrote:
> "Sven Luther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 09:27:21AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>>> On Aug 30, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
derivative of both the firmware
and the other parts of the kernel. Simply putting files side by side is
mere aggregation -- what's happening with the drivers and firmware might be
mere aggregation, but nobody can be sure until a court case happens.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 08:48:00PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>
>> Debian needs to make a decision on how it will deal with this legal
>> minefield. That is higher priority than the entire discussion going on
>> right now, because it determ
ng than new bugs.
A release where we fixed all the (discovered and undiscovered) RC bugs from
the *previous* release would be a very successful release. :-)
> and finding the relative time-to-fix of each of these.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bush admitted to violating FISA and said he was proud of it.
So why isn't he in prison yet?...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Toni Mueller wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 30.08.2006 at 09:27:21 +0200, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Aug 30, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Debian must decide whether it wants to ship BLOBs with l
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 08:26:56PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> Actually, letting an overworked team of four with (to my knowledge) zero
>> legal expertise settle questions of legal liability is pretty absurd too.
>
> They are the team respon
is to run udev in the chroot, but I think
for now probably the dependency should be specified.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bush admitted to violating FISA and said he was proud of it.
So why isn't he in prison yet?...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
onf.
Upgrades which require programs to be restarted should do it automatically.
But if for some obscure reason they can't, then a high-priority note is
reasonable.
Upgrades from really-messed-up versions may also require people to do
something manually to clean up from the messed-up ver
sendemail
*
* wallpaper-tray
(There are quite a few more -perl and -ruby packages, but I'm not quite sure
which ones have been picked up.)
I will note that rxvt has 1234 popcon installs, so if anyone's going for
brownie points
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bush
n-gnome, and oaf are pretty close to removable,
but not quite. libglade, gnome-libs, and imlib are definitely hanging
around.
Adopters welcome for any of the six. :-)
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bush admitted to violating FISA and said he was proud of it.
So why isn't h
gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:58:31 -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>
>> (There are quite a few more -perl and -ruby packages, but I'm not quite
>> sure which ones have been picked up.)
>
> The lib*-perl packages are all already in the Debian Perl
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 18 September 2006 16:36, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> Frankly, the kernel's "You NEED to restart your computer SOON" message
>> is a good example, if it's telling the truth. But that cheats by not
>> using debconf.
>
&
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
>
>> On Aug 31, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Marco trolled again. FYI, no serious person disagrees with this
>>> interpretation.
>> Except every
I'm guessing translations. They eat up space really fast.
Is there a way to compare packages after localepurge runs?
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This space intentionally left blank.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe&qu
To start with, congratulations to the ftpmasters for keeping up
with the NEW queue. Unfortunately, this email is going to be a
case of damning with faint praise
I'm seeing bugs which were filed as removal requests as early as
August 14 which are still waiting for processing. Unfortunately,
t
nd opens it with O_RDWR | O_CREAT |
O_EXCL."
I'm guessing that the dire warning on tempnam(3) is overblown.
Am I right?
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Make sure your vote will count.
http://www.verifiedvoting.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So I'm going through the old bugs list. There are 37 bugs against emacs20.
emacs20 is only in oldstable-security at this point. What is the correct fate
for
these bugs?
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[Insert famous quote here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
Namely, fix bug #224469. It's really trivial and it's been waiting
for over three years now. This is just STUPID.
Next DPL election, I want to see someone running on the platform of
adding an extra ftpmaster *whether or not the current ftpmasters
like it*. Someone who will get simple stuff like
priorities bugs. I'm extremely impressed.
Credit where credit is due; nearly all the "easy" longstanding bugs were fixed
in a very short amount of time, and the rest had explanations of the problems
added to the bug trail, which is *superb*.
Thanks Ryan Murray et al!
--
N
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
So yes, I believe we need to work on the long-term "ignored" bugs. :)
Those are essentially all I work on.
It's a good thing I have a thick skin. Some maintainers are genuinely grateful
for the
assistance, and they're a pleasure to work with. (This includes the X
e, I strongly suspect inetutils-syslogd will be the winner, even
over
sysklogd. I expect that most of what it needs from netbase will turn out to
already be available in the installer.
Given the state of sysklogd, I hope that it can be removed entirely from a
future
release of Debian.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By whom? A bunch of people with too much time on their hands. Is there
an actual lawyer involved? I don't think so.
This is a crazy stupid argument. By this argument, Debian should distribute
absolutely
anything, no matter what the license, unless a lawyer gets involv
lined posters? Those are the ones who say
"Debian-legal should be ignored, listen to me instead". The regulars are
generally very disciplined and mature, and treat licensing analysis like --
well,
the best analogy is debugging.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bush admi
Eduard Bloch wrote:
>#include
>* Kevin Bube [Fri, Jul 07 2006, 11:29:21AM]:
>> Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > * Adam Borowski [Fri, Jul 07 2006, 10:38:32AM]:
>>
>> >> * dvdrtools, a fork of the last GPLed version, is in non-free
>> >
>> > Please look at dvdrtools' files, eg. cdreco
The NEW queue is down to *22* packages, which is totally unheard of.
Only three packages have been waiting longer than a month -- so
Javier's package is no longer in the 'endless wait' state.
At the same time, the RM bugs are in fairly good shape, and clearly
removals are also being processed pret
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> That's exactly what I did:
>
> apt-get install -y \
> autoconf2.13 \
> toolchain-source toolchain-source-gdb \
> toolchain-source-newlib \
> dpkg-cross dejagnu expect gperf dpatch gobjc cdbs quilt \
> expectk patchutils equi
Manoj said:
>Oh, as a sponsor of the GR, I suppose I should clarify that I
> am not going to accept this amendment; I consider it a bad one. This
> makes our vote method fail the monoticity criteria
> (http://www.electionmethods.org/evaluation.htm). See Scenario 2 below.
>
>
>I'll
need SMP on 80386? Is there even such thing as 80386 SMP
> machines? Not requiring SMP support would make the ABI change
> trivial...
I think there is no such thing as SMP for 80386.
--
Nathanael Nerode
http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html
ting installers, but for
>your own packages it should be straightforward for you to do testing
>and bugfixing even on architectures you don't personally own a machine
>for.
You forget, perhaps, that Jamin is stuck in the NM queue waiting for DAM
approval. Since he's not an official DD yet, he does not have access to
those machines...
--
Nathanael Nerode
http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html
king a
while; s390, m68k, and arm seem to need some serious work.
Good luck finding more people to work on those last three.
The bugs in installer-related packages are listed at:
http://bugs.qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/debian-installer.cgi
(Installer people, feel free to correct my impressions if they're
wrong.)
--
Nathanael Nerode
http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html
rsions of the C++ interface to libdb. Why are they depending
on it? This seems odd to me.
--
Nathanael Nerode
http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html
n be done about this kind of thing, but it's
frustrating.
--
Nathanael Nerode
http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html
lly, if something was released
upstream over a year ago, and Debian releases with an even *older*
version (without good reason), that's not good at all.
--
Nathanael Nerode
http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html
Matt Zimmerman said:
>I disagree. If I'm not mistaken, this is the definition of an RC bug.
>If
>the package has an RC bug, it is not releasable. If there is an RC bug
>which does not imply that the package is unreleasable, it has been
>assigned
>the wrong severity.
So you're saying bug #1965
ing them). Still, most of the
messages are really pretty good, if you know how to filter for the key
words.
--
Nathanael Nerode
http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html
1 - 100 of 193 matches
Mail list logo
